World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
45
Citations
7954
World Ranking
6391
National Ranking
2301

Lawrence D. Carey publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence D. Carey sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 206 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Lawrence D. Carey D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence D. Carey sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lawrence D. Carey is affiliated with the University of Alabama in Huntsville in the United States. Their research spans multiple interdisciplinary fields including Physics and Astronomy, Environmental Science, and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with notable focus also on several subfields such as Astronomy and Astrophysics, Global and Planetary Change, and Atmospheric Science.

The scientific work of Lawrence D. Carey primarily centers on topics related to lightning and electromagnetic phenomena, fire effects on ecosystems, meteorological phenomena and simulations, atmospheric aerosols and clouds, plant water relations and carbon dynamics, seismic waves and analysis, and climate variability and models.

Key recent papers authored or co-authored by Carey include:

  • A Storm Safari in Subtropical South America: Proyecto RELAMPAGO, 2021, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • The RELAMPAGO Lightning Mapping Array: Overview and Initial Comparison with the Geostationary Lightning Mapper, 2020, Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
  • Characterizing Charge Structure in Central Argentina Thunderstorms During RELAMPAGO Utilizing a New Charge Layer Polarity Identification Method, 2021, Earth and Space Science
  • Huntsville Alabama Marx Meter Array 2: Upgrade and Capability, 2020, Earth and Space Science
  • Observations of Anomalous Charge Structures in Supercell Thunderstorms in the Southeastern United States, 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Lawrence D. Carey include:

  • Timothy J. Lang
  • Phillip M. Bitzer
  • Bruno L. Medina
  • Wiebke Deierling
  • Richard J. Blakeslee

Publications commonly appear in journals such as the Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Earth and Space Science, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), and Geophysical Research Letters.

Best Publications

  • The GOES-R GeoStationary Lightning Mapper (GLM)

    Steven J. Goodman;Richard J. Blakeslee;William J. Koshak;Douglas Mach

  • The Relationship between Precipitation and Lightning in Tropical Island Convection: A C-Band Polarimetric Radar Study

    Lawrence D. Carey;Steven A. Rutledge

  • Lightning and Severe Weather: A Comparison between Total and Cloud-to-Ground Lightning Trends

    Christopher J. Schultz;Walter A. Petersen;Lawrence D. Carey

  • Electrical and multiparameter radar observations of a severe hailstorm

    Lawrence D. Carey;Steven A. Rutledge

  • A multiparameter radar case study of the microphysical and kinematic evolution of a lightning producing storm

    L. D. Carey;S. A. Rutledge

  • Preliminary Development and Evaluation of Lightning Jump Algorithms for the Real-Time Detection of Severe Weather

    Christopher J. Schultz;Walter A. Petersen;Lawrence D. Carey

  • TELEX The Thunderstorm Electrification and Lightning Experiment

    Donald R. MacGorman;W. David Rust;Terry J. Schuur;Michael I. Biggerstaff

  • Lightning location relative to storm structure in a leading‐line, trailing‐stratiform mesoscale convective system

    Lawrence D. Carey;Martin J. Murphy;Tracy L. McCormick;Nicholas W. S. Demetriades

  • Radar observations of the kinematic, microphysical, and precipitation characteristics of two MCSs in TRMM LBA

    Robert Cifelli;Walter A. Petersen;Lawrence D. Carey;Steven A. Rutledge

  • Mesoscale and Radar Observations of the Fort Collins Flash Flood of 28 July 1997

    Walter A. Petersen;Lawrence D. Carey;Steven A. Rutledge;Jason C. Knievel

  • The Deep Convective Clouds and Chemistry (DC3) Field Campaign

    Mary C. Barth;Christopher A. Cantrell;William H. Brune;Steven A. Rutledge

  • The Midlatitude Continental Convective Clouds Experiment (MC3E)

    M. P. Jensen;W. A. Petersen;Aaron R. Bansemer;N. Bharadwaj

  • Correcting Propagation Effects in C-Band Polarimetric Radar Observations of Tropical Convection Using Differential Propagation Phase

    Lawrence D. Carey;Steven A. Rutledge;David A. Ahijevych;Tom D. Keenan

  • Environmental Control of Cloud-to-Ground Lightning Polarity in Severe Storms

    Lawrence D. Carey;Kurt M. Buffalo

  • CSU-CHILL polarimetric radar measurements from a severe hail storm in eastern Colorado

    J. Hubbert;V. N. Bringi;L. D. Carey;S. Bolen

  • THE SHARED MOBILE ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH AND TEACHING RADAR A Collaboration to Enhance Research and Teaching

    Michael I. Biggerstaff;Louis J. Wicker;Jerry Guynes;Conrad Ziegler

  • The Community Collaborative Rain, Hail, and Snow Network Informal Education for Scientists and Citizens

    Robert Cifelli;Nolan Doesken;Patrick Kennedy;Lawrence D. Carey

  • The Relationship between Severe Storm Reports and Cloud-to-Ground Lightning Polarity in the Contiguous United States from 1989 to 1998

    Lawrence D. Carey;Steven A. Rutledge;Walter A. Petersen

  • Meteorological Overview of the Devastating 27 April 2011 Tornado Outbreak

    Kevin R. Knupp;Todd A. Murphy;Timothy A. Coleman;Ryan A. Wade

  • Describing the Shape of Raindrop Size Distributions Using Uncorrelated Raindrop Mass Spectrum Parameters

    Christopher R. Williams;V. N. Bringi;Lawrence D. Carey;V. Chandrasekar

  • Environmental control of cloud-to-ground lightning polarity in severe storms during IHOP

    Lawrence D. Carey

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven A. Rutledge
Steven A. Rutledge Colorado State University
Richard J. Blakeslee
Richard J. Blakeslee Marshall Space Flight Center
Steven J. Goodman
Steven J. Goodman National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
V. N. Bringi
V. N. Bringi Colorado State University
Ali Tokay
Ali Tokay University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Daniel J. Cecil
Daniel J. Cecil Marshall Space Flight Center
Donald R. MacGorman
Donald R. MacGorman University of Oklahoma
Kenneth E. Pickering
Kenneth E. Pickering University of Maryland, College Park
Robert Cifelli
Robert Cifelli National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Timothy J. Lang
Timothy J. Lang Marshall Space Flight Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens diverse career pathways, often intersecting with fields like public administration, sociology, and education. For those aiming to influence environmental policy and management, pursuing a 1 year mpa online can provide practical leadership skills within a condensed timeframe.

Understanding human behavior and societal impacts on the environment is equally important. An online sociology bachelor degree online equips students with essential knowledge to analyze social factors driving environmental change.

For environmental educators and researchers, advancing through online education degrees is a strategic choice. Programs offering an online eds to edd programs provide flexible pathways to doctoral qualifications, allowing professionals to enhance their expertise without disrupting their careers.

Moreover, those seeking doctoral studies with fewer barriers may find value in an edd without dissertation program, which prioritizes practical research methodologies over traditional dissertation requirements. This approach suits candidates focused on applied environmental education and leadership.

Best Scientists Citing Lawrence D. Carey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles