World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Kenneth R. McCurry

Kenneth R. McCurry

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 75 19214 18041 9570 8835 418 16961

Kenneth R. McCurry publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kenneth R. McCurry between 1984 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kenneth R. McCurry published across 43 years, from 1984 to 2026, averaging 10.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 36 publications in 2008. 13 of the 462 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 36. Peak 36 publications in 2008. 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 3 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 19 publications 2004: 21 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 29 publications 2007: 33 publications 2008: 36 publications 2009: 24 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 29 publications 2020: 23 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 12 publications 2026: 1 publication
1984 2026

462 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kenneth R. McCurry: publications per year, 1984 to 2026
Year Publications
1984 1
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 1
1992 2
1993 1
1994 3
1995 6
1996 3
1997 2
1998 4
1999 6
2000 5
2001 11
2002 7
2003 19
2004 21
2005 11
2006 29
2007 33
2008 36
2009 24
2010 12
2011 11
2012 10
2013 9
2014 10
2015 7
2016 15
2017 10
2018 16
2019 29
2020 23
2021 20
2022 20
2023 15
2024 17
2025 12
2026 1
Total 462
Download as CSV

Kenneth R. McCurry publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth R. McCurry sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 401–420 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 418 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918 418
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Kenneth R. McCurry D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth R. McCurry sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 74–75 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574 75
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Kenneth R. McCurry is affiliated with the Cleveland Clinic in the United States and has a substantial publication record primarily in the field of medicine. Their research contributions concentrate on surgery, biomedical engineering, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, and transplantation.

The recent published works include:

  • Coronary Artery Target Selection and Survival After Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Grafting, 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • The American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) 2022 Expert Consensus Document: The use of mechanical circulatory support in lung transplantation, 2022, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Modern practice and outcomes of reoperative cardiac surgery, 2021, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Remote ex vivo lung perfusion at a centralized evaluation facility, 2022, The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
  • Right Internal Thoracic Artery Patency Is Affected More by Target Choice Than Conduit Configuration, 2021, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery

The scientist frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
  • Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
  • The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Transplantation

Their work often covers these topics:

  • Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
  • Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
  • Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
  • Tracheal and airway disorders
  • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
  • Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
  • Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments

Frequent co-authors in their research collaborations include:

  • Toshihiro Okamoto
  • K.S. Ayyat
  • James Yun
  • Marie Budev
  • Ichiro Sakanoue

Their body of work reflects interdisciplinary integration between surgery, cardiovascular medicine, and transplantation techniques, focusing on clinical outcomes and device applications related to these areas.

Best Publications

  • Nitrate and nitrite in biology, nutrition and therapeutics

    Jon O Lundberg;Mark T Gladwin;Amrita Ahluwalia;Nigel Benjamin

  • Human complement regulatory proteins protect swine-to-primate cardiac xenografts from humoral injury.

    Kenneth R. McCurry;David L. Kooyman;Cristobal G. Alvarado;Adrian H. Cotterell

  • Transgenic pigs expressing human CD59 and decay-accelerating factor produce an intrinsic barrier to complement-mediated damage.

    Guerard W. Byrne;Kenneth R. Mccurry;Kenneth R. Mccurry;Michael J. Martin;S. M. Mcclellan

  • Hydrogen Inhalation Ameliorates Oxidative Stress in Transplantation Induced Intestinal Graft Injury

    B. M. Buchholz;D. J. Kaczorowski;R. Sugimoto;R. Yang

  • In vivo transfer of GPI-linked complement restriction factors from erythrocytes to the endothelium

    D. L. Kooyman;G. W. Byrne;S. McClellan;D. Nielsen

  • Influenza virus infection in adult solid organ transplant recipients.

    Regis A. Vilchez;Kenneth McCurry;James Dauber;Aldo Iacono

  • Carbon monoxide induces cytoprotection in rat orthotopic lung transplantation via anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic effects.

    Ruiping Song;Masatoshi Kubo;Danielle Morse;Zhihong Zhou

  • Opportunistic infections in 547 organ transplant recipients receiving alemtuzumab, a humanized monoclonal CD-52 antibody

    Anton Y. Peleg;Shahid Husain;Eun J. Kwak;Fernanda P. Silveira

  • A Randomized Trial of Inhaled Cyclosporine in Lung-Transplant Recipients

    Aldo T. Iacono;Bruce A. Johnson;Wayne F. Grgurich;J. Georges Youssef

  • Statin Use Is Associated with Improved Function and Survival of Lung Allografts

    Bruce A. Johnson;Aldo T. Iacono;Adriana Zeevi;Kenneth R. McCurry

  • Voriconazole Prophylaxis in Lung Transplant Recipients

    S. Husain;D. L. Paterson;S. Studer;J. Pilewski

  • Prospective assessment of Platelia Aspergillus galactomannan antigen for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis in lung transplant recipients.

    Shahid Husain;Eun Jeong Kwak;Asia Obman;Marilyn M. Wagener

  • Oral hydrogen water prevents chronic allograft nephropathy in rats

    Jon S. Cardinal;Jianghua Zhan;Yinna Wang;Ryujiro Sugimoto

  • Characterization of transgenic pigs expressing functionally active human CD59 on cardiac endothelium.

    Lisa E. Diamond;Kenneth R. McCurry;Michael J. Martin;Steven B. McClellan

  • Aspergillus galactomannan antigen in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis in lung transplant recipients.

    Shahid Husain;David L Paterson;Sean M Studer;Maria Crespo

  • Lung transplantation in scleroderma compared with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension.

    Lionel Schachna;Thomas A. Medsger;James H. Dauber;Fredrick M. Wigley

  • Normothermic ex-vivo preservation with the portable Organ Care System Lung device for bilateral lung transplantation (INSPIRE): a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority, phase 3 study

    Gregor Warnecke;Dirk Van Raemdonck;Michael A Smith;Gilbert Massard

  • HLA-Specific Antibodies are Risk Factors for Lymphocytic Bronchiolitis and Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction

    Alin L. Girnita;Rene Duquesnoy;Samuel A. Yousem;Aldo T. Iacono

  • Tacrolimus dosing in adult lung transplant patients is related to cytochrome P4503A5 gene polymorphism.

    HongXia Zheng;Adriana Zeevi;Erin Schuetz;Jatinder Lamba

  • Lung transplantation in the United States, 1998-2007.

    Kenneth R. McCurry;T. H. Shearon;L. B. Edwards;K. M. Chan

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert L. Kormos
Robert L. Kormos University of Pittsburgh
Joseph M. Pilewski
Joseph M. Pilewski University of Pittsburgh
Shahid Husain
Shahid Husain University Health Network
Timothy R. Billiar
Timothy R. Billiar University of Pittsburgh
Adriana Zeevi
Adriana Zeevi University of Pittsburgh
David L. Paterson
David L. Paterson University of Queensland
Eugene H. Blackstone
Eugene H. Blackstone Cleveland Clinic
Shaf Keshavjee
Shaf Keshavjee University Health Network
Robert J. Keenan
Robert J. Keenan University of Chicago
Mary Amanda Dew
Mary Amanda Dew University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those considering a career in medicine, a variety of flexible online degree options can help you advance quickly or enter the field from different points. Many nurses seeking to upgrade their credentials, for example, explore rn to bsn online no clinicals programs, which allow registered nurses to earn a Bachelor of Science in Nursing without required in-person clinicals.

For advanced practice, Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) degrees are increasingly popular. If speed is a priority, look at the fastest dnp program options available online. Cost is another key consideration, and some of the cheapest online dnp programs let you earn your degree affordably without sacrificing quality.

For quicker entry into the medical profession, becoming a Licensed Practical Nurse is an alternative to a full medical degree. Consider fast track medical lpn programs, which offer accelerated paths to employment in healthcare settings.

Whether you are just starting out or looking to advance, online degrees provide flexible pathways tailored to your goals.

Best Scientists Citing Kenneth R. McCurry

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles