World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
45
Citations
14519
World Ranking
6238
National Ranking
2249

Morris L. Weisman publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Morris L. Weisman sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 76 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Morris L. Weisman D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Morris L. Weisman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Morris L. Weisman is affiliated with the National Center for Atmospheric Research in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences as well as Environmental Science, with a detailed emphasis on Atmospheric Science and issues related to Global and Planetary Change. Their work also intersects with Management, Monitoring, Policy, and Law within environmental contexts.

The scientist's key topics of study include Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations, Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research, Climate Variability and Models, and Landslides and Related Hazards.

Weisman has contributed to a select number of peer-reviewed publication venues, including:

  • Weather and Forecasting
  • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society

Notable recent papers by Morris L. Weisman are:

  • Simulations of Severe Convective Systems Using 1- versus 3-km Grid Spacing (2022), published in Weather and Forecasting
  • A Comparison of the Vorticity Dynamics Governing the Oceanic Bomb Cyclone of 4-5 January 1989 and the Super Derecho of 8 May 2009 (2020), published in Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
  • Earth, Wind, and Fire: Are Boulder's Extreme Downslope Winds Changing? (2025), published in Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society

The scholar collaborates frequently with a group of scientific peers, including Kevin W. Manning, Ryan A. Sobash, Craig S. Schwartz, Thomas J. Galarneau, and Gerald A. Meehl.

Best Publications

  • A Theory for Strong, Long-Lived Squall Lines

    Richard Rotunno;Joseph B. Klemp;Morris L. Weisman

  • The Dependence of Numerically Simulated Convective Storms on Vertical Wind Shear and Buoyancy

    M. L. Weisman;J. B. Klemp

  • The resolution dependence of explicitly modeled convective systems

    Morris L. Weisman;William C. Skamarock;Joseph B. Klemp

  • The structure and classification of numerically simulated convective storms in directionally varying wind shears

    Morris L. Weisman;Joseph B. Klemp

  • The next generation of NWP: explicit forecasts of convection using the weather research and forecasting (WRF) model

    James Done;Christopher A. Davis;Morris Weisman

  • Experiences with 0–36-h Explicit Convective Forecasts with the WRF-ARW Model

    Morris L. Weisman;Christopher Davis;Wei Wang;Kevin W. Manning

  • Some Practical Considerations Regarding Horizontal Resolution in the First Generation of Operational Convection-Allowing NWP

    John S. Kain;Steven J. Weiss;David R. Bright;Michael E. Baldwin

  • “A Theory for Strong Long-Lived Squall Lines” Revisited

    Morris L. Weisman;Richard Rotunno

  • Predicting Supercell Motion Using a New Hodograph Technique

    Matthew J. Bunkers;Brian A. Klimowski;Jon W. Zeitler;Richard L. Thompson

  • Structure and Evolution of Numerically Simulated Squall Lines

    Morris L. Weisman;Joseph B. Klemp;Richard Rotunno

  • The Genesis of Severe, Long-Lived Bow Echoes

    Morris L. Weisman

  • The Role of Convectively Generated Rear-Inflow Jets in the Evolution of Long-Lived Mesoconvective Systems

    Morris L. Weisman

  • Characteristics of Isolated Convective Storms

    Morris L. Weisman;Joseph B. Klemp

  • The Severe Thunderstorm Electrification and Precipitation Study

    Timothy J. Lang;L. Jay Miller;Morris Weisman;Steven A. Rutledge

  • Low-Level Mesovortices within Squall Lines and Bow Echoes. Part II: Their Genesis and Implications

    Robert J. Trapp;Morris L. Weisman

  • The Use of Vertical Wind Shear versus Helicity in Interpreting Supercell Dynamics

    Morris L. Weisman;Richard Rotunno

  • Low-Level Mesovortices within Squall Lines and Bow Echoes. Part I: Overview and Dependence on Environmental Shear

    Morris L. Weisman;Robert J. Trapp

  • Three-Dimensional Evolution of Simulated Long-Lived Squall Lines

    William C. Skamarock;Morris L. Weisman;Joseph B. Klemp

  • The Bow Echo and MCV Experiment: Observations and Opportunities

    Christopher A. Davis;Nolan Atkins;Diana Bartels;Diana Bartels;Lance Bosart

  • The Deep Convective Clouds and Chemistry (DC3) Field Campaign

    Mary C. Barth;Christopher A. Cantrell;William H. Brune;Steven A. Rutledge

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher A. Davis
Christopher A. Davis National Center for Atmospheric Research
Joseph B. Klemp
Joseph B. Klemp National Center for Atmospheric Research
Richard Rotunno
Richard Rotunno National Center for Atmospheric Research
Stanley B. Trier
Stanley B. Trier National Center for Atmospheric Research
Lance F. Bosart
Lance F. Bosart University at Albany, State University of New York
Conrad L. Ziegler
Conrad L. Ziegler National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Ilana B. Pollack
Ilana B. Pollack Colorado State University
Jeff Peischl
Jeff Peischl Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences
Donald R. MacGorman
Donald R. MacGorman University of Oklahoma
Juanzhen Sun
Juanzhen Sun National Center for Atmospheric Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences opens doors to various related fields that complement and expand career opportunities. For students seeking flexible options, understanding the what's the easiest bachelor's degree to get can help identify pathways that align with personal strengths while still maintaining relevance to environmental studies.

Geoscience and geology are closely connected to environmental science. Many institutions offer top-quality programs, and those interested should consider the best online geology degree for a thorough understanding of Earth's physical processes—an important component of environmental analysis.

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) are critical tools in environmental research and planning. Students can enhance their skill set by pursuing one of the best gis undergraduate programs, preparing for careers in spatial data analysis and resource management.

For those looking toward leadership roles in environmental policy and administration, online Master of Public Administration (MPA) programs offer valuable organizational and governmental insights. The online mpa degrees are ideal for advancing managerial skills in environmental agencies and nonprofits.

Best Scientists Citing Morris L. Weisman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles