World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Medicine
Singapore
2026
Award Badge
Biology and Biochemistry
Singapore
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 132 2329 2171 8 8 557 59326

Daniel G. Tenen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Daniel G. Tenen between 1975 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Daniel G. Tenen published across 51 years, from 1975 to 2025, averaging 14.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 99 publications in 2023. 84 of the 722 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1975 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 99. Peak 99 publications in 2023. 1975: 2 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 2 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 1 publication 1983: 2 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 9 publications 1993: 10 publications 1994: 10 publications 1995: 10 publications 1996: 10 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 15 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 17 publications 2005: 25 publications 2006: 36 publications 2007: 24 publications 2008: 21 publications 2009: 18 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 22 publications 2013: 26 publications 2014: 33 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 28 publications 2021: 29 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 99 publications 2024: 66 publications 2025: 18 publications
1975 2025

722 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Daniel G. Tenen: publications per year, 1975 to 2025
Year Publications
1975 2
1976 1
1977 2
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 1
1982 1
1983 2
1984 0
1985 1
1986 0
1987 0
1988 3
1989 6
1990 5
1991 3
1992 9
1993 10
1994 10
1995 10
1996 10
1997 6
1998 6
1999 7
2000 4
2001 6
2002 15
2003 13
2004 17
2005 25
2006 36
2007 24
2008 21
2009 18
2010 11
2011 20
2012 22
2013 26
2014 33
2015 17
2016 11
2017 17
2018 17
2019 22
2020 28
2021 29
2022 12
2023 99
2024 66
2025 18
Total 722
Download as CSV

Daniel G. Tenen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel G. Tenen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 541–560 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 557 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537 557
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Daniel G. Tenen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel G. Tenen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 132–133 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 132 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168 132
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Medicine in Singapore Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Medicine in Singapore Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Biology and Biochemistry in Singapore Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Biology and Biochemistry in Singapore Leader Award

Overview

Daniel G. Tenen is affiliated with the National University of Singapore in Singapore. Their research spans multiple fields primarily focused on biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with significant contributions to medicine. The main areas of study include molecular biology, immunology, hematology, cancer research, and oncology.

The scientist's work concentrates on topics including RNA modifications and cancer, epigenetics and DNA methylation, renal and related cancers, cancer-related gene regulation, acute myeloid leukemia research, genomics and chromatin dynamics, and RNA research and splicing.

Frequent publication venues for Daniel G. Tenen include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Blood, Cancer Research, Nature Communications, and SSRN Electronic Journal.

Recent notable papers authored or co-authored by Daniel G. Tenen are:

  • Patients with Cancer Appear More Vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2: A Multicenter Study during the COVID-19 Outbreak, 2020, Cancer Discovery
  • EGFR signaling pathway as therapeutic target in human cancers, 2022, Seminars in Cancer Biology
  • APOE4 impairs the microglial response in Alzheimer's disease by inducing TGFβ-mediated checkpoints, 2023, Nature Immunology
  • NanoVar: accurate characterization of patients' genomic structural variants using low-depth nanopore sequencing, 2020, Genome biology
  • ZNF143 mediates CTCF-bound promoter-enhancer loops required for murine hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell function, 2021, Nature Communications

Daniel G. Tenen collaborates frequently with other researchers. Their frequent co-authors include Li Chai, Mahmoud A. Bassal, Henry Yang, Annalisa Di Ruscio, and Bon Q. Trinh.

Best Publications

  • EGFR Mutation and Resistance of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer to Gefitinib

    Susumu Kobayashi;Titus J. Boggon;Tajhal Dayaram;Pasi A. Jänne

  • Single-Cell Transcriptomics of Human and Mouse Lung Cancers Reveals Conserved Myeloid Populations across Individuals and Species.

    Rapolas Zilionis;Rapolas Zilionis;Camilla Engblom;Christina Pfirschke;Virginia Savova

  • Dominant-negative mutations of CEBPA , encoding CCAAT/enhancer binding protein-α (C/EBPα), in acute myeloid leukemia

    Thomas Pabst;Beatrice U. Mueller;Pu Zhang;Hanna S. Radomska

  • Transcription factors, normal myeloid development, and leukemia.

    Daniel G. Tenen;Robert Hromas;Jonathan D. Licht;Dong-Er Zhang

  • Disruption of differentiation in human cancer: AML shows the way

    Daniel G Tenen

  • Transcription factors in myeloid development: balancing differentiation with transformation.

    Frank Rosenbauer;Daniel G. Tenen

  • Enhancement of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Repopulating Capacity and Self-Renewal in the Absence of the Transcription Factor C/EBPα

    Pu Zhang;Junko Iwasaki-Arai;Hiromi Iwasaki;Maris L. Fenyus

  • CCAAT/enhancer binding protein alpha is a regulatory switch sufficient for induction of granulocytic development from bipotential myeloid progenitors

    Hanna S. Radomska;Claudia S. Huettner;Pu Zhang;Tao Cheng

  • Acute myeloid leukemia induced by graded reduction of a lineage-specific transcription factor, PU.1.

    Frank Rosenbauer;Katharina Wagner;Jeffery L Kutok;Hiromi Iwasaki

  • AML1-ETO downregulates the granulocytic differentiation factor C/EBPalpha in t(8;21) myeloid leukemia.

    Thomas Pabst;Beatrice U. Mueller;Nari Harakawa;Claudia Schoch

  • Negative cross-talk between hematopoietic regulators: GATA proteins repress PU.1.

    Pu Zhang;Gerhard Behre;Jing Pan;Atsushi Iwama

  • BIM Mediates EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor-Induced Apoptosis in Lung Cancers with Oncogenic EGFR Mutations

    Daniel Botelho Costa;Balázs Halmos;Amit Kumar;Susan T Schumer

  • DNMT1-interacting RNAs block gene-specific DNA methylation

    Annalisa Di Ruscio;Alexander K. Ebralidze;Touati Benoukraf;Giovanni Amabile

  • Distinctive and indispensable roles of PU.1 in maintenance of hematopoietic stem cells and their differentiation.

    Hiromi Iwasaki;Chamorro Somoza;Hirokazu Shigematsu;Estelle A. Duprez

  • The impact of human EGFR kinase domain mutations on lung tumorigenesis and in vivo sensitivity to EGFR-targeted therapies

    Hongbin Ji;Danan Li;Liang Chen;Takeshi Shimamura

  • The macrophage transcription factor PU.1 directs tissue-specific expression of the macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor.

    Dong-Er Zhang;C. J. Hetherington;Hui-Min Chen;D. G. Tenen

  • Recoding RNA editing of AZIN1 predisposes to hepatocellular carcinoma

    Leilei Chen;Yan Li;Chi Ho Lin;Tim Hon Man Chan;Tim Hon Man Chan

  • Hematopoietic stem cell and multilineage defects generated by constitutive beta-catenin activation

    Marina Scheller;Joerg Huelsken;Frank Rosenbauer;Makoto Mark Taketo

  • Mutations of the transcription factor PU.1 are not associated with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

    B U Mueller;T Pabst;P Hauser;G Gilliland

Frequent Co-Authors

Koichi Akashi
Koichi Akashi Kyushu University
Henry Yang
Henry Yang National University of Singapore
Ruud Delwel
Ruud Delwel Erasmus MC
Hong Zhang
Hong Zhang Chinese Academy of Sciences
Constanze Bonifer
Constanze Bonifer University of Birmingham
Carsten Müller-Tidow
Carsten Müller-Tidow University Hospital Heidelberg
Steven J. Ackerman
Steven J. Ackerman University of Illinois at Chicago
Dietger Niederwieser
Dietger Niederwieser Leipzig University
Wolfgang Hiddemann
Wolfgang Hiddemann Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Atsushi Iwama
Atsushi Iwama University of Tokyo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering studying Medicine in the USA, there are several alternative degrees and career pathways within the healthcare field to explore. For example, many students look into entry level msn programs online designed for non-nurses. These accelerated programs allow those with a non-nursing bachelor’s degree to swiftly transition into nursing roles, meeting healthcare demands.

Admission standards can vary widely across programs. Some students seek out nursing programs with high acceptance rates, which offer a more accessible route into the profession. Others opt for schools that simplify entry requirements. Asking yourself, do you have to take the teas test to get into nursing school is important, as some programs waive these standardized exams.

For those interested in healthcare administration, online medical billing and coding with financial aid is an in-demand option. These online programs provide flexibility, financial support, and a pathway into essential healthcare support roles. Whichever direction you choose, online degrees and flexible admission policies make pursuing a career in healthcare more achievable than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel G. Tenen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles