World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
43
Citations
5934
World Ranking
7349
National Ranking
733

Joseph Chilcot publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph Chilcot sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 152 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Joseph Chilcot D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph Chilcot sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joseph Chilcot is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a significant emphasis on nephrology, public health, psychiatry and mental health, clinical psychology, and epidemiology.

Their work spans various topics including dialysis and renal disease management, bipolar disorder and treatment, chronic disease management strategies, organ donation and transplantation, palliative care and end-of-life issues, COVID-19 and mental health, and mental health treatment and access.

Joseph Chilcot has published multiple papers in notable venues. Recent publications include:

  • Clinical practice guideline exercise and lifestyle in chronic kidney disease, 2022, BMC Nephrology
  • Health psychology and the coronavirus (COVID-19) global pandemic: A call for research, 2020, British Journal of Health Psychology
  • Loneliness and type 2 diabetes incidence: findings from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing, 2020, Diabetologia
  • Managing the symptom burden associated with maintenance dialysis: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference, 2023, Kidney International
  • The impact of COVID-19 on health behaviour, well-being, and long-term physical health, 2021, British Journal of Health Psychology

Their work is published frequently in journals such as:

  • British Journal of Health Psychology
  • Journal of Nephrology
  • BMC Nephrology
  • Journal of Renal Care
  • Clinical Kidney Journal

Joseph Chilcot has collaborated extensively with several frequent co-authors, including Kate Bramham, Sharlene A. Greenwood, Sam Norton, Thomas J. Wilkinson, and Ellen M. Castle.

Best Publications

  • Depression on dialysis.

    Joseph Chilcot;David Wellsted;Maria Da Silva-Gane;Ken Farrington;Ken Farrington

  • Fatigue in advanced kidney disease

    Micol Artom;Rona Moss-Morris;Fergus Caskey;Joseph Chilcot

  • Nonadherence in dialysis patients: prevalence, measurement, outcome, and psychological determinants.

    Sarah Clark;Ken Farrington;Joseph Chilcot

  • Changes in illness-related cognitions rather than distress mediate improvements in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptoms and disability following a brief cognitive behavioural therapy intervention.

    Joseph Chilcot;Rona Moss-Morris

  • Brief report: Self-compassion, physical health and the mediating role of health-promoting behaviours.

    Sara Dunne;David Sheffield;Joseph Chilcot

  • Further development in the assessment of psychological flexibility: a shortened Committed Action Questionnaire (CAQ-8).

    L M McCracken;J Chilcot;S Norton

  • Depression and Kidney Transplantation

    Joseph Chilcot;Benjamin Walter Jack Spencer;Hannah Maple;Nizam Mamode

  • Illness representations are associated with fluid nonadherence among hemodialysis patients

    Joseph Chilcot;Joseph Chilcot;David Wellsted;Ken Farrington;Ken Farrington

  • Health psychology and the coronavirus (COVID-19) global pandemic: A call for research.

    Madelynne A. Arden;Joseph Chilcot

  • Decentering, rumination, cognitive defusion, and psychological flexibility in people with chronic pain

    Lance M. McCracken;Lance M. McCracken;Estelle Barker;Joseph Chilcot

  • An association between depressive symptoms and survival in incident dialysis patients

    Joseph Chilcot;Andrew Davenport;David Wellsted;John Firth

  • The factor structure of the PHQ-9 in palliative care

    Joseph Chilcot;Lauren Rayner;William Lee;Annabel Price

  • Patient's perceptions of chronic kidney disease and their association with psychosocial and clinical outcomes: a narrative review

    Amy L. Clarke;Thomas Yates;Alice C. Smith;Joseph Chilcot

  • Improving distress in dialysis (iDiD): a feasibility two-arm parallel randomised controlled trial of an online cognitive behavioural therapy intervention with and without therapist-led telephone support for psychological distress in patients undergoing haemodialysis

    Joanna L Hudson;Rona Moss-Morris;David Game;Amy Carroll

  • Tailored online cognitive behavioural therapy with or without therapist support calls to target psychological distress in adults receiving haemodialysis: a feasibility randomised controlled trial

    Joanna L Hudson;Rona Moss-Morris;Sam Norton;Federica Picariello

  • Screening for depression while patients dialyse: an evaluation

    Joseph Chilcot;David Wellsted;Ken Farrington

  • Illness perceptions predict survival in haemodialysis patients

    Joseph Chilcot;David Wellsted;Ken Farrington

  • A confirmatory factor analysis and validation of the forms of self-criticism/reassurance scale

    Nuriye Kupeli;Joseph Chilcot;Ulrike H. Schmidt;Iain C. Campbell

  • The importance of illness perception in end-stage renal disease: associations with psychosocial and clinical outcomes.

    Joseph Chilcot

  • Loneliness and type 2 diabetes incidence: findings from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing.

    Ruth A. Hackett;Joanna L. Hudson;Joseph Chilcot

  • Depression in End-Stage Renal Disease: Current Advances and Research

    Joseph Chilcot;David Wellsted;Ken Farrington;Ken Farrington

Frequent Co-Authors

Sam Norton
Sam Norton King's College London
Rona Moss-Morris
Rona Moss-Morris King's College London
John Weinman
John Weinman King's College London
Lance M. McCracken
Lance M. McCracken Uppsala University
Nicholas A. Troop
Nicholas A. Troop Plymouth University
Naomi A. Fineberg
Naomi A. Fineberg University of Hertfordshire
Iain C. Campbell
Iain C. Campbell King's College London
Matthew Hotopf
Matthew Hotopf King's College London
Ulrike Schmidt
Ulrike Schmidt King's College London
Myra S. Hunter
Myra S. Hunter King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of related online degrees and rewarding career pathways. One popular option is becoming a speech-language pathologist (SLP), a profession that helps individuals overcome speech, language, and communication challenges. Each state has unique requirements for licensure and certification, so it’s crucial to research your desired location carefully.

For instance, those interested in working in Ohio should review the Ohio speech pathologist certification requirements. In Oklahoma, aspiring SLPs need to follow a different process, outlined in the Oklahoma speech pathologist certification requirements.

If you are considering Oregon, read about becoming a speech therapist in Oregon to understand the specific educational and licensing steps. Similarly, those aiming for licensure in Pennsylvania should check out the Pennsylvania slp certification requirements for up-to-date information.

Exploring these options can lead to impactful careers that complement a background in psychology. With the flexibility of online degrees, many students find it easier than ever to pursue specialized paths while maintaining their personal and professional commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Joseph Chilcot

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles