World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Ecology and Evolution 39 6327 6106 2147 2058 139 6917

Lorenz Hauser publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lorenz Hauser between 1980 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lorenz Hauser published across 46 years, from 1980 to 2025, averaging 3.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2017. 4 of the 144 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2017. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 3 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 1 publication
1980 2025

144 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lorenz Hauser: publications per year, 1980 to 2025
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 1
1992 1
1993 0
1994 1
1995 3
1996 1
1997 0
1998 3
1999 1
2000 3
2001 4
2002 4
2003 5
2004 0
2005 5
2006 7
2007 7
2008 8
2009 6
2010 4
2011 7
2012 5
2013 8
2014 6
2015 4
2016 8
2017 9
2018 6
2019 5
2020 3
2021 7
2022 5
2023 2
2024 3
2025 1
Total 144
Download as CSV

Lorenz Hauser publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lorenz Hauser sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 37–41 to 531+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 333. Most scientists, 333, have 97–101 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 137–141 publications, is where this scientist sits. 37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37–41 publications 531+

This scientist: 139 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Ecology and Evolution scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 8,381 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
37–41 2
42–46 9
47–51 10
52–56 31
57–61 56
62–66 91
67–71 92
72–76 127
77–81 173
82–86 236
87–91 227
92–96 240
97–101 333
102–106 280
107–111 300
112–116 285
117–121 305
122–126 287
127–131 278
132–136 289
137–141 273 139
142–146 262
147–151 246
152–156 235
157–161 205
162–166 199
167–171 174
172–176 164
177–181 173
182–186 189
187–191 170
192–196 139
197–201 128
202–206 117
207–211 115
212–216 107
217–221 124
222–226 81
227–231 82
232–236 85
237–241 75
242–246 66
247–251 81
252–256 69
257–261 70
262–266 55
267–271 64
272–276 49
277–281 48
282–286 44
287–291 45
292–296 36
297–301 39
302–306 38
307–311 30
312–316 34
317–321 25
322–326 22
327–331 28
332–336 30
337–341 22
342–346 30
347–351 26
352–356 22
357–361 29
362–366 21
367–371 12
372–376 18
377–381 17
382–386 13
387–391 21
392–396 13
397–401 10
402–406 15
407–411 8
412–416 9
417–421 8
422–426 4
427–431 10
432–436 10
437–441 5
442–446 4
447–451 10
452–456 2
457–461 4
462–466 7
467–471 7
472–476 6
477–481 6
482–486 3
487–491 3
492–496 4
497–501 4
502–506 8
507–511 5
512–516 4
517–521 5
522–526 4
527–530 5
531+ 100
Download as CSV

Lorenz Hauser D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lorenz Hauser sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 92 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 121+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 280. Most scientists, 280, have 40 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Ecology and Evolution scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 8,381 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 95
31 123
32 191
33 245
34 252
35 244
36 249
37 244
38 254
39 254 39
40 280
41 274
42 266
43 233
44 248
45 208
46 201
47 213
48 207
49 172
50 209
51 199
52 153
53 169
54 163
55 148
56 120
57 146
58 137
59 140
60 104
61 119
62 118
63 99
64 77
65 100
66 86
67 83
68 75
69 94
70 57
71 68
72 59
73 63
74 66
75 60
76 42
77 49
78 39
79 37
80 43
81 41
82 45
83 34
84 40
85 35
86 55
87 24
88 24
89 30
90 23
91 25
92 27
93 27
94 13
95 23
96 12
97 14
98 19
99 16
100 14
101 5
102 21
103 16
104 10
105 7
106 7
107 7
108 6
109 9
110 11
111 12
112 9
113 7
114 3
115 8
116 5
117 11
118 4
119 2
120 5
121+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Lorenz Hauser is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their research predominantly focuses on the intersection of genetics and environmental science, with significant contributions in biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and related subfields. Their scientific work spans areas such as genetics, global and planetary change, molecular biology, aquatic science, and ecology.

The research topics Hauser addresses include:

  • Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Marine bivalve and aquaculture studies
  • Identification and quantification in food
  • Fish ecology and management studies
  • Marine and fisheries research
  • Aquaculture nutrition and growth

Hauser has published extensively in several scientific venues. The most frequent publication outlets include:

  • Ecology and Evolution
  • Scientific Reports
  • PLoS ONE
  • Marine Ecology Progress Series
  • Evolutionary Applications

Notable recent publications by Hauser cover a range of marine and genetic topics. These include:

  • "Functional genetic diversity in an exploited marine species and its relevance to fisheries management," 2021, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • "Confirmation of the shell-boring oyster parasite Polydora websteri (Polychaeta: Spionidae) in Washington State, USA," 2020, Scientific Reports
  • "Generation of a chromosome-level genome assembly for Pacific halibut (Hippoglossus stenolepis) and characterization of its sex-determining genomic region," 2022, Molecular Ecology Resources
  • "Power of a dual-use SNP panel for pedigree reconstruction and population assignment," 2020, Ecology and Evolution
  • "Genetic structure and dispersal in peripheral populations of a marine fish (Pacific cod, Gadus macrocephalus) and their importance for adaptation to climate change," 2021, Ecology and Evolution

Hauser collaborates regularly with several researchers, including:

  • Eleni L. Petrou
  • Carolyn Tarpey
  • Isadora Jiménez-Hidalgo
  • Daniel P. Drinan
  • Ingrid Spies

This body of work highlights Lorenz Hauser's involvement in integrating genetic research with ecological and environmental contexts, particularly in marine species and aquaculture-related studies.

Best Publications

  • Genome divergence in two Prochlorococcus ecotypes reflects oceanic niche differentiation

    Gabrielle Rocap;Frank W. Larimer;Frank W. Larimer;Jane Lamerdin;Stephanie Malfatti

  • Paradigm shifts in marine fisheries genetics: ugly hypotheses slain by beautiful facts

    Lorenz Hauser;Gary R Carvalho

  • Loss of microsatellite diversity and low effective population size in an overexploited population of New Zealand snapper (Pagrus auratus)

    Lorenz Hauser;Greg J. Adcock;Peter J. Smith;Julio H. Bernal Ramírez

  • Molecular genetics and the stock concept in fisheries

    G. R. Carvalho;L. Hauser

  • Burkholderia xenovorans LB400 harbors a multi-replicon, 9.73-Mbp genome shaped for versatility

    Patrick S. G. Chain;Vincent J. Denef;Konstantinos T. Konstantinidis;Konstantinos T. Konstantinidis;Lisa M. Vergez;Lisa M. Vergez

  • Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) discovery and applications of SNP genotyping in nonmodel organisms.

    J. E. Seeb;G. Carvalho;L. Hauser;K. Naish

  • An empirical comparison of SNPs and microsatellites for parentage and kinship assignment in a wild sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) population.

    Lorenz Hauser;Melissa Baird;Ray Hilborn;Lisa W. Seeb

  • Inbreeding depression and genetic load of sexually selected traits: how the guppy lost its spots.

    C. Van Oosterhout;R. E. Trigg;G. R. Carvalho;A. E. Magurran

  • An empirical verification of population assignment methods by marking and parentage data: hatchery and wild steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in Forks Creek, Washington, USA.

    L. Hauser;T. R. Seamons;M. Dauer;K. A. Naish

  • Advances in molecular technology and their impact on fisheries genetics

    Lorenz Hauser;James E Seeb

  • Genetic isolation by distance and localized fjord population structure in Pacific cod (Gadus macrocephalus): limited effective dispersal in the northeastern Pacific Ocean

    Kathryn Maja CunninghamK.M. Cunningham;Kathryn Maja CunninghamK.M. Cunningham;Michael Francis CaninoM.F. Canino;Michael Francis CaninoM.F. Canino;Ingrid Brigette SpiesI.B. Spies;Ingrid Brigette SpiesI.B. Spies;Lorenz HauserL. Hauser;Lorenz HauserL. Hauser

  • The status of sandy beach science: Past trends, progress, and possible futures

    Ronel Nel;Eileen E. Campbell;Linda Harris;Lorenz Hauser

  • Advances in the molecular analysis of fish population structure

    Gary R. Carvalho;Lorenz Hauser

  • Molecular genetics and the stock concept in fisheries

    Unknown

  • Multiple ice-age refugia in Pacific cod, Gadus macrocephalus.

    Michael F. Canino;Ingrid B. Spies;Kathryn M. Cunningham;Lorenz Hauser

  • Local adaptation limits lifetime reproductive success of dispersers in a wild salmon metapopulation.

    Daniel A. Peterson;Daniel A. Peterson;Ray Hilborn;Lorenz Hauser

  • Macro- and micro-geographic variation in pantophysin (PanI) allele frequencies in NE Atlantic cod Gadus morhua

    R. A. J. Case;W. F. Hutchinson;L. Hauser;C. Van Oosterhout

  • Bacterial phylogenetic diversity and a novel candidate division of two humid region, sandy surface soils

    Jizhong Zhou;Jizhong Zhou;Beicheng Xia;Heshu Huang;David S. Treves

  • Genetic evidence of a northward range expansion in the eastern Bering Sea stock of Pacific cod.

    Ingrid Spies;Kristen M. Gruenthal;Kristen M. Gruenthal;Daniel P. Drinan;Anne B. Hollowed

  • Sequencing of Multiple Clostridial Genomes Related to Biomass Conversion and Biofuel Production

    Christopher L. Hemme;Housna Mouttaki;Yong Jin Lee;Gengxin Zhang

  • Fine-scale differentiation between sockeye salmon ecotypes and the effect of phenotype on straying.

    J Lin;T P Quinn;R Hilborn;L Hauser

  • Variability in condition and growth of Atlantic cod larvae and juveniles reared in mesocosms: environmental and maternal effects

    Catriona Clemmesen;Vivian Bühler;G. Carvalho;R. Case

  • High Potential for Using DNA from Ancient Herring Bones to Inform Modern Fisheries Management and Conservation

    Camilla F. Speller;Camilla F. Speller;Lorenz Hauser;Dana Lepofsky;Jason Moore

  • Functional genetic diversity in an exploited marine species and its relevance to fisheries management

    Eleni L. Petrou;Angela P. Fuentes-Pardo;Luke A. Rogers;Melissa Orobko

  • Dispersal. J. Clobert, E. Danchin, A. A. Dhondt and J. D. Nichols (eds). Oxford University Press, New York. 2001. pp. 452. Price £24.95, paperback. ISBN: 0-19-850659-7.

    Lorenz Hauser

Frequent Co-Authors

Gary R. Carvalho
Gary R. Carvalho Bangor University
Thomas P. Quinn
Thomas P. Quinn University of Washington
Ray Hilborn
Ray Hilborn University of Washington
Benjamin Planque
Benjamin Planque French Research Institute for Exploitation of the Sea
Paul W. Shaw
Paul W. Shaw Aberystwyth University
Catriona Clemmesen
Catriona Clemmesen GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel
James E. Seeb
James E. Seeb University of Washington
Lisa W. Seeb
Lisa W. Seeb University of Washington
David S. Schoeman
David S. Schoeman University of the Sunshine Coast
Tony J. Pitcher
Tony J. Pitcher University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution opens doors to a wide variety of impactful careers. Many students complement their science backgrounds with expertise from related fields, either to broaden career options or to specialize in areas like policy, education, or counseling. Today, flexible online programs are making it easier than ever to pursue advanced education while balancing life commitments.

Those interested in mental health and environmental advocacy may consider online master degree programs in counseling. These programs equip graduates to support individuals and communities, often addressing issues such as ecological grief or community adaptation.

For roles in research, therapy, or public engagement, earning a clinical psychology degree online enables deeper understanding of human behavior and well-being. Those aiming for faster entry into community roles may opt for a online degree in human services—ideal for working in governmental, nonprofit, or educational settings that intersect with environmental work.

If you’re an educator with a passion for science, making a career change for teachers higher pay is a practical option. Transitioning into specialized roles restores passion for lifelong learning and often leads to more fulfilling and better-compensated career paths.

Best Scientists Citing Lorenz Hauser

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles