World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
41
Citations
6546
World Ranking
5086
National Ranking
861

Chris Sandbrook publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chris Sandbrook sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 302 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 86 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Chris Sandbrook D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chris Sandbrook sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 261 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Chris Sandbrook is a researcher affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. Their primary field of study is Environmental Science, with a significant focus on subfields such as Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Geography, Planning and Development, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

Their research covers a range of topics, including:

  • Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Geographies of human-animal interactions
  • Environmental Education and Sustainability
  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Zoonotic diseases and public health
  • Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact

Chris Sandbrook has published papers in several journals, with a frequent presence in the following venues:

  • Oryx
  • Conservation Biology
  • People and Nature
  • Geoforum
  • Conservation Letters

Their recent academic publications include:

  • The minimum land area requiring conservation attention to safeguard biodiversity (2022, Science)
  • Making more effective use of human behavioural science in conservation interventions (2021, Biological Conservation)
  • Imagining transformative biodiversity futures (2020, Nature Sustainability)
  • Principles for the socially responsible use of conservation monitoring technology and data (2021, Conservation Science and Practice)
  • Order of meals at the counter and distance between options affect student cafeteria vegetarian sales (2020, Nature Food)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Chris Sandbrook include:

  • Andrew Balmford
  • Emma Garnett
  • Theresa M. Marteau
  • Douglas A. Clark
  • Trishant Simlai

Best Publications

  • When and how to use Q methodology to understand perspectives in conservation research.

    Aiora Zabala;Chris Sandbrook;Chris Sandbrook;Nibedita Mukherjee

  • Community management of natural resources in Africa: impacts, experiences and future directions.

    Dilys Roe;Chris Sandbrook;Fred Nelson

  • Half-Earth or Whole Earth? Radical ideas for conservation, and their implications

    Bram Büscher;Robert Fletcher;Dan Brockington;Chris Sandbrook

  • The minimum land area requiring conservation attention to safeguard biodiversity

    Unknown

  • The social implications of using drones for biodiversity conservation.

    Chris Sandbrook

  • Carbon, forests and the REDD paradox.

    Chris Sandbrook;Fred Nelson;William M. Adams;Arun Agrawal

  • Conservation, evidence and policy

    William. M. Adams;Chris Sandbrook

  • Impact of increasing vegetarian availability on meal selection and sales in cafeterias.

    Emma E Garnett;Andrew Balmford;Chris Sandbrook;Mark A Pilling

  • Elasticity in ecosystem services: exploring the variable relationship between ecosystems and human well-being

    Tim M. Daw;Christina C. Hicks;Katrina Brown;Tomas Chaigneau

  • Location, location, location: considerations when using lightweight drones in challenging environments

    James P. Duffy;Andrew M. Cunliffe;Leon DeBell;Chris Sandbrook;Chris Sandbrook

  • The global conservation movement is diverse but not divided

    Chris Sandbrook;Chris Sandbrook;Janet A. Fisher;George Holmes;Rogelio Luque-Lora

  • Protecting half of the planet could directly affect over one billion people

    Judith Schleicher;Julie G. Zaehringer;Julie G. Zaehringer;Constance Fastré;Bhaskar Vira

  • Social research and biodiversity conservation.

    Christopher Sandbrook;Christopher Sandbrook;William Adams;Bram Büscher;Bhaskar Vira

  • Putting leakage in its place: The significance of retained tourism revenue in the local context in Rural Uganda

    Chris G. Sandbrook

  • Pokémon Go: Benefits, Costs, and Lessons for the Conservation Movement

    Leejiah J. Dorward;John C. Mittermeier;Chris Sandbrook;Chris Sandbrook;Fiona Spooner

  • Value Plurality among Conservation Professionals

    Chris Sandbrook;Ivan R. Scales;Bhaskar Vira;William M. Adams

  • Tourism revenue sharing policy at Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Uganda: a policy arrangements approach

    W.M. Ahebwa;V.R. van der Duim;C. Sandbrook

  • Expanding the role of social science in conservation through an engagement with philosophy, methodology and methods

    Katie Moon;Katie Moon;Deborah A. Blackman;Vanessa M. Adams;Rebecca M. Colvin

  • Digital Games and Biodiversity Conservation

    Chris Sandbrook;Chris Sandbrook;William M. Adams;Bruno Monteferri

  • Understanding conservationists’ perspectives on the new-conservation debate

    George Holmes;Chris Sandbrook;Chris Sandbrook;Janet A. Fisher

  • Local economic impact of different forms of nature‐based tourism

    Chris. G. Sandbrook

  • What is conservation

    Chris Sandbrook

Frequent Co-Authors

Dilys Roe
Dilys Roe International Institute for Environment and Development
William M. Adams
William M. Adams University of Cambridge
Theresa M. Marteau
Theresa M. Marteau University of Cambridge
Beatrice Crona
Beatrice Crona Stockholm University
Arun Agrawal
Arun Agrawal University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Bram Büscher
Bram Büscher Wageningen University & Research
Rosaleen Duffy
Rosaleen Duffy University of Sheffield
Christina C. Hicks
Christina C. Hicks Lancaster University
Lisa M. Campbell
Lisa M. Campbell Duke University
Brendan Fisher
Brendan Fisher University of Vermont

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degree options in Social Sciences and Humanities can open doors to meaningful and flexible career paths. Many students seek the most affordable online msw programs to launch careers in social work while balancing personal commitments. For those interested in working with individuals with behavioral challenges, pursuing the cheapest bcba online program offers a cost-effective entry into becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst.

Time is also a key consideration. Students who wish to fast-track their careers can opt for 1 year msw programs online, allowing them to qualify for advanced roles sooner. Similarly, for those interested in psychology, choosing an accelerated bachelor's degree in psychology is a popular pathway to complete studies quickly and pursue diverse professional opportunities.

By selecting the right online degree program, students can tailor their education to fit both their budget and their career timeline, ensuring a smooth transition into rewarding fields in the social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Chris Sandbrook

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles