World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ondřej Čadek

Ondřej Čadek

Ondřej Čadek publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ondřej Čadek sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Ondřej Čadek D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ondřej Čadek sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ondřej Čadek is affiliated with Charles University in the Czech Republic and is engaged primarily in research intersecting physics, astronomy, and earth and planetary sciences. Their scholarly contributions focus extensively on astro and planetary science, covering a broad range of topics including geomagnetism, paleomagnetism, planetary science and exploration, methane hydrates, geology, paleoclimatology, spacecraft technologies, and geological studies.

The scientist's work spans multiple subfields such as astronomy and astrophysics, molecular biology, environmental chemistry, atmospheric science, and aerospace engineering. These diverse interests reflect a multidisciplinary approach to understanding planetary bodies and their environments.

Čadek has contributed to several notable scientific publications. Key recent papers include:

  • A numerical model of convective heat transfer in Titan's subsurface ocean (2022, Icarus)
  • The density structure of Titan's outer ice shell (2021, Icarus)
  • The influence of heterogeneous seafloor heat flux on the cooling patterns of Ganymede's and Titan's subsurface oceans (2022, Icarus)
  • Seafloor hydrothermal control over ocean dynamics in Enceladus (2025, Nature Astronomy)
  • Topographic response to ocean heat flux anomaly on the icy moons of Jupiter and Saturn (2022, Icarus)

The publishing venues frequently hosting Čadek's research are:

  • Icarus
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Nature Astronomy
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Planets

Frequent collaborators include Burak Aygün, Jakub Kvorka, G. Choblet, G. Tobie, and Klára Kalousová. The recurring coauthorships suggest sustained collaborations that contribute to the continuity and depth of research outputs.

Ondřej Čadek's publication record shows a consistent engagement with advanced models and analyses of icy moons and subsurface oceans, mainly in the context of Saturn and Jupiter's planetary systems. Their work often examines thermal and geological processes such as convective heat transfer, ice shell density structures, heat flux variability, and hydrothermal controls, highlighting interconnected physical phenomena within planetary bodies.

Best Publications

  • Powering prolonged hydrothermal activity inside Enceladus

    Gaël Choblet;Gabriel Tobie;Christophe Sotin;Marie Běhounková

  • Enceladus's internal ocean and ice shell constrained from Cassini gravity, shape, and libration data

    Ondřej Čadek;Gabriel Tobie;Tim Van Hoolst;Tim Van Hoolst;Marion Massé

  • Solid tidal friction above a liquid water reservoir as the origin of the south pole hotspot on Enceladus

    G. Tobie;G. Tobie;O. Čadek;C. Sotin;C. Sotin;C. Sotin

  • Effect of lateral viscosity variations in the top 300 km on the geoid and dynamic topography

    O. Čadek;L. Fleitout

  • Inferences of viscosity from the oceanic geoid: indication of a low viscosity zone below the 660-km discontinuity

    M. Kido;O. Cadek

  • Tidally-induced melting events as the origin of south-pole activity on Enceladus

    Marie Běhounková;Gabriel Tobie;Gabriel Tobie;Gaël Choblet;Gaël Choblet;Ondřej Čadek

  • Long-term stability of Enceladus’ uneven ice shell

    Ondřej Čadek;Ondřej Souček;Marie Běhounková;Gaël Choblet

  • Geophysical inferences of thermal‐chemical structures in the lower mantle

    David A Yuen;O. Cadek;A. Chopelas;C. Matyska

  • Spherical harmonic expansion of the Earth's crustal thickness up to degree and order 30

    O. Čadek;Z. Martinec

  • Coupling mantle convection and tidal dissipation: Applications to Enceladus and Earth‐like planets

    Marie Běhounková;Gabriel Tobie;Gaël Choblet;Ondřej Čadek

  • Mantle viscosity derived by genetic algorithm using oceanic geoid and seismic tomography for whole-mantle versus blocked-flow situations

    Motoyuki Kido;David A Yuen;Ondřej Čadek;Tomoeki Nakakuki

  • Modeling the dynamic component of the geoid and topography of Venus

    M. Pauer;Kevin Fleming;O. Cadek

  • Effect of lateral viscosity variations in the core-mantle boundary region on predictions of the long-wavelength geoid

    O. Čadek;L. Fleitout

  • A global geoid model with imposed plate velocities and partial layering

    Ondřej Čadek;Luce Fleitout

  • Toroidal/poloidal energy partitioning and global lithospheric rotation during Cenozoic time

    Ondřej Čadek;Yanick Ricard

  • Lower mantle thermal structure deduced from seismic tomography, mineral physics and numerical modelling

    O. Cadek;D. A. Yuen;V. Steinbach;A. Chopelas

  • Scoria cones on Mars: Detailed investigation of morphometry based on high-resolution digital elevation models

    Petr Brož;Ondřej Čadek;Ernst Hauber;Angelo Pio Rossi

  • Ice melting and downward transport of meltwater by two-phase flow in Europa's ice shell

    Klára Kalousová;Klára Kalousová;Ondřej Souček;Ondřej Souček;Gabriel Tobie;Gaël Choblet

  • Bright carbonate surfaces on Ceres as remnants of salt-rich water fountains

    Ottavian Ruesch;Ottavian Ruesch;Lynnae Quick;Margaret Evelyn Landis;M.M. Sori

  • Timing of water plume eruptions on Enceladus explained by interior viscosity structure

    Marie Běhounková;Gabriel Tobie;Ondřej Čadek;Gaël Choblet

  • Tidally Induced Thermal Runaways on Extrasolar Earths: Impact on Habitability

    Marie Běhounková;Gabriel Tobie;Gaël Choblet;Ondřej Čadek

Frequent Co-Authors

David A. Yuen
David A. Yuen Columbia University
Christophe Sotin
Christophe Sotin Jet Propulsion Lab
Ernst Hauber
Ernst Hauber German Aerospace Center
Nicola Tosi
Nicola Tosi German Aerospace Center
Luce Fleitout
Luce Fleitout École Normale Supérieure
Ondrej Lexa
Ondrej Lexa Charles University
Karel Schulmann
Karel Schulmann University of Strasbourg
Shane Byrne
Shane Byrne University of Arizona
Christopher T. Russell
Christopher T. Russell University of California, Los Angeles
David A. Williams
David A. Williams University of California, Santa Cruz

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Earth Science opens doors to diverse career paths and complementary online degrees. For those interested in blending science with creativity, an mfa degree online can provide skills in communication and visualization, important for science outreach and education.

Management roles within environmental organizations often benefit from leadership skills gained through degrees like an online masters in human resource management. These programs help develop expertise in team building and organizational dynamics.

Additionally, for lifelong learners and professionals considering career shifts later in life, options such as open university free courses for over 60s offer accessible pathways to enhance knowledge without financial burden.

For individuals interested in data management and library sciences related to Earth Science research, choosing from top ala accredited mlis programs can provide valuable credentials to support data curation and information services.

Best Scientists Citing Ondřej Čadek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles