World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 48 5410 5185 44 44 161 14822

Marc Metian publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marc Metian between 2004 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marc Metian published across 23 years, from 2004 to 2026, averaging 9.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2025. 33 of the 211 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2025. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 4 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 26 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 32 publications 2026: 1 publication
2004 2026

211 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marc Metian: publications per year, 2004 to 2026
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 1
2006 4
2007 8
2008 11
2009 9
2010 4
2011 3
2012 0
2013 5
2014 7
2015 7
2016 9
2017 11
2018 15
2019 6
2020 26
2021 20
2022 13
2023 8
2024 10
2025 32
2026 1
Total 211
Download as CSV

Marc Metian publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc Metian sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 161 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444 161
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Marc Metian D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc Metian sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272 48
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Marc Metian is a researcher affiliated with the International Atomic Energy Agency in Austria. Their primary field of study is Environmental Science, with a substantial focus on Pollution, Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, and Ecology. Their work addresses various environmental challenges, particularly those related to aquatic and marine ecosystems.

The scientist's major research topics include:

  • Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies
  • Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
  • Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses
  • Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
  • Mercury impact and mitigation studies
  • Biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties

Marc Metian has contributed frequently to several academic journals, with numerous publications in:

  • Marine Pollution Bulletin
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture
  • Marine Environmental Research

They have collaborated extensively with other researchers, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Peter W. Swarzenski (26 publications)
  • François Oberhaënsli (21 publications)
  • Angus Taylor (13 publications)
  • François Oberhänsli (13 publications)
  • Marc Besson (12 publications)

Among recent publications authored or co-authored by Marc Metian are:

  • "Pharmaceutical pollution of the world's rivers," 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Environmental performance of blue foods," 2021, Nature
  • "Global adoption of novel aquaculture feeds could substantially reduce forage fish demand by 2030," 2020, Nature Food
  • "Effects of Virgin Micro- and Nanoplastics on Fish: Trends, Meta-Analysis, and Perspectives," 2020, Environmental Science & Technology
  • "The environmental footprint of global food production," 2022, Nature Sustainability

Marc Metian's research spans the intersection of environmental contamination, marine ecology, and sustainable aquaculture methods. Their work often addresses the environmental impacts of emerging pollutants such as microplastics and the implications of aquaculture practices on ecosystems and resources. The focus on both chemical pollutants and biological impacts reflects an integration of toxicological and ecological perspectives.

Primarily engaged in studies that combine field data with broader environmental assessments, Marc Metian contributes to understanding how anthropogenic activities influence global water systems and marine resources. The emphasis on aquaculture nutrition, plastic pollution, and environmental footprints ties their research to ongoing efforts in sustainable aquatic resource management and pollution mitigation.

Best Publications

  • Global overview on the use of fish meal and fish oil in industrially compounded aquafeeds: Trends and future prospects

    Albert G.J. Tacon;Marc Metian

  • Pharmaceutical pollution of the world’s rivers

    Unknown

  • Does aquaculture add resilience to the global food system

    Max Troell;Max Troell;Rosamond L. Naylor;Marc Metian;Malcolm Beveridge

  • Fish Matters: Importance of Aquatic Foods in Human Nutrition and Global Food Supply

    Albert G. J. Tacon;Marc Metian

  • Feed Matters: Satisfying the Feed Demand of Aquaculture

    Albert G. J. Tacon;Marc Metian

  • Environmental performance of blue foods

    Jessica A. Gephart;Patrik J. G. Henriksson;Patrik J. G. Henriksson;Patrik J. G. Henriksson;Robert W. R. Parker;Alon Shepon;Alon Shepon;Alon Shepon

  • China's aquaculture and the world's wild fisheries

    Ling Cao;Rosamond L. Naylor;Patrik Henriksson;Duncan Leadbitter

  • Meeting the food and nutrition needs of the poor: the role of fish and the opportunities and challenges emerging from the rise of aquaculture.

    M. C. M. Beveridge;S. H. Thilsted;M. J. Phillips;Marc Metian

  • Fishing for Feed or Fishing for Food: Increasing Global Competition for Small Pelagic Forage Fish

    Albert G J Tacon;Marc Metian

  • Fishing for Aquaculture: Non-Food Use of Small Pelagic Forage Fish—A Global Perspective

    Albert G. J. Tacon;Marc Metian

  • Global adoption of novel aquaculture feeds could substantially reduce forage fish demand by 2030

    Richard S. Cottrell;Richard S. Cottrell;Julia L. Blanchard;Benjamin S. Halpern;Marc Metian

  • The environmental footprint of global food production

    Unknown

  • Effects of Virgin Micro- and Nanoplastics on Fish: Trends, Meta-Analysis, and Perspectives.

    Hugo Jacob;Hugo Jacob;Marc Besson;Peter W. Swarzenski;David Lecchini

  • Responsible Aquaculture and Trophic Level Implications to Global Fish Supply

    Albert G. J. Tacon;Marc Metian;Giovanni M. Turchini;Sena S. De Silva

  • Radical ocean futures-scenario development using science fiction prototyping

    Andrew Merrie;Patrick Keys;Marc Metian;Henrik Österblom

  • Feed ingredients and fertilizers for farmed aquatic animals: sources and composition.

    A. G. J. Tacon;M. Metian;M. R. Hasan

  • An ocean of surprises – Trends in human use, unexpected dynamics and governance challenges in areas beyond national jurisdiction

    Andrew Merrie;Daniel C. Dunn;Marc Metian;Andre M. Boustany

  • Mapping diversity of species in global aquaculture

    Marc Metian;Max Troell;Max Troell;Villy Christensen;Jeroen Steenbeek

  • Accumulation of nine metals and one metalloid in the tropical scallop Comptopallium radula from coral reefs in New Caledonia

    Marc Metian;Paco Bustamante;Laetitia Hédouin;Laetitia Hédouin;Michel Warnau

  • Fish for Health: Improved Nutritional Quality of Cultured Fish for Human Consumption

    Albert G. J. Tacon;Daniel Lemos;Marc Metian

  • Three necessary conditions for establishing effective Sustainable Development Goals in the Anthropocene

    Albert V. Norström;Astrid Dannenberg;Astrid Dannenberg;Geoff McCarney;Manjana Milkoreit

  • Assessment of metal, metalloid, and radionuclide bioaccessibility from mussels to human consumers, using centrifugation and simulated digestion methods coupled with radiotracer techniques.

    Marc Metian;Laetitia Charbonnier;François Oberhaënsli;Paco Bustamante

  • Nickel bioaccumulation in bivalves from the New Caledonia lagoon: seawater and food exposure.

    Laëtitia Hédouin;O. Pringault;Marc Metian;Marc Metian;Paco Bustamante

  • Allometric relationships in the bioconcentration of heavy metals by the edible tropical clam Gafrarium tumidum.

    Laetitia Hedouin;Marc Metian;Jean-Louis Teyssie;Scott Fowler

  • Modeling Social-Ecological Scenarios in Marine Systems

    Henrik Österblom;Andrew Merrie;Marc Metian;Wiebren J. Boonstra

  • Interspecific comparison of Cd bioaccumulation in European Pectinidae (Chlamys varia and Pecten maximus)

    Marc Metian;Marc Metian;Michel Warnau;François Oberhänsli;Jean-Louis Teyssié

Frequent Co-Authors

Michel Warnau
Michel Warnau International Atomic Energy Agency
Paco Bustamante
Paco Bustamante University of La Rochelle
Jean-Louis Teyssié
Jean-Louis Teyssié International Atomic Energy Agency
Peter W. Swarzenski
Peter W. Swarzenski International Atomic Energy Agency
Max Troell
Max Troell Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
David Lecchini
David Lecchini PSL University
Scott W. Fowler
Scott W. Fowler International Atomic Energy Agency
Benjamin S. Halpern
Benjamin S. Halpern University of California, Santa Barbara
Henrik Österblom
Henrik Österblom Stockholm University
Julia L. Blanchard
Julia L. Blanchard University of Tasmania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree related to Environmental Sciences can open doors to diverse career paths that address critical global challenges. For those seeking flexible learning options, exploring an affordable online general studies degree may provide a cost-effective foundation while allowing students to tailor their education towards environmental topics.

If ease of completion is a priority, understanding what is the easiest bachelor's degree to get can help prospective students select programs that balance academic rigor and manageability, enabling them to focus fully on their interests within environmental fields.

Specialized degrees such as a geologist degree online equip learners with in-depth knowledge of Earth's physical processes, essential for careers in natural resource management and environmental consulting. Similarly, a gis degree focuses on spatial data analysis, a crucial skill for monitoring environmental changes and supporting sustainable planning efforts.

Together, these related online degrees offer flexible, accessible pathways to build expertise and advance careers in Environmental Sciences. Selecting the right program aligned with personal and professional goals is key to making a meaningful impact in this evolving field.

Best Scientists Citing Marc Metian

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles