World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
82
Citations
58850
World Ranking
1291
National Ranking
779

Leda Cosmides publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leda Cosmides sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 141 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Leda Cosmides D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leda Cosmides sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - Jean Nicod Prize, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
  • 2005 - National Institutes of Health Director's Pioneer Award
  • 1999 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation

Overview

Leda Cosmides is affiliated with the University of California, Santa Barbara in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas in the social sciences and psychology, with a focus on evolutionary game theory, cooperation, and the psychology of moral and emotional judgment.

The primary fields of study for this scientist include:

  • Social Sciences
  • Psychology

Their subfields of study are:

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Safety Research
  • Social Psychology

Key topics addressed in their work are:

  • Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social and Cultural Dynamics

Recent publications include:

  • "A moral trade-off system produces intuitive judgments that are rational and coherent and strike a balance between conflicting moral values," 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "The evolution of war and its cognitive foundations," 2025, Evolution and Human Behavior
  • "Cognitive foundations for helping and harming others: Making welfare tradeoffs in industrialized and small-scale societies," 2023, Evolution and Human Behavior
  • "Rational inferences about social valuation," 2023, Cognition
  • "Partisans use emotions as social pressure: Feeling anger and gratitude at exiters and recruits in political groups," 2021, Party Politics

Frequently publishing venues include:

  • Evolution and Human Behavior
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Cognition
  • Party Politics
  • PLoS ONE

Their most frequent coauthors are:

  • John Tooby
  • Daniel Sznycer
  • Sakura Arai
  • Ricardo Andrés Guzmán
  • María Teresa Barbato

Leda Cosmides has been recognized with several awards, including:

  • Jean Nicod Prize, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), 2020
  • National Institutes of Health Director's Pioneer Award, 2005
  • Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation, 1999

Best Publications

  • The psychological foundations of culture.

    John Tooby;Leda Cosmides

  • The Adapted mind : evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture

    Jerome H. Barkow;Leda Cosmides;John Tooby

  • The logic of social exchange: has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task.

    Leda Cosmides

  • The past explains the present: Emotional adaptations and the structure of ancestral environments

    John Tooby;Leda Cosmides

  • Cognitive adaptations for social exchange.

    Leda Cosmides;John Tooby

  • Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty.

    Leda Cosmides;John Tooby

  • On the universality of human nature and the uniqueness of the individual: the role of genetics and adaptation.

    John Tooby;Leda Cosmides

  • The Adapted Mind

    Leda Cosmides;Jerome H. Barkow

  • Can race be erased? Coalitional computation and social categorization

    Robert Kurzban;John Tooby;Leda Cosmides

  • From evolution to behavior: Evolutionary psychology as the missing link.

    Leda Cosmides;John Tooby

  • Conceptual Foundations of Evolutionary Psychology

    John Tooby;Leda Cosmides

  • Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture, part II: Case study: A computational theory of social exchange

    Leda Cosmides;John Tooby

  • Formidability and the logic of human anger

    Aaron Nathaniel Sell;John Tooby;Leda Cosmides

  • Friendship and the Banker's Paradox: Other Pathways to the Evolution of Adaptations for Altruism

    John Tooby;Leda Cosmides

  • The architecture of human kin detection

    Debra Lieberman;Debra Lieberman;John Tooby;Leda Cosmides

  • Mapping the mind: Origins of domain specificity: The evolution of functional organization

    Leda Cosmides;John Tooby

  • Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture, part I: Theoretical considerations

    John Tooby;Leda Cosmides

  • Better than rational: Evolutionary psychology and the invisible hand

    Leda Cosmides;John Tooby

  • Evolutionary psychology: A Primer

    Leda Cosmides;John Tooby

  • Cytoplasmic inheritance and intragenomic conflict

    Leda Murlas Cosmides;John Tooby

Frequent Co-Authors

John Tooby
John Tooby University of California, Santa Barbara
Michael Bang Petersen
Michael Bang Petersen Aarhus University
Stanley B. Klein
Stanley B. Klein University of California, Santa Barbara
Debra Lieberman
Debra Lieberman University of Miami
Shaul Shalvi
Shaul Shalvi University of Amsterdam
Michael Gurven
Michael Gurven University of California, Santa Barbara
Christopher von Rueden
Christopher von Rueden University of Richmond
Eric Alden Smith
Eric Alden Smith University of Washington
Robert Kurzban
Robert Kurzban University of Pennsylvania
Quentin D. Atkinson
Quentin D. Atkinson University of Auckland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering studying psychology in the USA, there are a range of online degree programs and career pathways to explore. Many students begin with a bachelor’s or master’s in psychology, which can lead to fulfilling roles in counseling, social work, or mental health advocacy. Online programs offer flexibility—allowing you to balance studies with work or family commitments.

Earning a professional license is a crucial step for those pursuing therapy or counseling careers. Requirements can vary by state and even by city, so it's important to research your intended location. For example, discover how to become a licensed therapist in Richmond or learn about becoming a licensed therapist in Riverside. Similarly, you may want to find out more about becoming a licensed therapist in Sacramento and specific licensed therapist requirements in Saint Paul.

As you explore these options, be sure to check accreditation, state guidelines, and the range of specialties available. This preparation will help you succeed, whether you plan to pursue clinical practice, research, or community support roles in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Leda Cosmides

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles