World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
105
Citations
40597
World Ranking
6774
National Ranking
257

Can Ince publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Can Ince sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 629 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Can Ince D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Can Ince sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 105 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Can Ince is affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam in the Netherlands and has focused their research primarily within the field of Medicine. Their work extensively covers subfields such as Epidemiology, Surgery, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

Their research topics span a range of clinically significant areas including:

  • Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation
  • Thermal Regulation in Medicine
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes

Some of Can Ince's recent publications include:

  • Endothelial Responses in Sepsis, 2020, published in American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
  • Intravenous fluid therapy in the perioperative and critical care setting: Executive summary of the International Fluid Academy (IFA), 2020, published in Annals of Intensive Care
  • Current practice and evolving concepts in septic shock resuscitation, 2021, published in Intensive Care Medicine
  • The future of intensive care: the study of the microcirculation will help to guide our therapies, 2023, published in Critical Care
  • Microcirculatory dysfunction in cardiogenic shock, 2023, published in Annals of Intensive Care

Frequent co-authors with whom Can Ince has collaborated multiple times include:

  • Matthias P. Hilty
  • Bülent Ergin
  • Zühre Uz
  • Şakir Akın
  • Göksel Güven

The scientist often publishes in journals such as:

  • Critical Care
  • Blood Purification
  • Annals of Intensive Care
  • Intensive Care Medicine
  • Journal of Intensive Medicine

Best Publications

  • Deletion of the hypoxia-response element in the vascular endothelial growth factor promoter causes motor neuron degeneration

    B. Oosthuyse;L. Moons;E. Storkebaum;H. Beck

  • Orthogonal polarization spectral imaging: a new method for study of the microcirculation.

    Warren Groner;James W. Winkelman;Anthony G. Harris;Can Ince

  • The microcirculation is the motor of sepsis

    Can Ince

  • How to evaluate the microcirculation: report of a round table conference

    Daniel De Backer;Steven Hollenberg;Christiaan Boerma;Peter Goedhart

  • A Unified Theory of Sepsis-Induced Acute Kidney Injury: Inflammation, microcirculatory dysfunction, bioenergetics and the tubular cell adaptation to injury

    Hernando Gomez;Can Ince;Daniel De Backer;Peter Pickkers

  • Nitroglycerin in septic shock after intravascular volume resuscitation.

    Peter E Spronk;Can Ince;Martin J Gardien;Keshen R Mathura

  • Microcirculatory oxygenation and shunting in sepsis and shock.

    Can Ince;Michiel Sinaasappel

  • THE ENDOTHELIUM IN SEPSIS.

    Can Ince;Philip P.R. Mayeux;Trung Nguyen;Hernando Gomez

  • Endothelial glycocalyx damage coincides with microalbuminuria in type 1 diabetes

    Max Nieuwdorp;Hans L. Mooij;Jojanneke Kroon;Bektas Atasever

  • Hemodynamic coherence and the rationale for monitoring the microcirculation

    Can Ince

  • Increasing arterial blood pressure with norepinephrine does not improve microcirculatory blood flow: a prospective study

    Arnaldo Dubin;Mario Omar Pozo;Christian A. Casabella;Fernando Pálizas Jr.

  • Second consensus on the assessment of sublingual microcirculation in critically ill patients: results from a task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine

    Can Ince;E Christiaan Boerma;Maurizio Cecconi;Daniel De Backer

  • Erratum to: 36th International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine: Brussels, Belgium. 15-18 March 2016

    R. M. Bateman;M. D. Sharpe;J. E. Jagger;C. G. Ellis

  • Potential use of biomarkers in acute kidney injury: report and summary of recommendations from the 10th Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative consensus conference

    Patrick T. Murray;Ravindra L. Mehta;Andrew D. Shaw;Claudio Ronco

  • Endothelial Responses in Sepsis

    Jérémie Joffre;Jérémie Joffre;Judith Hellman;Can Ince;Hafid Ait-Oufella

  • Quantifying bedside-derived imaging of microcirculatory abnormalities in septic patients: a prospective validation study

    E. Christiaan Boerma;Keshen R. Mathura;Peter H. J. van der Voort;Peter E. Spronk

  • Bench-to-bedside review: Sepsis is a disease of the microcirculation

    Peter E Spronk;Durk F Zandstra;Can Ince

  • Renal Hypoxia and Dysoxia After Reperfusion of the Ischemic Kidney

    Matthieu Legrand;Matthieu Legrand;Egbert G Mik;Tanja Johannes;Didier Payen

  • The Laser-assisted Optical Rotational Cell Analyzer (LORCA) as red blood cell aggregometer

    M.R. Hardeman;J.G.G. Dobbe;C. Ince

  • Perioperative Quality Initiative consensus statement on preoperative blood pressure, risk and outcomes for elective surgery

    Robert D. Sanders;Fintan Hughes;Andrew Shaw;Annemarie Thompson

Frequent Co-Authors

Jan Bakker
Jan Bakker New York University
Didier Payen
Didier Payen Université Paris Cité
Dick Tibboel
Dick Tibboel Erasmus University Rotterdam
Luciano Gattinoni
Luciano Gattinoni University of Göttingen
John A. Kellum
John A. Kellum University of Pittsburgh
Peter Pickkers
Peter Pickkers Radboud University
Thomas M. van Gulik
Thomas M. van Gulik University of Amsterdam
Michael R. Pinsky
Michael R. Pinsky University of Pittsburgh
Mervyn Singer
Mervyn Singer University College London
Daniel De Backer
Daniel De Backer Université Libre de Bruxelles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens up numerous options beyond traditional medical school. Many students consider online degrees and accelerated programs to fast-track their careers. For nurses aiming for the highest level of practice, you may find the shortest online dnp program options provide flexibility and a quicker route to leadership roles in healthcare.

Cost is a significant concern for many students. Programs like the cheapest dnp programs directly address this issue by offering affordable tuition without sacrificing quality. Accelerated paths also exist at the entry level; students who want to become nurses quickly can benefit from an lpn accelerated program that prepares them to start working faster.

For those interested in mental health care, specialized options are available. Programs like psych np online programs allow registered nurses to focus on psychiatric services, a field in increasing demand. Online and accelerated pathways are making medical careers more accessible than ever before.

Best Scientists Citing Can Ince

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles