World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 39 8530 7964 13 13 103 7090

Marcela Matos publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marcela Matos between 2009 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marcela Matos published across 17 years, from 2009 to 2025, averaging 7.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2021. 18 of the 135 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2009 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2021. 2009: 4 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 11 publications
2009 2025

135 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marcela Matos: publications per year, 2009 to 2025
Year Publications
2009 4
2010 0
2011 10
2012 8
2013 6
2014 9
2015 10
2016 4
2017 11
2018 4
2019 5
2020 8
2021 17
2022 10
2023 11
2024 7
2025 11
Total 135
Download as CSV

Marcela Matos publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcela Matos sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 103 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 103
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Marcela Matos D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcela Matos sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 39
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Marcela Matos is affiliated with the University of Coimbra in Portugal and has a research focus primarily within the field of Psychology, with 114 publications contributing to this domain. Their work covers several subfields including Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Sociology and Political Science.

The main topics that Marcela Matos explores include mindfulness and compassion interventions, COVID-19 and mental health, psychological well-being and life satisfaction, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, cognitive processes, emotions and moral behavior, and resilience and mental health.

Marcela Matos has published in multiple frequent venues such as Mindfulness, Current Psychology, PsycTESTS Dataset, Journal of Clinical Psychology, and PLoS ONE. Their recent papers reflect a focus on mental health interventions and social factors during the COVID-19 pandemic. Selected publications include:

  • "Compassion Protects Mental Health and Social Safeness During the COVID-19 Pandemic Across 21 Countries," 2022, Mindfulness
  • "The role of social connection on the experience of COVID-19 related post-traumatic growth and stress," 2021, PLoS ONE

Other notable papers related to psychological interventions and mental health include:

  • "Effectiveness of psychological interventions in the treatment of perinatal depression: A systematic review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses," 2021, Journal of Affective Disorders
  • "A new measure to assess external and internal shame: development, factor structure and psychometric properties of the External and Internal Shame Scale," 2020, Current Psychology
  • "The impact of compassion-focused therapy on positive and negative mental health outcomes: Results of a series of meta-analyses," 2023, Clinical Psychology Science and Practice

Marcela Matos frequently collaborates with several researchers, including Paul Gilbert, Stanley R. Steindl, Nicola Petrocchi, Lara Palmeira, and Ana Galhardo. These coauthors have contributed collectively to multiple studies, reflecting collaborations within clinical and social psychology research.

Best Publications

  • Fears of compassion: development of three self-report measures.

    Paul Gilbert;Kirsten McEwan;Marcela Matos;Amanda Rivis

  • The development of compassionate engagement and action scales for self and others

    Paul Gilbert;Francisca Catarino;Cristiana Duarte;Marcela Matos

  • Fears of compassion and happiness in relation to alexithymia, mindfulness, and self‐criticism

    P. Gilbert;Kirsten McEwan;L. Gibbons;S. Chotai

  • Shame as a traumatic memory.

    Marcela Matos;José Pinto-Gouveia

  • Can Shame Memories Become a Key to Identity? The Centrality of Shame Memories Predicts Psychopathology

    José Pinto-Gouveia;Marcela Matos

  • The Effect of Shame and Shame Memories on Paranoid Ideation and Social Anxiety

    Marcela Matos;José Pinto-Gouveia;Paul Gilbert

  • The Protective Role of Self-compassion in Relation to Psychopathology Symptoms and Quality of Life in Chronic and in Cancer Patients

    José Pinto-Gouveia;Cristiana Duarte;Marcela Matos;Sofia Fráguas

  • Psychological and Physiological Effects of Compassionate Mind Training: a Pilot Randomised Controlled Study

    Marcela Matos;Cristiana Duarte;Joana Duarte;José Pinto-Gouveia

  • Effects of intranasal oxytocin on 'compassion focused imagery'.

    Helen Rockliff;Anke Karl;Kirsten McEwan;Jean Gilbert

  • The impact of shame and self-judgment on psychopathology in infertile patients

    Ana Galhardo;José Pinto-Gouveia;Marina Cunha;Marcela Matos

  • The Other As Shamer Scale-2: Development and validation of a short version of a measure of external shame.

    Marcela Matos;José Pinto-Gouveia;Paul Gilbert;Cristiana Duarte

  • Effectiveness of psychological interventions in the treatment of perinatal depression: A systematic review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

    Mariana Branquinho;María de la Fe Rodriguez-Muñoz;Berta Rodrigues Maia;Mariana Marques

  • Shame memories and psychopathology in adolescence: The mediator effect of shame

    Marina Cunha;Marcela Matos;Daniela Faria;Sofia Zagalo

  • Understanding the Importance of Attachment in Shame Traumatic Memory Relation to Depression: The Impact of Emotion Regulation Processes

    Marcela Matos;José Pinto-Gouveia;Vânia Costa

  • Ability to receive compassion from others buffers the depressogenic effect of self-criticism: A cross-cultural multi-study analysis

    Nicola Hermanto;David C. Zuroff;Daniel C. Kopala-Sibley;Allison C. Kelly

  • Shame Memories and Eating Psychopathology: The Buffering Effect of Self‐Compassion

    Cláudia Ferreira;Marcela Matos;Cristiana Duarte;José Pinto-Gouveia

  • The Mediator Role of Emotion Regulation Processes on Infertility-Related Stress

    Ana Galhardo;Marina Cunha;José Pinto-Gouveia;Marcela Matos

  • The Origins of Fears of Compassion: Shame and Lack of Safeness Memories, Fears of Compassion and Psychopathology

    Marcela Matos;Joana Duarte;José Pinto-Gouveia

  • The role of social connection on the experience of COVID-19 related post-traumatic growth and stress

    Unknown

  • Internalizing early memories of shame and lack of safeness and warmth: the mediating role of shame on depression.

    Marcela Matos;José Pinto-Gouveia;Cristiana Duarte

  • Differences between depression and paranoia: the role of emotional memories, shame and subordination.

    José Pinto-Gouveia;Marcela Matos;Paula Castilho;Ana Xavier

  • Above and beyond emotional valence: The unique contribution of central and traumatic shame memories to psychopathology vulnerability

    Marcela Matos;José Pinto-Gouveia;Cristiana Duarte

Frequent Co-Authors

José Pinto-Gouveia
José Pinto-Gouveia University of Coimbra
Paul Gilbert
Paul Gilbert University of Derby
Cristiana Duarte
Cristiana Duarte York St John University
Cláudia Ferreira
Cláudia Ferreira University of Coimbra
Berit L. Heitmann
Berit L. Heitmann Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy
Falko F. Sniehotta
Falko F. Sniehotta Newcastle University
Kirsten McEwan
Kirsten McEwan University of Derby
Marta M. Marques
Marta M. Marques Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública
James N. Kirby
James N. Kirby University of Queensland
David C. Zuroff
David C. Zuroff McGill University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology doesn’t just mean earning a traditional on-campus degree. Thanks to flexible online programs, students across the U.S. can now access high-quality education in counseling and psychology from anywhere. Cost is a major concern, making affordability an important factor when evaluating your options.

For students in the Southeast, the most affordable online counseling degree programs ranking in Florida and most affordable online counseling degree programs ranking in Georgia can help you find reputable, budget-friendly choices. If you’re considering studying on the West Coast, review the affordable online counseling degrees in Los Angeles or the comprehensive list of affordable online counseling master's programs in California.

Earning an online psychology or counseling degree can unlock various career pathways, from school counseling to clinical therapy or mental health support roles. With more universities now offering accredited online options, students can balance studies with work or family obligations—making a career in psychology more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Marcela Matos

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles