World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Earle Williams

Earle Williams

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
72
Citations
19925
World Ranking
1485
National Ranking
632

Earle Williams publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Earle Williams sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 304 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Earle Williams D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Earle Williams sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2010 - Fellow of American Geophysical Union (AGU)

Overview

Earle Williams is affiliated with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in the United States. Their research spans multiple topics within physics, environmental science, and specifically the study of atmospheric and electromagnetic phenomena.

The scientist's main fields of study are:

  • Physics and Astronomy
  • Environmental Science

Within these broader areas, they focus on subfields including:

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Plant Science

Research topics covered in their work include:

  • Lightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Earthquake Detection and Analysis

Earle Williams has published extensively, with notable frequent publication venues being:

  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Electric Power Systems Research
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Williams are:

  • Evolution of Global Lightning in the Transition From Cold to Warm Phase Preceding Two Super El Niño Events, 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • A new look at the environmental conditions favorable to secondary ice production, 2020, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Origin of an Uncommon Multiple-Stroke Positive Cloud-to-Ground Lightning Flash With Different Terminations, 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Aerosol Effects on Lightning Characteristics: A Comparison of Polluted and Clean Regimes, 2020, Geophysical Research Letters
  • Natural ELF fields in the atmosphere and in living organisms, 2020, International Journal of Biometeorology

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Anirban Guha
  • Gabriella Sátori
  • Tamás Bozóki
  • Yakun Liu
  • Péter Steinbach

In 2010, Earle Williams was recognized as a Fellow of the American Geophysical Union (AGU).

Best Publications

  • The electrical nature of storms

    Donald R. MacGorman;W. David Rust;Earle R. Williams

  • The tripole structure of thunderstorms

    Earle R. Williams

  • The schumann resonance: a global tropical thermometer.

    Earle R. Williams

  • Contrasting convective regimes over the Amazon: Implications for cloud electrification

    E. Williams;D. Rosenfeld;N. Madden;J. Gerlach

  • An Analysis of the Conditional Instability of the Tropical Atmosphere

    Earle Williams;Nilton Renno

  • Sprites, ELF Transients, and Positive Ground Strokes.

    Dennis J. Boccippio;Earle R. Williams;Stan J. Heckman;Walter A. Lyons

  • The Behavior of Total Lightning Activity in Severe Florida Thunderstorms

    Earle Williams;Bob Boldi;Anne Matlin;Mark Weber

  • A radar and electrical study of tropical hot towers

    E. R. Williams;S. A. Rutledge;S. G. Geotis;N. Renno

  • Mixed-Phase Clouds: Progress and Challenges

    A. Korolev;G. McFarquhar;P. R. Field;P. R. Field;C. Franklin

  • The physical origin of the land–ocean contrast in lightning activity

    Earle Williams;Sharon Stanfill

  • Lightning and climate: A review

    E.R. Williams

  • The relationship between lightning type and convective state of thunderclouds

    E. R. Williams;M. E. Weber;R. E. Orville

  • Large-scale charge separation in thunderclouds

    Earle R. Williams

  • Streaming potential properties of westerly granite with applications

    F. D. Morgan;E. R. Williams;T. R. Madden

  • Thermodynamic Conditions Favorable to Superlative Thunderstorm Updraft, Mixed Phase Microphysics and Lightning Flash Rate

    E. Williams;V. Mushtak;D. Rosenfeld;S. Goodman

  • The Down Under Doppler and Electricity Experiment (DUNDEE): Overview and Preliminary Results

    Steven A. Rutledge;Earle R. Williams;Thomas D. Keenan

  • Criteria for sprites and elves based on Schumann resonance observations

    E. Huang;E. Williams;R. Boldi;S. Heckman

  • ENSO and the natural variability in the flow of tropical rivers

    Kishan N. Amarasekera;Robert F. Lee;Earle R. Williams;Elfatih A.B. Eltahir

  • The Electrification of Severe Storms

    Earle R. Williams

  • Complex refractive indices and single-scattering albedo of global dust aerosols in the shortwave spectrum and relationship to size and iron content

    Claudia Di Biagio;Paola Formenti;Yves Balkanski;Lorenzo Caponi

  • Contrasting convective regimes over the Amazon: Implications for cloud electrification : Large-scale biosphere-atmosphere experiment in Amazonia (LBA)

    E. Williams;D. Rosenfeld;N. Madden;J. Gerlach

Frequent Co-Authors

Meinrat O. Andreae
Meinrat O. Andreae Max Planck Institute for Chemistry
Colin Price
Colin Price Tel Aviv University
Daniel Rosenfeld
Daniel Rosenfeld Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Richard J. Blakeslee
Richard J. Blakeslee Marshall Space Flight Center
Renyi Zhang
Renyi Zhang Texas A&M University
Nilton O. Renno
Nilton O. Renno University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Luiz A. T. Machado
Luiz A. T. Machado Max Planck Society
Paola Formenti
Paola Formenti Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Konrad Kandler
Konrad Kandler Technical University of Darmstadt
Yves Balkanski
Yves Balkanski French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to various interdisciplinary fields. For those considering flexible and affordable education options, the cheapest dsw program highlights how advanced degrees in related social sciences can complement environmental careers focused on community impact and sustainability.

Students seeking a broad foundational degree might explore an online general studies bachelor degree cheap option. This path offers flexibility and access to diverse courses, enabling a customized approach to environmental concerns through multidisciplinary knowledge.

For those weighing degree options, understanding what's the easiest bachelor's degree to get can help align educational goals with personal strengths. While Environmental Sciences may be rigorous, combining it with easier complementary programs can balance academic load.

Directly aligned with environmental studies, a geoscience online degree offers specialized knowledge in earth processes, crucial for careers in environmental consulting, conservation, and resource management. These degrees often provide the technical skills needed to excel in scientific and policy-driven roles.

Best Scientists Citing Earle Williams

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles