World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
46
Citations
8119
World Ranking
18931
National Ranking
1477

Peter N. Cockerill publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter N. Cockerill sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 131 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Peter N. Cockerill D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter N. Cockerill sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter N. Cockerill is affiliated with the University of Birmingham in the United Kingdom. Their research spans several areas within biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology with a specific focus on hematology and immunology. The work predominantly addresses mechanisms relevant to leukemia and immune cell differentiation.

The scientist's research interests include acute myeloid leukemia, protein degradation and inhibitors, epigenetics and DNA methylation, genomics and chromatin dynamics, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, histone deacetylase inhibitors, and T-cell and B-cell immunology.

Frequent co-authors in their publications include Constanze Bonifer, Peter Keane, Salam A. Assi, Sophie G. Kellaway, and Paulynn Suyin Chin.

Peter N. Cockerill has published several papers in notable journals. Examples of recent papers include:

  • Leukemic stem cells activate lineage inappropriate signalling pathways to promote their growth, 2024, Nature Communications
  • Epigenetic regulator genes direct lineage switching in MLL/AF4 leukemia, 2022, Blood
  • Isoform-specific and signaling-dependent propagation of acute myeloid leukemia by Wilms tumor 1, 2021, Cell Reports
  • IL-2/IL-7-inducible factors pioneer the path to T cell differentiation in advance of lineage-defining factors, 2020, The EMBO Journal
  • Chromatin Priming Renders T Cell Tolerance-Associated Genes Sensitive to Activation below the Signaling Threshold for Immune Response Genes, 2020, Cell Reports

Peter N. Cockerill's work has been published in journals such as Experimental Hematology, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Nature Communications, Cell Reports, and Blood.

The main fields of study covered in their publications include biochemistry, genetics and molecular biology as well as medicine. These encompass subfields like molecular biology, hematology, immunology, public health, environmental and occupational health, and oncology.

Best Publications

  • Chromosomal loop anchorage of the kappa immunoglobulin gene occurs next to the enhancer in a region containing topoisomerase II sites

    Peter N. Cockerill;William T. Garrard

  • Tumor necrosis factor-alpha induces adhesion molecule expression through the sphingosine kinase pathway.

    Pu Xia;Jennifer R. Gamble;Kerry-Anne Rye;Lijun Wang

  • Derepression of an endogenous long terminal repeat activates the CSF1R proto-oncogene in human lymphoma

    Björn Lamprecht;Korden Walter;Stephan Kreher;Stephan Kreher;Raman Kumar

  • The enhancer of the immunoglobulin heavy chain locus is flanked by presumptive chromosomal loop anchorage elements.

    P N Cockerill;M H Yuen;W T Garrard

  • Wellington: a novel method for the accurate identification of digital genomic footprints from DNase-seq data

    Jason Piper;Markus C. Elze;Pierre Cauchy;Peter N. Cockerill

  • The granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor/interleukin 3 locus is regulated by an inducible cyclosporin A-sensitive enhancer.

    P N Cockerill;M F Shannon;A G Bert;G R Ryan

  • Depletion of RUNX1/ETO in t(8;21) AML cells leads to genome-wide changes in chromatin structure and transcription factor binding

    A Ptasinska;S A Assi;D Mannari;S R James

  • A simplified method for quantitation of the relative amounts of type I and type III collagen in small tissue samples

    Geoffrey J. Laurent;Peter Cockerill;Robin J. McAnulty;Jeremy R.B. Hastings

  • The LPS-induced transcriptional upregulation of the chicken lysozyme locus involves CTCF eviction and noncoding RNA transcription.

    Pascal Lefevre;James Witham;Claire E. Lacroix;Peter N. Cockerill

  • Subtype-specific regulatory network rewiring in acute myeloid leukemia

    Salam A. Assi;Maria Rosaria Imperato;Daniel J. L. Coleman;Anna Pickin

  • Human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor enhancer function is associated with cooperative interactions between AP-1 and NFATp/c.

    P N Cockerill;A G Bert;F Jenkins;G R Ryan

  • Structure and function of active chromatin and DNase I hypersensitive sites

    Peter N. Cockerill

  • Chromosomal loop anchorage sites appear to be evolutionarily conserved.

    Peter N. Cockerill;William T. Garrard

  • Identification of a Dynamic Core Transcriptional Network in t(8;21) AML that Regulates Differentiation Block and Self-Renewal

    Anetta Ptasinska;Salam A. Assi;Salam A. Assi;Natalia Martinez-Soria;Maria Rosaria Imperato

  • Regulation of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and E- selectin expression in endothelial cells by cyclosporin A and the T- cell transcription factor NFAT

    Gillian W. Cockerill;Andrew G. Bert;Gregory R. Ryan;Jennifer R. Gamble

  • A T Cell–Specific Enhancer in the Interleukin-3 Locus Is Activated Cooperatively by Oct and NFAT Elements within a DNase I–Hypersensitive Site

    Kym N. Duncliffe;Andrew G. Bert;Mathew Alexander Vadas;Peter N. Cockerill

  • Inducible chromatin priming is associated with the establishment of immunological memory in T cells.

    Sarah L Bevington;Pierre Cauchy;Jason Piper;Elisabeth Bertrand

  • Prospective Isolation and Characterization of Genetically and Functionally Distinct AML Subclones

    Bauke de Boer;Janine Prick;Maurien G. Pruis;Peter Keane

  • Signals for Activation of the GM-CSF Promoter and Enhancer in T Cells

    M F Shannon;L S Coles;M A Vadas;P N Cockerill

  • The Oncogenic Transcription Factor RUNX1/ETO Corrupts Cell Cycle Regulation to Drive Leukemic Transformation.

    Natalia Martinez-Soria;Lynsey McKenzie;Julia Draper;Anetta Ptasinska

Frequent Co-Authors

Constanze Bonifer
Constanze Bonifer University of Birmingham
Mathew A. Vadas
Mathew A. Vadas University of Sydney
Daniel G. Tenen
Daniel G. Tenen National University of Singapore
Graham H. Goodwin
Graham H. Goodwin Institute of Cancer Research
David R. Withers
David R. Withers University of Birmingham
Simon Bailey
Simon Bailey Royal Victoria Infirmary
Jennifer R. Gamble
Jennifer R. Gamble University of Sydney
Matthew Collin
Matthew Collin Newcastle University
Ruud Delwel
Ruud Delwel Erasmus MC
Reiner Siebert
Reiner Siebert University of Ulm

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing studies in Biology and Biochemistry opens doors to a variety of academic and professional opportunities. Many students explore specialized options like registered dietitian masters programs, which blend biological sciences with nutrition and health. These programs can be ideal for those interested in clinical and healthcare settings.

For those looking for a faster entry into healthcare, medical assistant programs offer flexible, online options with financial aid available. Graduates can further advance their careers by considering cma to lpn bridge programs online, which allow certified medical assistants to become licensed practical nurses through accessible pathways.

Additionally, students wanting a broad understanding of life sciences can pursue online biology degree programs. Accelerated formats enable faster career progression or entry into graduate school. By exploring these related programs, students can find the right path that matches their interests and long-term goals in biology and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Peter N. Cockerill

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles