World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 48 3791 3474 426 395 213 9150

Daniela N Schmidt publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Daniela N Schmidt between 1998 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Daniela N Schmidt published across 29 years, from 1998 to 2026, averaging 10 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2024. 17 of the 291 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2024. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 15 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 20 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 24 publications 2025: 16 publications 2026: 1 publication
1998 2026

291 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Daniela N Schmidt: publications per year, 1998 to 2026
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 0
2000 1
2001 1
2002 2
2003 4
2004 15
2005 3
2006 6
2007 9
2008 16
2009 14
2010 20
2011 8
2012 12
2013 14
2014 19
2015 11
2016 15
2017 5
2018 11
2019 16
2020 10
2021 10
2022 15
2023 12
2024 24
2025 16
2026 1
Total 291
Download as CSV

Daniela N Schmidt publications per year - data summary

  • Daniela N Schmidt, a Earth Science scholar from University of Bristol, has 291 publications recorded across 29 years, from 1998 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1998 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2024, with 24 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1998, 2000, 2001 and 2026, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 29 years in the span carries no publications at all (1999).
  • The rate of publication averages 10.0 papers per year over the whole span, or 10.4 per year counting only the 28 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 68 publications, 23% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1998-2007: 42 publications (4.2 per year); 2008-2017: 134 publications (13.4 per year); 2018-2026: 115 publications (12.8 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Daniela N Schmidt publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniela N Schmidt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 208–217 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 213 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292 213
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Daniela N Schmidt publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 9,176 Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 38–47 to 603+ publications.
  • Daniela N Schmidt, a Earth Science scholar from University of Bristol, records 213 publications - the 68th percentile of the discipline.
  • 68% of ranked Earth Science scientists score the same or lower than Daniela N Schmidt, and about 32% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 168–177 publications range, and Daniela N Schmidt ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 128–137 publications, holding 557 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 58% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 178–187 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 603 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Daniela N Schmidt D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniela N Schmidt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207 48
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Daniela N Schmidt D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 9,176 Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 77 ranges running from 30 to 106+ D-Index.
  • Daniela N Schmidt, a Earth Science scholar from University of Bristol, records 48 D-Index - the 60th percentile of the discipline.
  • 60% of ranked Earth Science scientists score the same or lower than Daniela N Schmidt, and about 40% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 44 D-Index range, and Daniela N Schmidt ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 36 D-Index, holding 389 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 62% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 49 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Daniela N Schmidt is affiliated with the University of Bristol in the United Kingdom. Their research spans across multiple areas within Earth and Environmental Sciences, with a strong emphasis on Earth and Planetary Sciences as well as Environmental Science.

Their work extensively covers several subfields including Atmospheric Science, Oceanography, Ecology, Paleontology, and Global and Planetary Change. The main topics of their research include:

  • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Marine Biology and Ecology Research
  • Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
  • Isotope Analysis in Ecology
  • Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
  • Marine and coastal ecosystems

A selection of recent publications illustrates the scope of their research interests and contributions:

  • "A framework for complex climate change risk assessment," 2021, One Earth
  • "Lithium isotope evidence for enhanced weathering and erosion during the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum," 2021, Science Advances
  • "Planktic Foraminiferal Test Size and Weight Response to the Late Pliocene Environment," 2020, Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology
  • "Adaptation pathways for effective responses to climate change risks," 2024, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change
  • "100 million years of turtle paleoniche dynamics enable the prediction of latitudinal range shifts in a warming world," 2022, Current Biology

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Andy Ridgwell (9 joint publications)
  • Heather Birch (8 joint publications)
  • Dick Kroon (7 joint publications)
  • Ruby Barrett (7 joint publications)
  • Fanny Monteiro (7 joint publications)

Daniela N Schmidt's work has been published in a range of scientific venues, with repeated contributions to:

  • Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology (6 publications)
  • Publishing Network for Geoscientific and Environmental Data (PANGAEA) (5 publications)
  • Zenodo (4 publications)
  • Biogeosciences (3 publications)
  • Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America (3 publications)

Best Publications

  • The Geological Record of Ocean Acidification

    Bärbel Hönisch;Andy Ridgwell;Daniela N. Schmidt;Ellen Thomas;Ellen Thomas

  • Alkenone and boron based Pliocene pCO2 records

    Osamu Seki;Osamu Seki;Gavin L. Foster;Daniela N. Schmidt;Andreas Mackensen

  • A framework for complex climate change risk assessment

    Nicholas P. Simpson;Katharine J. Mach;Andrew Constable;Jeremy Hess

  • Plio-Pleistocene climate sensitivity evaluated using high-resolution CO2 records

    Miguel A. Martínez-Botí;Gavin L Foster;Tom B. Chalk;Eelco J Rohling

  • Deep-time Perspectives on Climate Change: Marrying the Signal from Computer Models and Biological Proxies

    M Williams;AM Haywood;FJ Gregory;Daniela N Schmidt

  • Boron isotopes and B/Ca in benthic foraminifera: proxies for the deep ocean carbonate system

    James W.B. Rae;Gavin L. Foster;Daniela N. Schmidt;Tim Elliott

  • Climate model and proxy data constraints on ocean warming across the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum

    Tom Dunkley Jones;Daniel J. Lunt;Daniela N. Schmidt;Andy Ridgwell

  • Past constraints on the vulnerability of marine calcifiers to massive carbon dioxide release

    Andy J Ridgwell;Daniela N Schmidt

  • The future of the northeast Atlantic benthic flora in a high CO2 world

    Juliet Brodie;Christopher J Williamson;Christopher J Williamson;Dan A Smale;Nicholas A Kamenos

  • Size distribution of Holocene planktic foraminifer assemblages: biogeography, ecology and adaptation

    Daniela N Schmidt;Sabrina Renaud;Jörg Bollmann;Ralf Schiebel

  • Rapid ocean acidification and protracted Earth system recovery followed the end-Cretaceous Chicxulub impact.

    Michael J. Henehan;Andy Ridgwell;Andy Ridgwell;Ellen Thomas;Ellen Thomas;Shuang Zhang

  • Modelling the oxygen isotope distribution of ancient seawater using a coupled ocean–atmosphere GCM: Implications for reconstructing early Eocene climate

    Julia Tindall;Rachel Flecker;Paul Valdes;Daniela N. Schmidt

  • Microhabitat preferences and stable carbon isotopes of endobenthic Foraminifera: clue to quantitative reconstruction of oceanic new production?

    A Mackensen;S Schumacher;J Radke;Daniela N Schmidt

  • From laboratory manipulations to Earth system models: scaling calcification impacts of ocean acidification

    A. Ridgwell;D. N. Schmidt;C. Turley;C. Brownlee

  • Abiotic forcing of plankton evolution in the Cenozoic.

    Daniela N. Schmidt;Hans R. Thierstein;Jörg Bollmann;Ralf Schiebel

  • Biogeography and evolution of body size in marine plankton

    Daniela N. Schmidt;Daniela N. Schmidt;David Lazarus;Jeremy R. Young;Michal Kucera

  • A core top assessment of proxies for the ocean carbonate system in surface‐dwelling foraminifers

    Yunyan Ni;Gavin L. Foster;Trevor Bailey;Tim Elliott

  • Gradual and sustained carbon dioxide release during Aptian Oceanic Anoxic Event 1a

    B. D. A. Naafs;J. M. Castro;G. A. De Gea;M. L. Quijano

  • CO2-driven ocean circulation changes as an amplifier of Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum hydrate destabilization

    Daniel J. Lunt;Daniel J. Lunt;Paul J. Valdes;Tom Dunkley Jones;Andy Ridgwell

  • Lithium isotope evidence for enhanced weathering and erosion during the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum.

    Philip A. E. Pogge von Strandmann;Philip A. E. Pogge von Strandmann;Morgan T. Jones;A. Joshua West;Melissa J. Murphy;Melissa J. Murphy

  • The societal challenge of ocean acidification

    C. Turley;M. Eby;Andy J Ridgwell;Daniela N Schmidt

  • Impacts of ocean acidification

    Phillip Williamson;Carol Turely;Colin Brownlee;Helen Findlay

Frequent Co-Authors

Andy Ridgwell
Andy Ridgwell University of California, Riverside
Ellen Thomas
Ellen Thomas Yale University
Jörg Bollmann
Jörg Bollmann University of Toronto
Gavin L. Foster
Gavin L. Foster University of Southampton
Sabrina Renaud
Sabrina Renaud Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Tim Elliott
Tim Elliott University of Bristol
Derek Vance
Derek Vance ETH Zurich
Carol Turley
Carol Turley Plymouth Marine Laboratory
Paul J. Valdes
Paul J. Valdes University of Bristol

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in expanding their knowledge beyond Earth Science, there are various related online degrees that offer exciting career opportunities. For instance, those drawn to information management can explore reputable programs like the ala mlis programs, which are widely recognized in the library and information science field.

Considering whether is library science a good career? It often provides stable employment with diverse roles such as archivists, data managers, and research specialists, making it a strong option for Earth Science graduates seeking interdisciplinary skills.

For those with a creative side, combining science with visual storytelling is possible through online photography degrees. Exploring the cheapest online photography degree options can help students pursue affordable education to capture geological landscapes or environmental phenomena.

Military veterans interested in leveraging their discipline in a new field may benefit from tailored programs, such as the online photography degree for military veterans, which offer flexible learning paths and support services designed for their unique needs.

Best Scientists Citing Daniela N Schmidt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles