World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 88 13346 12561 6788 6278 485 23050

Marcos Intaglietta publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marcos Intaglietta between 1963 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marcos Intaglietta published across 61 years, from 1963 to 2023, averaging 8.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 2006. 3 of the 500 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1963 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 2006. 1963: 1 publication 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 4 publications 1967: 1 publication 1968: 1 publication 1969: 1 publication 1970: 6 publications 1971: 14 publications 1972: 8 publications 1973: 12 publications 1974: 7 publications 1975: 6 publications 1976: 4 publications 1977: 7 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 8 publications 1980: 4 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 2 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 9 publications 1987: 10 publications 1988: 9 publications 1989: 20 publications 1990: 11 publications 1991: 8 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 12 publications 1994: 10 publications 1995: 11 publications 1996: 10 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 11 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 22 publications 2005: 27 publications 2006: 31 publications 2007: 24 publications 2008: 22 publications 2009: 18 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 1 publication 2022: 1 publication 2023: 2 publications
1963 2023

500 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marcos Intaglietta: publications per year, 1963 to 2023
Year Publications
1963 1
1964 0
1965 0
1966 4
1967 1
1968 1
1969 1
1970 6
1971 14
1972 8
1973 12
1974 7
1975 6
1976 4
1977 7
1978 1
1979 8
1980 4
1981 1
1982 2
1983 4
1984 5
1985 4
1986 9
1987 10
1988 9
1989 20
1990 11
1991 8
1992 8
1993 12
1994 10
1995 11
1996 10
1997 9
1998 11
1999 9
2000 6
2001 6
2002 7
2003 11
2004 22
2005 27
2006 31
2007 24
2008 22
2009 18
2010 14
2011 11
2012 10
2013 9
2014 6
2015 5
2016 3
2017 7
2018 5
2019 3
2020 1
2021 1
2022 1
2023 2
Total 500
Download as CSV

Marcos Intaglietta publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcos Intaglietta sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 481–500 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 485 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713 485
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Marcos Intaglietta D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcos Intaglietta sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88–89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970 88
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1994 - Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE)

Overview

Marcos Intaglietta is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their primary field of study is Medicine, with a focus on several subfields including Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Biomedical Engineering, Surgery, and Cell Biology.

Intaglietta's recent scholarly work covers a range of topics in medical and biomedical research. Key areas of research include Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control, Hemoglobin structure and function, Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances, Respiratory Support and Mechanisms, Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices, Membrane Separation Technologies, and Blood properties and coagulation.

Notable recent papers authored by or involving Intaglietta include:

  • A model of anemic tissue perfusion after blood transfusion shows critical role of endothelial response to shear stress stimuli, 2021, Journal of Applied Physiology
  • Hypertonic treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome, 2023, Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
  • Implications of Systemic Hematocrit on the Radial Distribution of Red Cells in Arterioles, 2020, The FASEB Journal
  • Prony Analysis of Left Ventricle Pressure and Volume, 2023, Medical Engineering & Physics

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Intaglietta include Weiyu Li, Amy G. Tsai, Daniel M. Tartakovsky, Vivek Jani, and Pedro Cabrales.

Intaglietta's research outputs have appeared across a variety of publication venues, notably:

  • Journal of Applied Physiology
  • Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
  • The FASEB Journal
  • Medical Engineering & Physics

Among professional recognitions, Intaglietta was awarded the title of Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE) in 1994.

Best Publications

  • Oxygen Gradients in the Microcirculation

    Amy G. Tsai;Paul C. Johnson;Marcos Intaglietta

  • NO-mediated activation of heme oxygenase: endogenous cytoprotection against oxidative stress to endothelium

    R. Motterlini;R. Foresti;M. Intaglietta;R. M. Winslow

  • Microvascular and tissue oxygen distribution

    Marcos Intaglietta;Paul C. Johnson;Robert M. Winslow

  • Microvascular measurements by video image shearing and splitting

    M. Intaglietta;W.R. Tompkins

  • A transparent access chamber for the rat dorsal skin fold.

    Heinz D. Papenfuss;Joseph F. Gross;Marcos Intaglietta;Fred A. Treese

  • Quantitation of rhythmic diameter changes in arterial microcirculation

    A. Colantuoni;S. Bertuglia;M. Intaglietta

  • Effect of erythrocyte aggregation on velocity profiles in venules

    Jeffrey J. Bishop;Patricia R. Nance;Aleksander S. Popel;Marcos Intaglietta

  • Dynamic fluid redistribution in hyperosmotic resuscitation of hypovolemic hemorrhage.

    M. C. Mazzoni;P. Borgstrom;K. E. Arfors;M. Intaglietta

  • Microvascular and tissue oxygen gradients in the rat mesentery

    Amy G. Tsai;Barbara Friesenecker;Michelle C. Mazzoni;Heinz Kerger

  • Low nitric oxide bioavailability contributes to the genesis of experimental cerebral malaria.

    Irene Gramaglia;Peter Sobolewski;Diana Meays;Ramiro Contreras

  • Molecular dimensions of Hb-based O2 carriers determine constriction of resistance arteries and hypertension

    Hiromi Sakai;Hiroyuki Hara;Minako Yuasa;Amy G. Tsai

  • Noninvasive measurement of microvascular and interstitial oxygen profiles in a human tumor in SCID mice.

    I P Torres Filho;M Leunig;F Yuan;M Intaglietta

  • Elevated plasma viscosity in extreme hemodilution increases perivascular nitric oxide concentration and microvascular perfusion.

    Amy G Tsai;Cesar Acero;Patricia R Nance;Pedro Cabrales

  • Present state of intentional hemodilution.

    K. Messmer;U. Kreimeier;M. Intaglietta

  • Capillary narrowing in hemorrhagic shock is rectified by hyperosmotic saline-dextran reinfusion.

    M C Mazzoni;P Borgström;M Intaglietta;K E Arfors

  • A microscope-television system for studying flow velocity in human skin capillaries

    B Fagrell;A Fronek;M Intaglietta

  • Plasma viscosity regulates capillary perfusion during extreme hemodilution in hamster skinfold model

    Amy G. Tsai;Barbara Friesenecker;Michael McCarthy;Hiromi Sakai

  • Tissue Perfusion Inhomogeneity During Early Tumor Growth in Rats

    Bernhard Endrich;Huibert S. Reinhold;Joseph F. Gross;Marcos Intaglietta

  • Microvascular perfusion upon exchange transfusion with stored red blood cells in normovolemic anemic conditions.

    Amy G. Tsai;Pedro Cabrales;Marcos Intaglietta

  • Targeted O2 delivery by low-P50 hemoglobin: a new basis for O2 therapeutics.

    Amy G. Tsai;Kim D. Vandegriff;Marcos Intaglietta;Robert M. Winslow

Frequent Co-Authors

Aleksander S. Popel
Aleksander S. Popel Johns Hopkins University
John A. Frangos
John A. Frangos University of California, San Diego
Eishun Tsuchida
Eishun Tsuchida Waseda University
Luigi Fortuna
Luigi Fortuna University of Catania
Shinji Takeoka
Shinji Takeoka Waseda University
Paolo Arena
Paolo Arena University of Catania
Shankar Subramaniam
Shankar Subramaniam University of California, San Diego
Timothy W. Secomb
Timothy W. Secomb University of Arizona
Roberto Motterlini
Roberto Motterlini Paris-Est Créteil University
Rakesh K. Jain
Rakesh K. Jain Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in medicine doesn’t mean you’re limited to becoming a doctor. There are many in-demand healthcare roles you can pursue online. For those interested in technology and organizing medical data, health information technology programs online offer affordable pathways into a growing field.

If you prefer administrative and data-driven roles, you might explore billing and coding classes online. These programs can help you qualify for vital positions in medical offices and hospitals, often in as little as a year.

Nursing continues to be a rewarding and highly employable profession. There are flexible options for earning your degree, such as cheapest np school online for those looking to advance as a nurse practitioner, or nursing school online if you’re starting your nursing journey.

These online healthcare degrees are ideal if you want to balance study with work or family commitments, providing flexible and affordable career pathways within the broader medical field.

Best Scientists Citing Marcos Intaglietta

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles