World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
69
Citations
15123
World Ranking
1807
National Ranking
760

Lance F. Bosart publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lance F. Bosart sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 268 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Lance F. Bosart D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lance F. Bosart sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Lance F. Bosart is affiliated with the University at Albany, State University of New York in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a concentration in Environmental Science. Within these domains, their work touches on multiple subfields including Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Environmental Engineering, Computational Mechanics, and Oceanography.

The scientist's research addresses a variety of topics, notably:

  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Climate variability and models
  • Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Precipitation Measurement and Analysis

They have contributed frequently to several publication venues, with the most common being:

  • Monthly Weather Review
  • Journal of Climate
  • Weather and Forecasting
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

Representative recent papers by Lance F. Bosart include:

  • Extreme Rainfall in Taiwan: Seasonal Statistics and Trends (2021, Journal of Climate)
  • A Feature-Based Approach to Classifying Summertime Potential Vorticity Streamers Linked to Rossby Wave Breaking in the North Atlantic Basin (2020, Journal of Climate)
  • Composite Synoptic-Scale Environments Conducive to North American Polar-Subtropical Jet Superposition Events (2020, Monthly Weather Review)
  • A Climatological Analysis of the Linkages between Tropopause Polar Vortices, Cold Pools, and Cold Air Outbreaks over the Central and Eastern United States (2020, Monthly Weather Review)
  • Mesoscale Gravity Waves and Midlatitude Weather: A Tribute to Fuqing Zhang (2021, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society)

Frequent collaborators in their work include:

  • Daniel Keyser
  • Lexi Henny
  • Chris D. Thorncroft
  • Craig R. Ferguson
  • K. Biernat

Lance F. Bosart's contributions have been recognized with the title of Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) awarded in 2013.

Best Publications

  • The extratropical transition of tropical cyclones : forecast challenges, current understanding, and future directions

    Sarah C. Jones;Patrick A. Harr;Jim Abraham;Lance F. Bosart

  • Monitoring and Understanding Trends in Extreme Storms: State of Knowledge

    Kenneth E. Kunkel;Thomas R. Karl;Harold Brooks;James Kossin

  • The Presidents' Day Snowstorm of 18–19 February 1979: A Subsynoptic-Scale Event

    Lance F. Bosart

  • Appalachian Cold-Air Damming

    Gerald D. Bell;Lance F. Bosart

  • Impacts of wind farms on land surface temperature

    Liming Zhou;Yuhong Tian;Somnath Baidya Roy;Chris Thorncroft

  • Environmental Influences on the Rapid Intensification of Hurricane Opal (1995) over the Gulf of Mexico

    Lance F. Bosart;W. Edward Bracken;John Molinari;Christopher S. Velden

  • The Extratropical Transition and Precipitation Distribution of Hurricane Floyd (1999)

    Eyad H. Atallah;Lance F. Bosart

  • The Johnstown Flood of July 1977: A Long-Lived Convective System

    Lance F. Bosart;Frederick Sanders

  • A Diagnostic Analysis of the Presidents' Day Storm Of February 1979

    Lance F. Bosart;Song C. Lin

  • The Bow Echo and MCV Experiment: Observations and Opportunities

    Christopher A. Davis;Nolan Atkins;Diana Bartels;Diana Bartels;Lance Bosart

  • Predecessor Rain Events ahead of Tropical Cyclones

    Thomas J. Galarneau;Lance F. Bosart;Russ S. Schumacher

  • Postlandfall Tropical Cyclone Reintensification in a Weakly Baroclinic Environment: A Case Study of Hurricane David (September 1979)

    Lance F. Bosart;Gary M. Lackmann

  • Quantitative Precipitation Forecasting: Report of the Eighth Prospectus Development Team, U.S. Weather Research Program

    J. M. Fritsch;Robert A. Houze;R. Adler;H. Bluestein

  • The Effect of Large-Scale Flow on Low-Level Frontal Structure and Evolution in Midlatitude Cyclones

    David M. Schultz;Daniel Keyser;Lance F. Bosart

  • Baroclinically Induced Tropical Cyclogenesis

    Christopher A. Davis;Lance F. Bosart

  • The Transformation of Tropical Storm Agnes into an Extratropical Cyclone. Part I: The Observed Fields and Vertical Motion Computations

    Geoffrey J. DiMego;Lance F. Bosart

  • The extratropical transition of tropical cyclones. Part I: Cyclone evolution and direct impacts

    Clark Evans;Kimberly M. Wood;Sim D. Aberson;Heather M. Archambault

  • Precipitation Distribution Associated with Landfalling Tropical Cyclones over the Eastern United States

    Eyad Atallah;Lance F. Bosart;Anantha R. Aiyyer

  • The Pre-Depression Investigation of Cloud-Systems in the Tropics (PREDICT) Experiment: Scientific Basis, New Analysis Tools, and Some First Results

    Michael T. Montgomery;Christopher Davis;Timothy Dunkerton;Zhuo Wang

  • The 1993 Superstorm Cold Surge: Frontal Structure, Gap Flow, and Tropical Impact

    David M. Schultz;W. Edward Bracken;Lance F. Bosart;Gregory J. Hakim

  • The importance of the task in analyzing expert judgment

    Thomas R. Stewart;Paul J. Roebber;Lance F. Bosart

  • Mesoscale Structure in the Megalopolitan Snowstorm of 11–12 February 1983. Part I: Frontogenetical Forcing and Symmetric Instability

    Frederick Sanders;Lance F. Bosart

  • Monitoring and Understanding Trends in Extreme Storms: State of Knowledge

    Kenneth E. Kunkel;Thomas R. Karl;Harold Brooks;James P. Kossin

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher A. Davis
Christopher A. Davis National Center for Atmospheric Research
John R. Gyakum
John R. Gyakum McGill University
Gregory J. Hakim
Gregory J. Hakim University of Washington
Fuqing Zhang
Fuqing Zhang Pennsylvania State University
Morris L. Weisman
Morris L. Weisman National Center for Atmospheric Research
Chris D. Thorncroft
Chris D. Thorncroft University at Albany, State University of New York
Olivia Martius
Olivia Martius University of Bern
Richard E. Orville
Richard E. Orville Texas A&M University
W. James Steenburgh
W. James Steenburgh University of Utah

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can provide valuable interdisciplinary skills. An online bachelors in sociology is a great option to understand societal factors that influence environmental policies and community behaviors.

Professionals aiming for leadership roles in education or environmental advocacy might consider advanced degrees. Online doctoral programs like the online ed d programs without dissertation offer flexible pathways to deepen your knowledge without the traditional research barrier.

For educators or administrators seeking career growth, transitioning through eds to edd program pathways provides a streamlined approach to attaining a terminal degree in education with a focus on leadership and policy.

Those passionate about social welfare and environmental justice should also consider affordable advanced social work degrees. The cheapest dsw program offers a cost-effective route to a doctorate in social work, enhancing your ability to impact both communities and ecosystems.

Best Scientists Citing Lance F. Bosart

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles