World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
53
Citations
11433
World Ranking
4218
National Ranking
1589

Paul R. Krehbiel publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul R. Krehbiel sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 244 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Paul R. Krehbiel D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul R. Krehbiel sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - Fellow of American Geophysical Union (AGU)

Overview

Paul R. Krehbiel is affiliated with the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on the fields of physics and astronomy as well as engineering, with significant contributions in both areas. The scientist's work spans several interconnected subfields, including astronomy and astrophysics, electrical and electronic engineering, global and planetary change, materials chemistry, and control and systems engineering.

The primary topics investigated by Paul R. Krehbiel revolve around lightning and electromagnetic phenomena, which dominate their publication record. Additional topics include fire effects on ecosystems, high voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena, ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics, plant responses to water stress, thermal analysis in power transmission, and astrophysics and cosmic phenomena.

Paul R. Krehbiel has published extensively in various scientific venues. Frequent publication platforms include:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
  • Earth and Space Science

Their recent papers include the following:

  • "Flickering gamma-ray flashes, the missing link between gamma glows and TGFs," 2024, Nature
  • "Dart-Leader and K-Leader Velocity From Initiation Site to Termination Time-Resolved With 3D Interferometry," 2021, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • "Application of Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition in Low-Frequency Lightning Electric Field Signal Analysis and Lightning Location," 2020, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
  • "Radio Interferometer Observations of an Energetic in-Cloud Pulse Reveal Large Currents Generated by Relativistic Discharges," 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • "Determining Electric Fields in Thunderclouds With the Radiotelescope LOFAR," 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres

Collaboration is a notable aspect of their work. Frequent co-authors of Paul R. Krehbiel include M. A. Stanley, Caitano L. da Silva, H. E. Edens, Yijun Zhang, and W. Rison.

Paul R. Krehbiel received the designation of Fellow of the American Geophysical Union (AGU) in 2013. This recognition is part of their academic and scientific record.

Best Publications

  • A GPS‐based three‐dimensional lightning mapping system: Initial observations in central New Mexico

    W. Rison;R. J. Thomas;P. R. Krehbiel;T. Hamlin

  • Accuracy of the Lightning Mapping Array

    Ronald J. Thomas;Paul R. Krehbiel;William Rison;Steven J. Hunyady

  • An analysis of the charge structure of lightning discharges to ground

    Paul R. Krehbiel;Marx Brook;Roy A. McCrory

  • The spatial and temporal development of intracloud lightning

    X. M. Shao;P. R. Krehbiel

  • The electrical structure of the Hokuriku winter thunderstorms

    Marx Brook;Minoru Nakano;Paul Krehbiel;Toshio Takeuti

  • Radio interferometric observations of cloud-to-ground lightning phenomena in Florida

    X. M. Shao;P. R. Krehbiel;R. J. Thomas;W. Rison

  • A distinct class of isolated intracloud lightning discharges and their associated radio emissions

    D. A. Smith;X. M. Shao;D. N. Holden;C. T. Rhodes

  • The Severe Thunderstorm Electrification and Precipitation Study

    Timothy J. Lang;L. Jay Miller;Morris Weisman;Steven A. Rutledge

  • Upward electrical discharges from thunderstorms

    Paul R. Krehbiel;Jeremy A. Riousset;Victor P. Pasko;Ronald J. Thomas

  • Observations of VHF Source Powers Radiated by Lightning

    R. J. Thomas;P. R. Krehbiel;W. Rison;T. Hamlin

  • Observations of narrow bipolar events reveal how lightning is initiated in thunderstorms.

    William Rison;Paul R. Krehbiel;Michael G. Stock;Michael G. Stock;Harald E. Edens

  • TELEX The Thunderstorm Electrification and Lightning Experiment

    Donald R. MacGorman;W. David Rust;Terry J. Schuur;Michael I. Biggerstaff

  • Inverted-polarity electrical structures in thunderstorms in the Severe Thunderstorm Electrification and Precipitation Study (STEPS)

    W. David Rust;Donald R. MacGorman;Eric C. Bruning;Stephanie A. Weiss

  • Effects of charge and electrostatic potential on lightning propagation

    L. M. Coleman;T. C. Marshall;M. Stolzenburg;T. Hamlin

  • GPS‐based mapping system reveals lightning inside storms

    Paul R. Krehbiel;Ronald J. Thomas;William Rison;Timothy Hamlin

  • Observations of lightning phenomena using radio interferometry

    C. T. Rhodes;X. M. Shao;P. R. Krehbiel;R. J. Thomas

  • The Electrical Structure of Two Supercell Storms during STEPS

    Donald R. MacGorman;W. David Rust;Paul Krehbiel;William Rison

  • Continuous broadband digital interferometry of lightning using a generalized cross-correlation algorithm

    M. G. Stock;M. Akita;M. Akita;P. R. Krehbiel;W. Rison

  • High speed video of initial sprite development

    Mark Stanley;Paul Krehbiel;Marx Brook;Charles Moore

  • Observed electric fields associated with lightning initiation

    T. C. Marshall;M. Stolzenburg;C. R. Maggio;L. M. Coleman

  • Comparison of ground‐based 3‐dimensional lightning mapping observations with satellite‐based LIS observations in Oklahoma

    Ronald J. Thomas;Paul R. Krehbiel;William Rison;Timothy Hamlin

Frequent Co-Authors

William Rison
William Rison New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
Ronald J. Thomas
Ronald J. Thomas New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
Donald R. MacGorman
Donald R. MacGorman University of Oklahoma
Maribeth Stolzenburg
Maribeth Stolzenburg University of Mississippi
Thomas C. Marshall
Thomas C. Marshall University of Mississippi
Stephen R. McNutt
Stephen R. McNutt University of South Florida
Steven A. Rutledge
Steven A. Rutledge Colorado State University
Steven A. Cummer
Steven A. Cummer Duke University
Timothy J. Lang
Timothy J. Lang Marshall Space Flight Center
Jean-Pierre Pinty
Jean-Pierre Pinty Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens diverse opportunities, especially when complemented by related online programs. For those aiming to further specialize, exploring eds to edd programs can provide advanced education in leadership and policy, crucial for driving environmental change.

Career flexibility is also enhanced by degrees linked to social impact and community work. Students might consider fully funded dsw programs online to deepen their expertise in social work, aligning community initiatives with environmental goals.

For those seeking a broader academic foundation, an accredited affordable online general studies degree offers a versatile pathway while balancing cost and accreditation, making it an appealing choice for many.

Additionally, exploring options like the easiest bachelors degree can help students find manageable programs to start their journey, especially for those transitioning from other fields. Combining various online degrees strategically enhances career prospects in the environmental sector.

Best Scientists Citing Paul R. Krehbiel

Trending Scientists