World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Andreas R.T. Schuck

Andreas R.T. Schuck

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Political Science 28 1376 1253 43 41 73 3896

Andreas R.T. Schuck publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Andreas R.T. Schuck between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Andreas R.T. Schuck published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 4 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2011. 4 of the 104 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2011. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 2 publications
2000 2025

104 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Andreas R.T. Schuck: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 1
2002 0
2003 6
2004 0
2005 2
2006 2
2007 6
2008 3
2009 6
2010 7
2011 13
2012 6
2013 10
2014 7
2015 8
2016 5
2017 3
2018 0
2019 2
2020 5
2021 7
2022 0
2023 0
2024 2
2025 2
Total 104
Download as CSV

Andreas R.T. Schuck publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andreas R.T. Schuck sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
20 40 60 80
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 333+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 97. Most scientists, 97, have 333+ publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 71–75 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36–40 publications 333+

This scientist: 73 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 10
41–45 11
46–50 25
51–55 27
56–60 44
61–65 52
66–70 62
71–75 62 73
76–80 79
81–85 71
86–90 82
91–95 65
96–100 85
101–105 76
106–110 66
111–115 78
116–120 67
121–125 73
126–130 73
131–135 64
136–140 45
141–145 53
146–150 44
151–155 45
156–160 33
161–165 32
166–170 28
171–175 31
176–180 29
181–185 27
186–190 36
191–195 27
196–200 24
201–205 16
206–210 16
211–215 19
216–220 16
221–225 17
226–230 18
231–235 23
236–240 17
241–245 13
246–250 17
251–255 9
256–260 13
261–265 8
266–270 12
271–275 8
276–280 10
281–285 13
286–290 13
291–295 5
296–300 6
301–305 11
306–310 9
311–315 6
316–320 4
321–325 4
326–330 2
331–332 5
333+ 97
Download as CSV

Andreas R.T. Schuck D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andreas R.T. Schuck sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 43 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 62+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 100. Most scientists, 100, have 62+ D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 28 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 28 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 76
21 79
22 84
23 68
24 88
25 82
26 76
27 75
28 99 28
29 96
30 96
31 81
32 86
33 81
34 84
35 72
36 58
37 53
38 48
39 40
40 40
41 32
42 26
43 25
44 33
45 33
46 17
47 21
48 22
49 18
50 19
51 19
52 15
53 14
54 10
55 13
56 9
57 11
58 12
59 10
60 5
61 7
62+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Andreas R.T. Schuck is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily falls within the social sciences, with a focus on communication and media studies, political and social sociology, and elements of artificial intelligence applied to these fields. Their work covers multiple subfields, including communication, sociology and political science, management and policy, artificial intelligence, and political science and international relations.

The main topics of their research encompass social media and politics, media studies and communication, media influence and politics, climate change communication and perception, environmental education and sustainability, hate speech and cyberbullying detection, and electoral systems and political participation.

Schuck's recent scholarly contributions include several papers published between 2020 and 2024. These works span a range of topics in media and political communication, climate change, and journalistic practices. Notable recent publications include:

  • "Climate change policy support, intended behaviour change, and their drivers largely unaffected by consensus messages in Germany" (2021) published in Journal of Environmental Psychology
  • "Beyond 'Lügenpresse': How Politicians Criticize and Delegitimize the Media in Germany" (2024) in The International Journal of Press/Politics
  • "Journalists' Misjudgement of Audience Opinion" (2021) in The International Journal of Press/Politics
  • "The gateway belief model - replication and extension in Germany" (2020) available on Arabixiv (OSF Preprints)
  • "Unpacking the Nuances of Agenda-Setting in the Online Media Environment: An Hourly-Event Approach in the Context of Chinese Economic News" (2024) published in Journalism Studies

Throughout their career, Schuck has frequently collaborated with various researchers. These include Robin Tschötschel, Alexandra Schwinges, Anke Wonneberger, David Nicolas Hopmann, and Lina Buttgereit, reflecting ongoing partnerships that have yielded multiple joint publications.

Their research findings have been published in prominent journals and venues, with an emphasis on journals specializing in media, politics, and psychology. Frequent venues for their work include:

  • The International Journal of Press/Politics
  • Journal of Environmental Psychology
  • Arabixiv (OSF Preprints)
  • Journalism Studies
  • Journalism

Overall, Andreas R.T. Schuck's academic profile illustrates a focus on how media and communication intersect with politics, public opinion, and environmental issues. Their contributions span empirical analyses of media effects, investigations into journalistic perceptions, and explorations of political communication strategies.

Best Publications

  • Mapping EU attitudes: Conceptual and empirical dimensions of Euroscepticism and EU support

    Hajo G. Boomgaarden;Andreas R. T. Schuck;Matthijs Elenbaas;Claes H. de Vreese

  • Between Risk and Opportunity News Framing and its Effects on Public Support for EU Enlargement

    Andreas R.T. Schuck;Claes H. de Vreese

  • News coverage and support for European integration, 1990-2006

    Rens Vliegenthart;Andreas R. T. Schuck;Hajo G. Boomgaarden;Claes H. De Vreese

  • Party contestation and Europe on the news agenda: the 2009 European Parliamentary elections

    Andreas R.T. Schuck;Georgios Xezonakis;Matthijs Elenbaas;Susan A. Banducci

  • News on the move: exogenous events and news coverage of the European Union

    Hajo G. Boomgaarden;Rens Vliegenthart;Claes H. de Vreese;Andreas R.T. Schuck

  • Dealing with feelings: Positive and negative discrete emotions as mediators of news framing effects

    S. Lecheler;A.R.T. Schuck;C.H. de Vreese

  • Who's Afraid of Conflict? The Mobilizing Effect of Conflict Framing in Campaign News

    Andreas R.T. Schuck;Rens Vliegenthart;Claes H. De Vreese

  • Cynics All Around? The Impact of Election News on Political Cynicism in Comparative Perspective

    Andreas R.T. Schuck;Hajo G. Boomgaarden;Claes H. de Vreese

  • Reversed Mobilization in Referendum Campaigns: How Positive News Framing Can Mobilize the Skeptics

    Andreas R.T. Schuck;Claes H. de Vreese

  • Explaining Campaign News Coverage: How Medium, Time, and Context Explain Variation in the Media Framing of the 2009 European Parliamentary Elections

    Andreas R. T. Schuck;Rens Vliegenthart;Hajo G. Boomgaarden;Matthijs Elenbaas

  • Linking Survey and Media Content Data: Opportunities, Considerations, and Pitfalls

    Claes H. De Vreese;Mark Boukes;Andreas Schuck;Rens Vliegenthart

  • The Effects of Repetitive News Framing on Political Opinions over Time

    Sophie Lecheler;Mario Keer;Andreas R.T. Schuck;Regula Hänggli

  • Public support for referendums in Europe: a cross-national comparison in 21 countries

    Andreas R.T. Schuck;Claes H. de Vreese

  • The Dutch No to the EU Constitution: Assessing the Role of EU Skepticism and the Campaign

    A.R.T. Schuck;C.H. de Vreese

  • Matching Theory and Data: Why Combining Media Content with Survey Data Matters

    Andreas R.T. Schuck;Rens Vliegenthart;Claes H. De Vreese

  • Across time and space: Explaining variation in news coverage of the European Union

    Hajo G. Boomgaarden;Claes H. De Vreese;Andreas R.T. Schuck;Rachid Azrout

  • Public Support for Referendums: The Role of the Media

    A.R.T. Schuck;C.H. de Vreese

  • Media Malaise and Political Cynicism

    Andreas R. T. Schuck

  • When good news is bad news: explicating the moderated mediation dynamic behind the reversed mobilization effect

    Andreas R. T. Schuck;Claes H. de Vreese

  • How Anxiety and Enthusiasm Help Explain the Bandwagon Effect

    Sjoerd B. Stolwijk;Andreas R. T. Schuck;Claes H. de Vreese

  • Cynics all around? The impact of election news on political cynicism in comparative perspective

    A. Schuck;H. Boomgaarden;C. de Vreese

  • Explaining campaign news coverage: how medium, time and context explain variation in the media framing of the 2009 European Parliamentary elections

    A. Schuck;R. Vliegenthart;H. Boomgaarden;M. Elenbaas

Frequent Co-Authors

Claes H. de Vreese
Claes H. de Vreese University of Amsterdam
Hajo G. Boomgaarden
Hajo G. Boomgaarden University of Vienna
Rens Vliegenthart
Rens Vliegenthart Wageningen University & Research
Sophie Lecheler
Sophie Lecheler University of Vienna
Silke Adam
Silke Adam University of Bern
Peter Neijens
Peter Neijens University of Amsterdam
Susan Banducci
Susan Banducci University of Exeter
Joost van Spanje
Joost van Spanje Royal Holloway University of London
Lynda Lee Kaid
Lynda Lee Kaid University of Florida
Jochen Peter
Jochen Peter University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Political Science in the USA can open doors to a wide range of academic and career opportunities. Many students opt for interdisciplinary studies degree programs online to gain skills across multiple fields such as law, sociology, and international relations. Such flexibility can be especially valuable for those interested in public service, policy analysis, or nonprofit careers.

If you’re passionate about history and culture alongside politics, consider pursuing the best online art history master's degree. This advanced degree can help you qualify for roles in research, education, museums, and cultural institutions.

For students looking for quicker entry into the workforce, there are certifications that pay well and can be completed in less time than traditional degrees. These certifications in fields like public administration or project management can make you more employable and boost your earnings potential.

Finally, if you’re eager to advance your education efficiently, explore the quickest cheapest masters degree options online. These programs allow you to earn an accredited graduate degree in less time, helping you reach your career goals faster.

Best Scientists Citing Andreas R.T. Schuck

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles