World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
50
Citations
8589
World Ranking
5030
National Ranking
1845

Mary C. Barth publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary C. Barth sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 181 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Mary C. Barth D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary C. Barth sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mary C. Barth is a researcher affiliated with the National Center for Atmospheric Research in the United States. Their work primarily focuses on the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science, with a strong emphasis on Atmospheric Science and Global and Planetary Change as subfields.

The researcher has contributed extensively to topics including:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Fire effects on ecosystems

Mary C. Barth has multiple frequent coauthors, indicating collaborative work in their research area. These colleagues include:

  • Rajesh Kumar
  • John J. Orlando
  • L. K. Emmons
  • Gabriele Pfister
  • Daven K. Henze

Their publications are often featured in prominent scientific journals. Frequent publication venues for Mary C. Barth include:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • Geoscientific model development

Recent publications of note include:

  • The acidity of atmospheric particles and clouds, 2020, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Acidity and the multiphase chemistry of atmospheric aqueous particles and clouds, 2021, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Comprehensive isoprene and terpene gas-phase chemistry improves simulated surface ozone in the southeastern US, 2020, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • The Multi-Scale Infrastructure for Chemistry and Aerosols (MUSICA), 2020, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Evaluating the Impact of Chemical Complexity and Horizontal Resolution on Tropospheric Ozone Over the Conterminous US With a Global Variable Resolution Chemistry Model, 2022, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems

Best Publications

  • The acidity of atmospheric particles and clouds

    Havala O. T. Pye;Athanasios Nenes;Becky Alexander;Andrew P. Ault

  • Sulfur chemistry in the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model: Description, evaluation, features, and sensitivity to aqueous chemistry

    M. C. Barth;P. J. Rasch;J. T. Kiehl;C. M. Benkovitz

  • Premature mortality in India due to PM2.5 and ozone exposure

    Sachin D. Ghude;D. M. Chate;C. Jena;G. Beig

  • Radiative forcing due to sulfate aerosols from simulations with the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model, Version 3

    J. T. Kiehl;T. L. Schneider;P. J. Rasch;M. C. Barth

  • On the prediction of air and pollutant exchange rates in street canyons of different aspect ratios using large-eddy simulation

    Chun-Ho Liu;Dennis Y.C. Leung;Mary C. Barth

  • A description of the global sulfur cycle and its controlling processes in the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model, Version 3

    Philip J. Rasch;Mary C. Barth;Jeffrey T. Kiehl;Stephen E. Schwartz

  • Impact of anthropogenic aerosols on Indian summer monsoon

    Chien Wang;Dongchul Kim;Dongchul Kim;Annica M. L. Ekman;Mary C. Barth

  • The Deep Convective Clouds and Chemistry (DC3) Field Campaign

    Mary C. Barth;Christopher A. Cantrell;William H. Brune;Steven A. Rutledge

  • WRF-Chem simulations of a typical pre-monsoon dust storm in northern India: influences on aerosol optical properties and radiation budget

    Rajesh Kumar;Mary Barth;Gabriele Pfister;M. Naja

  • Simulations over South Asia using the Weather Research and Forecasting model with Chemistry (WRF-Chem): chemistry evaluation and initial results

    R. Kumar;M. Naja;G. G. Pfister;M. C. Barth

  • Acidity and the multiphase chemistry of atmospheric aqueous particles and clouds.

    Andreas Tilgner;Thomas Schaefer;Becky Alexander;Mary Barth

  • Large-Eddy Simulation of Flow and Scalar Transport in a Modeled Street Canyon

    Chun-Ho Liu;Mary C. Barth

  • Large-Eddy Simulation of Flow and Pollutant Transport in Street Canyons of Different Building-Height-to-Street-Width Ratios

    Chun-Ho Liu;Mary C. Barth;Dennis Y. C. Leung

  • Estimation of total lightning from various storm parameters: A cloud-resolving model study

    Christelle Barthe;Christelle Barthe;Wiebke Deierling;Mary C. Barth

  • Upper tropospheric ozone production from lightning NOx-impacted convection: Smoke ingestion case study from the DC3 campaign

    E. C. Apel;R. S. Hornbrook;A. J. Hills;N. J. Blake

  • Numerical simulations of the July 10, 1996, Stratospheric-Tropospheric Experiment: Radiation, Aerosols, and Ozone (STERAO)-Deep Convection experiment storm: Redistribution of soluble tracers

    M. C. Barth;Amy L. Stuart;W. C. Skamarock

  • What controls the seasonal cycle of black carbon aerosols in India

    Rajesh Kumar;M. C. Barth;G. G. Pfister;V. S. Nair

  • An overview of the Stratospheric-Tropospheric Experiment: Radiation, Aerosols, and Ozone (STERAO)-Deep Convection experiment with results for the July 10, 1996 storm

    J. E. Dye;B. A. Ridley;W. Skamarock;M. Barth

  • Cloud-scale model intercomparison of chemical constituent transport in deep convection

    M. C. Barth;S.-W. Kim;S.-W. Kim;Chen Wang;K. E. Pickering;K. E. Pickering

  • WRF-Chem version 3.8.1 user's guide

    Steven E. Peckham;Georg Grell;Stuart A. McKeen;Ravan Ahmadov

Frequent Co-Authors

Gabriele Pfister
Gabriele Pfister National Center for Atmospheric Research
Kenneth E. Pickering
Kenneth E. Pickering University of Maryland, College Park
Si-Wan Kim
Si-Wan Kim Yonsei University
Jeff Peischl
Jeff Peischl Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences
Armin Wisthaler
Armin Wisthaler University of Oslo
Alan Fried
Alan Fried University of Colorado Boulder
Guy Brasseur
Guy Brasseur Max Planck Society
Tomas Mikoviny
Tomas Mikoviny University of Oslo
Manish Naja
Manish Naja Aryabhatta Research Institute of Observational Sciences
Ilana B. Pollack
Ilana B. Pollack Colorado State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their knowledge beyond Environmental Sciences, several online degree programs offer relevant skills and career flexibility. Public administration professionals can explore top online MPA programs that equip them with policy-making and management expertise beneficial for environmental governance roles. These programs provide a strong foundation for leadership in government or nonprofit sectors focused on sustainability.

Another complementary field is sociology, where students learn about societal dynamics and environmental justice issues. Pursuing the best online bachelor degree in sociology can open doors to research, community development, and advocacy careers that intersect with environmental concerns.

For educators and academic professionals, advancing through online EdD degrees without dissertation requirement offers a practical path to leadership roles within environmental education programs. These flexible programs emphasize applied learning and administrative skills, making them ideal for those focusing on environmental curriculum development or institutional sustainability initiatives.

Additionally, individuals holding an EdS degree may find online EdS to EdD bridge programs online a convenient option to elevate their qualifications. These pathways support career progression in education while allowing a focus on environmental topics, promoting a multidisciplinary approach to teaching and research.

Best Scientists Citing Mary C. Barth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles