World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
50
Citations
10191
World Ranking
4953
National Ranking
1825

Richard J. Blakeslee publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard J. Blakeslee sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 185 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Richard J. Blakeslee D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard J. Blakeslee sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard J. Blakeslee is affiliated with the Marshall Space Flight Center in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Physics and Astronomy as well as Environmental Science. Within these broader fields, their work focuses on subfields including Astronomy and Astrophysics, Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, and Geophysics.

The main topics explored by Richard J. Blakeslee concentrate on Lightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena, Ionosphere and Magnetosphere Dynamics, Atmospheric Aerosols and Clouds, Fire Effects on Ecosystems, Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations, Electrostatic Discharge in Electronics, and High Voltage Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena.

The scientist has been involved in multiple publications across several venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Nature
  • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology

Richard J. Blakeslee has collaborated regularly with several researchers, with frequent coauthors being:

  • Timothy J. Lang
  • Douglas M. Mach
  • Nikolai Østgaard
  • Christopher J. Schultz
  • Phillip M. Bitzer

Among the recent papers authored or coauthored by Richard J. Blakeslee are:

  • Three Years of the Lightning Imaging Sensor Onboard the International Space Station: Expanded Global Coverage and Enhanced Applications (2020), Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Spectral Observations of Optical Emissions Associated With Terrestrial Gamma-Ray Flashes (2020), Geophysical Research Letters
  • New World Meteorological Organization Certified Megaflash Lightning Extremes for Flash Distance (709 km) and Duration (16.73 s) Recorded From Space (2020), Geophysical Research Letters
  • The RELAMPAGO Lightning Mapping Array: Overview and Initial Comparison with the Geostationary Lightning Mapper (2020), Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
  • Concurrent satellite and ground-based lightning observations from the Optical Lightning Imaging Sensor (ISS-LIS), the low-frequency network Meteorage and the SAETTA Lightning Mapping Array (LMA) in the northwestern Mediterranean region (2020), Atmospheric Measurement Techniques

Best Publications

  • Global frequency and distribution of lightning as observed from space by the Optical Transient Detector

    Hugh J. Christian;Richard J. Blakeslee;Dennis J. Boccippio;William L. Boeck

  • Gridded lightning climatology from TRMM-LIS and OTD: Dataset description

    Daniel J. Cecil;Dennis E. Buechler;Richard J. Blakeslee

  • The GOES-R GeoStationary Lightning Mapper (GLM)

    Steven J. Goodman;Richard J. Blakeslee;William J. Koshak;Douglas Mach

  • Contrasting convective regimes over the Amazon: Implications for cloud electrification

    E. Williams;D. Rosenfeld;N. Madden;J. Gerlach

  • Where Are the Lightning Hotspots on Earth

    Rachel Ifanger Albrecht;Steven J Goodman;Dennis E Buechler;Richard J Blakeslee

  • Performance Assessment of the Optical Transient Detector and Lightning Imaging Sensor. Part I: Predicted Diurnal Variability

    Dennis J. Boccippio;William J. Koshak;Richard J. Blakeslee

  • The Lightning Imaging Sensor

    Hugh J. Christian;Richard J. Blakeslee;Steven J. Goodman;Douglas A. Mach

  • The detection of lightning from geostationary orbit

    Hugh J. Christian;Richard J. Blakeslee;Steven J. Goodman

  • The North Alabama Lightning Mapping Array: Recent Severe Storm Observations and Future Prospects

    S.J. Goodman;R. Blakeslee;H. Christian;W. Koshak

  • Performance Assessment of the Optical Transient Detector and Lightning Imaging Sensor

    Douglas M. Mach;Hugh J. Christian;Richard J. Blakeslee;Dennis J. Boccippio

  • North Alabama Lightning Mapping Array (LMA): VHF Source Retrieval Algorithm and Error Analyses

    W. J. Koshak;R. J. Solakiewicz;R. J. Blakeslee;S. J. Goodman

  • The Optical Transient Detector (OTD): Instrument Characteristics and Cross-Sensor Validation

    D. J. Boccippio;W. Koshak;R. Blakeslee;K. Driscoll

  • Lightning induced brightening in the airglow layer

    W. L. Boeck;O. H. Vaughan;R. Blakeslee;B. Vonnegut

  • TRMM Observations of Intraseasonal Variability in Convective Regimes over the Amazon

    Walter A. Petersen;Stephen W. Nesbitt;Richard J. Blakeslee;Robert Cifelli

  • Lightning mapping observation of a terrestrial gamma-ray flash

    Gaopeng Lu;Richard J. Blakeslee;Jingbo Li;David M. Smith

  • Observations of lightning in the stratosphere

    William L. Boeck;Otha H. Vaughan;Richard J. Blakeslee;Bernard Vonnegut

  • Global electric circuit implications of combined aircraft storm electric current measurements and satellite‐based diurnal lightning statistics

    Douglas M. Mach;Richard J. Blakeslee;Monte G. Bateman

  • THE CHUVA PROJECT How Does Convection Vary across Brazil

    Luiz A. T. Machado;Maria A. F. Silva Dias;Carlos Morales;Gilberto Fisch

  • Electrical measurements over thunderstorms

    Richard J. Blakeslee;Hugh J. Christian;Bernard Vonnegut

  • Three years of the Lightning Imaging Sensor onboard the International Space Station: Expanded Global Coverage and Enhanced Applications

    Richard J. Blakeslee;Timothy J. Lang;William J. Koshak;Dennis Buechler

  • Contrasting convective regimes over the Amazon: Implications for cloud electrification : Large-scale biosphere-atmosphere experiment in Amazonia (LBA)

    E. Williams;D. Rosenfeld;N. Madden;J. Gerlach

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven J. Goodman
Steven J. Goodman National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Hugh J. Christian
Hugh J. Christian University of Alabama in Huntsville
Lawrence D. Carey
Lawrence D. Carey University of Alabama in Huntsville
Daniel J. Cecil
Daniel J. Cecil Marshall Space Flight Center
Steven A. Cummer
Steven A. Cummer Duke University
Paul R. Krehbiel
Paul R. Krehbiel New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
William Rison
William Rison New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
Luiz A. T. Machado
Luiz A. T. Machado Max Planck Society
Timothy J. Lang
Timothy J. Lang Marshall Space Flight Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities and offer flexible learning options. Many students opt for programs that complement environmental studies, such as geology or social work, which intersect with environmental advocacy and community engagement.

Online geology degrees, for example, provide specialized knowledge of Earth processes, essential for careers in environmental consulting and natural resource management. These programs often combine fieldwork with online coursework, making them accessible for a wide range of learners. For students looking for a multidisciplinary approach, affordable online general studies degree programs offer flexibility and a broad curriculum that can be tailored toward environmental topics.

Additionally, those aiming for leadership roles in environmental agencies or nonprofits might consider online DSW programs. These programs equip professionals with skills to address social and environmental issues through policy-making and community outreach.

For students seeking a quicker or less intensive path, exploring the easiest degree to get online may provide a viable alternative without compromising educational goals. Choosing the right program depends on personal interests, career goals, and how each degree aligns with the evolving demands of environmental professions.

To learn more, you can explore online dsw programs, online general studies degree affordable, easiest degree to get, and geology degrees online.

Best Scientists Citing Richard J. Blakeslee

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles