World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
43
Citations
7913
World Ranking
7048
National Ranking
2516

Conrad L. Ziegler publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Conrad L. Ziegler sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 107 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Conrad L. Ziegler D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Conrad L. Ziegler sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Conrad L. Ziegler is affiliated with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in the United States. Their research predominantly spans Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science. Their work is situated mainly within Atmospheric Science and Global and Planetary Change, with additional focus on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Oceanography, and Environmental Engineering.

The scientist's research covers several topics, primarily centered on meteorological phenomena and simulations. Other notable areas of their work include climate variability and models, atmospheric aerosols and clouds, lightning and electromagnetic phenomena, fire effects on ecosystems, tropical and extratropical cyclones research, and precipitation measurement and analysis.

Conrad L. Ziegler has published extensively in the following venues:

  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Monthly Weather Review
  • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society

Recent publications highlight diverse aspects of atmospheric science and meteorology. Notable papers include:

  • Microphysical and Transportive Contributions to Normal and Anomalous Polarity Subregions in the 29-30 May 2012 Kingfisher Storm (2020), Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • A Method for Correcting Staggered Pulse Repetition Time (PRT) and Dual Pulse Repetition Frequency (PRF) Processor Errors in Research Radar Datasets (2022), Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
  • Analysis of Hail Production via Simulated Hailstone Trajectories in the 29 May 2012 Kingfisher, Oklahoma, Supercell (2023), Monthly Weather Review
  • Evaluation of Lightning Flash Rate Parameterizations in a Cloud-Resolved WRF-Chem Simulation of the 29-30 May 2012 Oklahoma Severe Supercell System Observed During DC3 (2024), Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Lightning and Secondary Convection in the Anvil of the May 29, 2012 Oklahoma Supercell Storm Observed by DC3 (2020), Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres

The scientist frequently collaborates with a group of coauthors, including Michael I. Biggerstaff, Michael C. Coniglio, Donald R. MacGorman, Erik N. Rasmussen, and Adam L. Houston. These collaborators have contributed jointly on multiple projects, reflecting an involvement in cooperative research within the field.

Best Publications

  • Simulated Electrification of a Small Thunderstorm with Two-Moment Bulk Microphysics

    Edward R. Mansell;Conrad L. Ziegler;Eric C. Bruning

  • Charge structure and lightning sensitivity in a simulated multicell thunderstorm

    Edward R. Mansell;Donald R. MacGorman;Conrad L. Ziegler;Jerry M. Straka

  • Simulated three‐dimensional branched lightning in a numerical thunderstorm model

    Edward R. Mansell;Donald R. MacGorman;Conrad L. Ziegler;Jerry M. Straka

  • Single- and Multiple-Doppler Radar Observations of Tornadic Storms

    Peter S. Ray;Conrad L. Ziegler;William Bumgarner;Robert J. Serafin

  • Retrieval of Thermal and Microphysical Variables in Observed Convective Storms. Part 1: Model Development and Preliminary Testing

    Conrad L. Ziegler

  • The 2015 Plains Elevated Convection at Night Field Project

    Bart Geerts;David Parsons;Conrad L. Ziegler;Tammy M. Weckwerth

  • TELEX The Thunderstorm Electrification and Lightning Experiment

    Donald R. MacGorman;W. David Rust;Terry J. Schuur;Michael I. Biggerstaff

  • The Bow Echo and MCV Experiment: Observations and Opportunities

    Christopher A. Davis;Nolan Atkins;Diana Bartels;Diana Bartels;Lance Bosart

  • Aerosol Effects on Simulated Storm Electrification and Precipitation in a Two-Moment Bulk Microphysics Model

    Edward R. Mansell;Conrad L. Ziegler

  • The Deep Convective Clouds and Chemistry (DC3) Field Campaign

    Mary C. Barth;Christopher A. Cantrell;William H. Brune;Steven A. Rutledge

  • A model evaluation of noninductive graupel‐ice charging in the early electrification of a mountain thunderstorm

    Conrad L. Ziegler;Donald R. MacGorman;James E. Dye;Peter S. Ray

  • The Initiation of Moist Convection at the Dryline: Forecasting Issues from aCase Study Perspective

    Conrad L. Ziegler;Erik N. Rasmussen

  • A Lightning Parameterization for Numerical Cloud Models

    Donald R. MacGorman;Jerry M. Straka;Conrad L. Ziegler

  • THE SHARED MOBILE ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH AND TEACHING RADAR A Collaboration to Enhance Research and Teaching

    Michael I. Biggerstaff;Louis J. Wicker;Jerry Guynes;Conrad Ziegler

  • USE OF USGS‐PROVIDED DATA TO IMPROVE WEATHERAND CLIMATE SIMULATIONS

    R. A. Pielke;T. J. Lee;J. H. Copeland;J. L. Eastman

  • Application of a Lightning Data Assimilation Technique in the WRF-ARW Model at Cloud-Resolving Scales for the Tornado Outbreak of 24 May 2011

    Alexandre O. Fierro;Edward R. Mansell;Conrad L. Ziegler;Donald R. MacGorman

  • Convective Initiation at the Dryline: A Modeling Study

    Conrad L. Ziegler;Tsengdar J. Lee;Roger A. Pielke

  • The Implementation of an Explicit Charging and Discharge Lightning Scheme within the WRF-ARW Model: Benchmark Simulations of a Continental Squall Line, a Tropical Cyclone, and a Winter Storm

    Alexandre O. Fierro;Edward R. Mansell;Donald R. MacGorman;Conrad L. Ziegler

  • Numerically Simulated Electrification and Lightning of the 29 June 2000 STEPS Supercell Storm

    Kristin M. Kuhlman;Conrad L. Ziegler;Edward R. Mansell;Donald R. MacGorman

  • Polarimetric signatures in the stratiform region of a mesoscale convective system

    D. S. Zrnic;N. Balakrishnan;C. L. Ziegler;V. N. Bringi

Frequent Co-Authors

Donald R. MacGorman
Donald R. MacGorman University of Oklahoma
Jerry M. Straka
Jerry M. Straka University of Oklahoma
Lawrence D. Carey
Lawrence D. Carey University of Alabama in Huntsville
Kenneth E. Pickering
Kenneth E. Pickering University of Maryland, College Park
Mary C. Barth
Mary C. Barth National Center for Atmospheric Research
Roger A. Pielke
Roger A. Pielke University of Colorado Boulder
Morris L. Weisman
Morris L. Weisman National Center for Atmospheric Research
Alan Fried
Alan Fried University of Colorado Boulder
Robert M. Rauber
Robert M. Rauber University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Wen-Chau Lee
Wen-Chau Lee National Center for Atmospheric Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to a variety of related online degree programs that complement this field. For students seeking flexibility and budget-friendly options, exploring the most affordable online general studies degree programs can provide a broad educational foundation while keeping costs manageable.

When considering ease of completion alongside career goals, some students may gravitate towards degrees recognized as the easiest bachelor's degree to get. While less rigorous, these degrees still offer key skills relevant to environmental work, especially when paired with specialized knowledge.

For a more focused scientific approach, online geology programs provide in-depth understanding of earth processes crucial to environmental studies. These programs are ideal for those interested in land management, conservation, or natural resource exploration.

Additionally, careers in environmental assessment and spatial analysis benefit from expertise in geographic technology, making a gis degree an excellent choice. GIS skills are increasingly in demand for mapping and analyzing environmental data across diverse industries.

Best Scientists Citing Conrad L. Ziegler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles