World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
63
Citations
26990
World Ranking
3053
National Ranking
1739

Peter M. Todd publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter M. Todd sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 255 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Peter M. Todd D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter M. Todd sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Peter M. Todd is affiliated with Indiana University in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within psychology and neuroscience, with a strong focus on understanding cognitive processes and human behavior through experimental and theoretical approaches.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Within these fields, their subfields of expertise encompass:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Applied Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

The topics frequently addressed in their work are:

  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Environmental Education and Sustainability
  • Agricultural Innovations and Practices
  • Organic Food and Agriculture

Peter M. Todd has coauthored papers with several frequent collaborators, including:

  • Athena Aktipis
  • Diego Guevara Beltrán
  • Jessica D. Ayers
  • Andrew Van Horn
  • Lee Cronk

Their recent publication record includes works across a variety of peer-reviewed journals and venues. Key recent papers are:

  • Foraging in Mind, 2020, Current Directions in Psychological Science
  • Agricultural decision making and climate uncertainty in developing countries, 2020, Environmental Research Letters
  • Neural evidence of switch processes during semantic and phonetic foraging in human memory, 2023, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Semantic Search in Psychosis: Modeling Local Exploitation and Global Exploration, 2020, Schizophrenia Bulletin Open
  • In which environments is impulsive behavior adaptive? A cross-discipline review and integration of formal models., 2022, Psychological Bulletin

The frequent publication venues where Peter M. Todd's work appears include:

  • Personality and Individual Differences
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Environmental Research Letters
  • Current Directions in Psychological Science
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

In recognition of their contributions, Peter M. Todd was named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2018.

Best Publications

  • Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart

    Gerd Gigerenzer;Peter M. Todd

  • Can There Ever Be Too Many Options? A Meta-Analytic Review of Choice Overload

    Benjamin Scheibehenne;Rainer Greifeneder;Peter M. Todd

  • Designing neural networks using genetic algorithms

    Geoffrey F. Miller;Peter M. Todd;Shailesh U. Hegde

  • Précis of "Simple heuristics that make us smart"

    Peter M. Todd;Gerd Gigerenzer

  • Ecological Rationality: Intelligence in the World

    Peter M. Todd;Gerd Gigerenzer

  • Exploration versus exploitation in space, mind, and society

    Thomas Trenholm Hills;Peter M. Todd;David Lazer;David Lazer;A. David Redish

  • Bounding rationality to the world

    Peter M. Todd;Gerd Gigerenzer

  • Environments That Make Us Smart Ecological Rationality

    Peter M. Todd;Gerd Gigerenzer

  • Different cognitive processes underlie human mate choices and mate preferences.

    Peter M. Todd;Lars Penke;Barbara Fasolo;Alison P. Lenton

  • Mate choice turns cognitive

    Geoffrey F Miller;Peter M Todd

  • Optimal foraging in semantic memory

    Thomas Trenholm Hills;Michael N. Jones;Peter M. Todd

  • Unpacking the exploration–exploitation tradeoff: A synthesis of human and animal literatures.

    Sabine Mehlhorn;Ben R Newell;Peter M Todd;Michael D Lee

  • Fast and frugal food choices : uncovering individual decision heuristics

    Benjamin Scheibehenne;Linda Miesler;Peter M. Todd

  • Fast and frugal heuristics for environmentally bounded minds

    Peter M. Todd

  • Learning and connectionist representations

    David E. Rumelhart;Peter M. Todd

  • Accurate judgments of intention from motion cues alone: A cross-cultural study

    H. Clark Barrett;Peter M. Todd;Geoffrey F. Miller;Philip W. Blythe

  • From pride and prejudice to persuasion : Satisficing in mate search

    Peter M. Todd;Geoffrey F. Miller

  • What Moderates the Too-Much-Choice Effect?

    Benjamin Scheibehenne;Rainer Greifeneder;Peter M. Todd

  • Music and Connectionism

    Peter M. Todd;D. Gareth Loy;Louis P. DiPalma;David J. Hamilton

  • How motion reveals intention: Categorizing social interactions

    Philip W. Blythe;Peter M. Todd;Geoffrey F. Miller

Frequent Co-Authors

Gerd Gigerenzer
Gerd Gigerenzer Max Planck Institute for Human Development
Geoffrey F. Miller
Geoffrey F. Miller University of New Mexico
Trevor W. Robbins
Trevor W. Robbins University of Cambridge
Lars Penke
Lars Penke University of Göttingen
Jutta Mata
Jutta Mata University of Mannheim
Robert L. Goldstone
Robert L. Goldstone Indiana University
Jens B. Asendorpf
Jens B. Asendorpf Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Michael E. Jones
Michael E. Jones Macquarie University
Ralph Hertwig
Ralph Hertwig Max Planck Institute for Human Development
Stephen J. Payne
Stephen J. Payne University of Bath

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to a wide array of professional opportunities. One rapidly growing field is speech-language pathology, which requires specialized training and state-specific certification. Psychology graduates often pursue master’s degrees in this area, combining their understanding of cognitive and behavioral sciences with clinical skills.

If you’re considering related online degrees, it’s important to review certification standards for each state. For example, becoming a speech therapist in Mississippi and meeting the unique educational and licensing requirements will differ from other regions. Those aiming to practice in the Midwest should research Missouri speech pathologist certification requirements or Montana slp certification requirements for accurate guidance.

Additionally, requirements may vary even further in the Plains states, as outlined in the Nebraska speech pathologist certification requirements. Understanding these pathways ensures that you select the right online program and meet the criteria for your preferred career destination.

Best Scientists Citing Peter M. Todd

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles