World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
49
Citations
7758
World Ranking
18089
National Ranking
7395

Lisa W. Seeb publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa W. Seeb sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 130 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Lisa W. Seeb D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa W. Seeb sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lisa W. Seeb is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Environmental Science.

The scientist's work spans several subfields of study, including Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Molecular Biology, and Immunology. Their main topics of research cover Genetic diversity and population structure, Fish Ecology and Management Studies, Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock, Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies, Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies, Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals, and Aquaculture disease management and microbiota.

Frequently publishing in journals such as Molecular Ecology and the North American Journal of Fisheries Management, Lisa W. Seeb also has contributions in G3 Genes Genomes Genetics, PLoS ONE, and Evolutionary Applications.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Lisa W. Seeb include:

  • Network Analysis of Linkage Disequilibrium Reveals Genome Architecture in Chum Salmon, 2020, G3 Genes Genomes Genetics
  • The pink salmon genome: Uncovering the genomic consequences of a two-year life cycle, 2021, PLoS ONE
  • Y-chromosome haplotypes are associated with variation in size and age at maturity in male Chinook salmon, 2020, Evolutionary Applications
  • Conserved islands of divergence associated with adaptive variation in sockeye salmon are maintained by multiple mechanisms, 2023, Molecular Ecology
  • A New Genotyping-in-Thousands-by-Sequencing Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Panel for Mixed-Stock Analysis of Chum Salmon from Coastal Western Alaska, 2022, North American Journal of Fisheries Management

Lisa W. Seeb has collaborated frequently with several researchers throughout their career, including:

  • James E. Seeb
  • Garrett J. McKinney
  • Carita E. Pascal
  • Kris A. Christensen
  • Éric Rondeau

Best Publications

  • Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) discovery and applications of SNP genotyping in nonmodel organisms.

    J. E. Seeb;G. Carvalho;L. Hauser;K. Naish

  • Development of a Standardized DNA Database for Chinook Salmon

    L. W. Seeb;A. Antonovich;Michael A. Banks;T. D. Beacham

  • An empirical comparison of SNPs and microsatellites for parentage and kinship assignment in a wild sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) population.

    Lorenz Hauser;Melissa Baird;Ray Hilborn;Lisa W. Seeb

  • CONCORDANCE OF GENETIC DIVERGENCE AMONG SOCKEYE SALMON POPULATIONS AT ALLOZYME, NUCLEAR DNA, AND MITOCHONDRIAL DNA MARKERS

    F. W. Allendorf;L. W. Seeb

  • Hatchery Reform in Washington State

    Lars E. Mobrand;John Barr;Lee Blankenship;Donald E. Campton

  • Managing fisheries using genetic data: case studies from four species of Pacific salmon

    James B Shaklee;Terry D Beacham;Lisa Seeb;Bruce A White

  • SPAM (version 3.2): statistics program for analyzing mixtures.

    EM Debevec;RB Gates;M Masuda;J Pella

  • Genotyping by sequencing resolves shallow population structure to inform conservation of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha)

    Wesley A. Larson;Lisa W. Seeb;Meredith V. Everett;Ryan K. Waples

  • Differentiating salmon populations at broad and fine geographical scales with microsatellites and single nucleotide polymorphisms.

    S. R. Narum;M. Banks;T. D. Beacham;M. R. Bellinger

  • Paralogs are revealed by proportion of heterozygotes and deviations in read ratios in genotyping-by-sequencing data from natural populations.

    Garrett J. McKinney;Ryan K. Waples;Lisa W. Seeb;James E. Seeb

  • Use of sequence data from rainbow trout and Atlantic salmon for SNP detection in Pacific salmon

    Christian T. Smith;Carita M. Elfstrom;Lisa W. Seeb;James E. Seeb

  • Genetic Population Structure of Chum Salmon in the Pacific Rim Inferred from Mitochondrial DNA Sequence Variation

    Shunpei Sato;Hiroyuki Kojima;Junko Ando;Hironori Ando

  • Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) under Diversifying Selection Provide Increased Accuracy and Precision in Mixed-Stock Analyses of Sockeye Salmon from the Copper River, Alaska

    Michael W. Ackerman;Christopher Habicht;Lisa W. Seeb

  • RADseq provides unprecedented insights into molecular ecology and evolutionary genetics: comment on Breaking RAD by Lowry et al. (2016).

    Garrett J. McKinney;Wesley A. Larson;Lisa W. Seeb;James E. Seeb

  • High Genetic Heterogeneity in Chum Salmon in Western Alaska, the Contact Zone between Northern and Southern Lineages

    Lisa W. Seeb;Penelope A. Crane

  • Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms Provide Rapid and Accurate Estimates of the Proportions of U.S. and Canadian Chinook Salmon Caught in Yukon River Fisheries

    Christian T. Smith;William D. Templin;James E. Seeb;Lisa W. Seeb

  • Migration of Pacific Rim chum salmon on the high seas: insights from genetic data

    Lisa W. Seeb;Penelope A. Crane;Penelope A. Crane;Christine M. Kondzela;Richard L. Wilmot

  • SNP genotyping by the 5'-nuclease reaction: advances in high-throughput genotyping with nonmodel organisms.

    James E. Seeb;Carita E. Pascal;Ramesh Ramakrishnan;Lisa W. Seeb

  • Allozymes and mitochondrial DNA discriminate Asian and north American populations of chum salmon in mixed-stock fisheries along the south coast of the Alaska peninsula

    Lisa W. Seeb;Penelope A. Crane

  • Single nucleotide polymorphisms across a species' range: implications for conservation studies of Pacific salmon.

    L. W. Seeb;L. W. Seeb;W. D. Templin;S. Sato;S. Abe

Frequent Co-Authors

James E. Seeb
James E. Seeb University of Washington
Daniel E. Schindler
Daniel E. Schindler University of Washington
Lorenz Hauser
Lorenz Hauser University of Washington
Terry D. Beacham
Terry D. Beacham Fisheries and Oceans Canada
Thomas P. Quinn
Thomas P. Quinn University of Washington
Shawn R. Narum
Shawn R. Narum University of Idaho
Fred W. Allendorf
Fred W. Allendorf University of Montana
Ray Hilborn
Ray Hilborn University of Washington
Chris Harrod
Chris Harrod University of Glasgow
Gary H. Thorgaard
Gary H. Thorgaard Washington State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry can open doors to a variety of related career paths in healthcare and the life sciences. The modern workforce is seeing increased demand for flexible, online qualifications, allowing students to combine study with work or family commitments.

For those interested in direct patient care, online associate rn programs provide an accessible route into nursing, with programs designed to prepare graduates for RN licensure. If you're passionate about health, food, and wellness, pursuing an online bachelor's in nutrition can lead to roles in dietetics, research, or education.

Management roles in healthcare are in high demand, and the top cahme accredited mha programs offer graduate-level training to prepare students for leadership in a variety of health organizations. For those seeking an advanced nursing degree, flexible online dnp programs without clinicals can be ideal for advancing careers in policy, education, and administration.

Choosing the right online program can help you align your education with long-term goals in Biology, Biochemistry, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Lisa W. Seeb

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles