World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Geoffrey F. Miller

Geoffrey F. Miller

Last Updated:

D-Index & Metrics

?
Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 54 4507 4170 2502 2263 102 17486

Geoffrey F. Miller publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Geoffrey F. Miller between 1988 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Geoffrey F. Miller published across 37 years, from 1988 to 2024, averaging 3.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2007. 10 of the 125 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2007. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 5 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 19 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 3 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 2 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 7 publications
1988 2024

125 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Geoffrey F. Miller: publications per year, 1988 to 2024
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 1
1990 1
1991 5
1992 0
1993 3
1994 6
1995 2
1996 0
1997 5
1998 4
1999 3
2000 5
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 2
2005 2
2006 9
2007 19
2008 5
2009 9
2010 5
2011 3
2012 9
2013 3
2014 3
2015 1
2016 3
2017 1
2018 2
2019 0
2020 3
2021 0
2022 0
2023 3
2024 7
Total 125
Download as CSV

Geoffrey F. Miller publications per year - data summary

  • Geoffrey F. Miller, a Psychology scholar from University of New Mexico, has 125 publications recorded across 37 years, from 1988 to 2024.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1988 and the most recent to 2024.
  • The most productive year is 2007, with 19 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1988, 1989, 1990, 2015 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 8 of the 37 years in the span carry no publications at all (1992, 1996, 2001, 2002 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 3.4 papers per year over the whole span, or 4.3 per year counting only the 29 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2020-2024) hold 13 publications, 10% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1988-2000: 36 publications (2.8 per year); 2001-2013: 66 publications (5.1 per year); 2014-2024: 23 publications (2.1 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is broadly steady.

Geoffrey F. Miller publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geoffrey F. Miller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 102 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 102
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Geoffrey F. Miller publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Geoffrey F. Miller, a Psychology scholar from University of New Mexico, records 102 publications - the 21st percentile of the discipline.
  • 21% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Geoffrey F. Miller, and about 79% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Geoffrey F. Miller ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Geoffrey F. Miller D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geoffrey F. Miller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 54
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Geoffrey F. Miller D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Geoffrey F. Miller, a Psychology scholar from University of New Mexico, records 54 D-Index - the 61st percentile of the discipline.
  • 61% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Geoffrey F. Miller, and about 39% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Geoffrey F. Miller ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Geoffrey F. Miller is affiliated with the University of New Mexico in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields including Psychology, Neuroscience, and Social Sciences, with particular focus on subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, and the History and Philosophy of Science.

The main topics addressed in Miller's work include Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior, Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment, Philosophy and History of Science, Academic integrity and plagiarism, Misinformation and Its Impacts, Communication in Education and Healthcare, and Academic Freedom and Politics.

Recent papers by Miller cover diverse themes and have appeared in several reputable journals. Notable recent publications include:

  • "Prosocial motives underlie scientific censorship by scientists: A perspective and research agenda" (2023) in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Taboos and Self-Censorship Among U.S. Psychology Professors" (2024) in Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • "The ten-million-year explosion: Paleocognitive reconstructions of domain-general cognitive ability (G) in extinct primates" (2023) in Intelligence
  • "Anti-Mertonian norms undermine the scientific ethos: A critique of Bird, Jackson Jr., and Winston's policy proposals and associated justification" (2024) in Intelligence
  • "Content meta-analysis of a racial hereditarian research "bibliography" reveals minimal support for Bird, Jackson Jr., and Winston's model of "scientific racism"" (2024) in Intelligence

Miller frequently collaborates with other researchers. Regular coauthors include Connie J. Clark, Komi Frey, Roy F. Baumeister, Stephen J. Ceci, and Wendy M. Williams.

Their publications are often featured in journals such as Intelligence, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Perspectives on Psychological Science, The Quarterly Review of Biology, and Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

Best Publications

  • The Mating Mind: How Sexual Choice Shaped the Evolution of Human Nature

    Geoffrey Miller

  • Designing neural networks using genetic algorithms

    Geoffrey F. Miller;Peter M. Todd;Shailesh U. Hegde

  • Blatant benevolence and conspicuous consumption: When romantic motives elicit strategic costly signals.

    Vladas Griskevicius;Joshua M. Tybur;Jill M. Sundie;Robert B. Cialdini

  • The Smartphone Psychology Manifesto

    Geoffrey Miller

  • The evolutionary genetics of personality

    Lars Penke;Jaap J. A. Denissen;Geoffrey F. Miller

  • Resolving the paradox of common, harmful, heritable mental disorders: which evolutionary genetic models work best?

    Matthew C. Keller;Geoffrey Miller

  • Evolution of human music through sexual selection.

    Geoffrey Miller

  • Mate choice turns cognitive

    Geoffrey F Miller;Peter M Todd

  • Ovulatory cycle effects on tip earnings by lap-dancers: Economic evidence for human estrus?

    Geoffrey Miller;Joshua M. Tybur;Brent D. Jordan

  • Sexual selection for moral virtues.

    Geoffrey F. Miller

  • Spent: Sex, Evolution, and Consumer Behavior

    Geoffrey Miller

  • Women's fertility across the cycle increases the short-term attractiveness of creative intelligence.

    Martie G. Haselton;Geoffrey F. Miller

  • How mate choice shaped human nature: A review of sexual selection and human evolution.

    Geoffrey F. Miller

  • Tracking the Red Queen: Measurements of Adaptive Progress in Co-Evolutionary Simulations

    Dave Cliff;Geoffrey F. Miller

  • Intelligence tests with higher g-loadings show higher correlations with body symmetry: Evidence for a general fitness factor mediated by developmental stability

    Mark D. Prokosch;Ronald A. Yeo;Geoffrey F. Miller

  • Accurate judgments of intention from motion cues alone: A cross-cultural study

    H. Clark Barrett;Peter M. Todd;Geoffrey F. Miller;Philip W. Blythe

  • Humor ability reveals intelligence, predicts mating success, and is higher in males.

    Gil Greengross;Geoffrey F. Miller

  • Sexual selection for indicators of intelligence.

    Geoffrey Miller

  • From pride and prejudice to persuasion : Satisficing in mate search

    Peter M. Todd;Geoffrey F. Miller

  • Dissing Oneself versus Dissing Rivals: Effects of Status, Personality, and Sex on the Short-Term and Long-Term Attractiveness of Self-Deprecating and Other-Deprecating Humor

    Gil Greengross;Geoffrey F. Miller

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter M. Todd
Peter M. Todd Indiana University
Joshua M. Tybur
Joshua M. Tybur Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Jim Mintz
Jim Mintz The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Jaap J. A. Denissen
Jaap J. A. Denissen Utrecht University
Lars Penke
Lars Penke University of Göttingen
Martie G. Haselton
Martie G. Haselton University of California, Los Angeles
Linda S. Gottfredson
Linda S. Gottfredson University of Delaware
Rod A. Martin
Rod A. Martin University of Western Ontario
Steven W. Gangestad
Steven W. Gangestad University of New Mexico
Nicholas G. Martin
Nicholas G. Martin QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing psychology in the USA can open doors to a variety of rewarding online degrees and career pathways, especially in mental health counseling. Many institutions now offer flexible online programs that help students balance personal commitments while working toward a meaningful career. As you consider your options, it’s important to understand local requirements and state-specific pathways.

For example, to meet Toledo mental health counselor education requirements, you'll need a combination of specific coursework and supervised clinical hours. Similarly, if you plan to practice in Arizona, check out what’s needed to how to become a mental health counselor in Tucson.

Requirements differ by city and state. Those hoping to become a mental health counselor in Tulsa will find unique licensing steps, while understanding mental health counselor requirements in Virginia Beach is essential if practicing in Virginia.

No matter your destination, online psychology degrees offer flexibility and specialization to help you begin your counseling journey. Always research state regulations and choose accredited programs to ensure your credentials will be recognized wherever you want to work.

Best Scientists Citing Geoffrey F. Miller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles