World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
45
Citations
6628
World Ranking
6499
National Ranking
2328

Joshua Wurman publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joshua Wurman sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 109 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Joshua Wurman D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joshua Wurman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joshua Wurman is affiliated with the Center for Severe Weather Research in the United States. Their research spans several main fields including Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science, with particular focus on Atmospheric Science and Global and Planetary Change as subfields. The work also covers areas such as Environmental Engineering, Oceanography, and Astronomy and Astrophysics.

The scientist's research topics concentrate on Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations, Climate Variability and Models, Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research, Wind and Air Flow Studies, Fire Effects on Ecosystems, Atmospheric Aerosols and Clouds, and Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics.

Joshua Wurman has published in a range of scientific venues. Frequent publication outlets include the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Monthly Weather Review, Geophysical Research Letters, Weather and Forecasting, and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Some of their recent papers include:

  • A Storm Safari in Subtropical South America: Proyecto RELAMPAGO (2021, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society)
  • Characteristics of the Wind Field in Three Nontornadic Low-Level Mesocyclones Observed by the Doppler On Wheels Radars (2021, E-Journal of Severe Storms Meteorology)
  • Convective-Storm Environments in Subtropical South America from High-Frequency Soundings during RELAMPAGO-CACTI (2021, Monthly Weather Review)
  • Toward a Better Understanding of Wildfire Behavior in the Wildland-Urban Interface: A Case Study of the 2021 Marshall Fire (2023, Geophysical Research Letters)
  • Supercell tornadoes are much stronger and wider than damage-based ratings indicate (2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)

The researcher collaborates frequently with several coauthors, including Karen Kosiba, Paul Robinson, Stephen W. Nesbitt, Robert J. Trapp, and Matthew R. Kumjian.

Best Publications

  • Design and Deployment of a Portable, Pencil-Beam, Pulsed, 3-cm Doppler Radar

    Joshua Wurman;Jerry Straka;Erik Rasmussen;Mitch Randall

  • The 2015 Plains Elevated Convection at Night Field Project

    Bart Geerts;David Parsons;Conrad L. Ziegler;Tammy M. Weckwerth

  • Finescale Radar Observations of the Dimmitt, Texas (2 June 1995), Tornado

    Joshua Wurman;Swarndeep Gill

  • Intense sub-kilometer-scale boundary layer rolls observed in hurricane Fran

    Joshua Wurman;Jennifer Winslow

  • The Second Verification of the Origins of Rotation in Tornadoes Experiment: VORTEX2

    Joshua Wurman;David Dowell;Yvette Richardson;Paul Markowski

  • The 30 May 1998 Spencer, South Dakota, Storm. Part II: Comparison of Observed Damage and Radar-Derived Winds in the Tornadoes

    Joshua Wurman;Curtis R. Alexander

  • Diagnosed Three-Dimensional Axisymmetric Structure of the Mulhall Tornado on 3 May 1999

    Wen Chau Lee;Joshua Wurman

  • The Multiple-Vortex Structure of a Tornado

    Joshua M. Wurman

  • Low-Level Winds in Tornadoes and Potential Catastrophic Tornado Impacts in Urban Areas

    Joshua Wurman;Curtis Alexander;Paul Robinson;Yvette Richardson

  • Centrifuging of Hydrometeors and Debris in Tornadoes: Radar-Reflectivity Patterns and Wind-Measurement Errors

    David C. Dowell;Curtis R. Alexander;Joshua M. Wurman;Louis J. Wicker

  • Fine-Scale Doppler Radar Observations of Tornadoes

    Joshua Wurman;Jerry M. Straka;Erik N. Rasmussen

  • Genesis of the Goshen County, Wyoming, Tornado on 5 June 2009 during VORTEX2

    Karen Kosiba;Joshua Wurman;Yvette Richardson;Paul Markowski

  • Dual-Doppler and Single-Doppler Analysis of a Tornadic Storm Undergoing Mergers and Repeated Tornadogenesis

    Joshua Wurman;Yvette Richardson;Curtis Alexander;Stephen Weygandt

  • Tornado maintenance investigated with high-resolution Dual-Doppler and EnKF analysis

    James Marquis;Yvette Richardson;Paul Markowski;David Dowell

  • The 30 May 1998 Spencer, South Dakota, Storm. Part I: The Structural Evolution and Environment of the Tornadoes

    Curtis R. Alexander;Joshua Wurman

  • The Three-Dimensional Axisymmetric Wind Field Structure of the Spencer, South Dakota, 1998 Tornado

    Karen Kosiba;Joshua Wurman

  • Bistatic multiple-doppler radar network

    Charles Lawrence Frush;Joshua M. A. R. Wurman

  • The Pretornadic Phase of the Goshen County, Wyoming, Supercell of 5 June 2009 Intercepted by VORTEX2. Part II: Intensification of Low-Level Rotation

    Paul Markowski;Yvette Richardson;James Marquis;Robert Davies-Jones

  • Radar Observations of the 3 May 1999 Oklahoma City Tornado

    Donald W. Burgess;Michael A. Magsig;Joshua Wurman;David C. Dowell

  • In Situ, Doppler Radar, and Video Observations of the Interior Structure of a Tornado and the Wind–Damage Relationship

    Joshua Wurman;Karen Kosiba;Paul Robinson

  • THE SECOND VERIFICATION OF THE ORIGINS OF ROTATION IN TORNADOES EXPERIMENT

    Joshua Wurman;DaviD DoWell;yvette richarDson;Paul markoWski

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul Markowski
Paul Markowski Pennsylvania State University
Matthew R. Kumjian
Matthew R. Kumjian Pennsylvania State University
Jerry M. Straka
Jerry M. Straka University of Oklahoma
Wen-Chau Lee
Wen-Chau Lee National Center for Atmospheric Research
Howard B. Bluestein
Howard B. Bluestein University of Oklahoma
Robert M. Banta
Robert M. Banta National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
George S. Young
George S. Young Pennsylvania State University
Roger A. Pielke
Roger A. Pielke University of Colorado Boulder
Dusan S. Zrnic
Dusan S. Zrnic National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
V. Chandrasekar
V. Chandrasekar Colorado State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in environmental sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Programs like dsw online programs allow students to combine environmental advocacy with social work, addressing community impacts of environmental issues.

Students seeking flexibility might consider cheapest online general studies degree programs, which can provide a broad educational foundation while tailoring courses toward environmental topics.

For those looking for a degree with less intensive demands, exploring the easiest bachelor's degree programs could be beneficial. These options often blend well with environmental studies, equipping students with essential knowledge without overwhelming workloads.

Specialized fields, such as geology, are pivotal in environmental sciences. Earning a degree through geology degrees online programs can prepare graduates for careers focused on earth processes, resource management, and sustainability.

Best Scientists Citing Joshua Wurman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles