World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 91 11583 10892 359 342 512 39213

Didier Payen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Didier Payen between 1982 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Didier Payen published across 44 years, from 1982 to 2025, averaging 12.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2015. 7 of the 564 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2015. 1982: 4 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 8 publications 1985: 14 publications 1986: 6 publications 1987: 9 publications 1988: 12 publications 1989: 20 publications 1990: 14 publications 1991: 11 publications 1992: 9 publications 1993: 10 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 13 publications 1996: 15 publications 1997: 28 publications 1998: 20 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 16 publications 2004: 15 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 28 publications 2009: 24 publications 2010: 19 publications 2011: 25 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 27 publications 2014: 18 publications 2015: 30 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 5 publications
1982 2025

564 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Didier Payen: publications per year, 1982 to 2025
Year Publications
1982 4
1983 2
1984 8
1985 14
1986 6
1987 9
1988 12
1989 20
1990 14
1991 11
1992 9
1993 10
1994 3
1995 13
1996 15
1997 28
1998 20
1999 9
2000 9
2001 3
2002 3
2003 16
2004 15
2005 13
2006 11
2007 12
2008 28
2009 24
2010 19
2011 25
2012 13
2013 27
2014 18
2015 30
2016 14
2017 8
2018 6
2019 17
2020 16
2021 13
2022 5
2023 5
2024 2
2025 5
Total 564
Download as CSV

Didier Payen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Didier Payen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 501–520 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 512 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617 512
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Didier Payen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Didier Payen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 90–91 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922 91
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Didier Payen is affiliated with Université Paris Cité in France and specializes in the field of medicine, focusing extensively on critical care and infectious diseases. Their research has produced numerous publications across various subfields, including epidemiology, immunology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, and intensive care medicine.

The scientist has contributed notably to topics such as sepsis diagnosis and treatment, respiratory support and mechanisms, COVID-19 clinical research studies, immune response and inflammation, cardiac arrest and resuscitation, long-term effects of COVID-19, and thermal regulation in medicine.

Frequent publication venues for Didier Payen include:

  • Frontiers in Immunology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Annals of Intensive Care
  • Intensive Care Medicine
  • Critical Care

Some of the recent papers published by Didier Payen are:

  • "A Longitudinal Study of Immune Cells in Severe COVID-19 Patients," 2020, Frontiers in Immunology
  • "Current use of inotropes in circulatory shock," 2021, Annals of Intensive Care
  • "Enhancing sepsis biomarker development: key considerations from public and private perspectives," 2024, Critical Care
  • "CXCL5-mediated recruitment of neutrophils into the peritoneal cavity of Gdf15-deficient mice protects against abdominal sepsis," 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Rescue therapy with inhaled nitric oxide and almitrine in COVID-19 patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome," 2020, Annals of Intensive Care

Didier Payen collaborates frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Anne-Claire Lukaszewicz
  • Claire Dupuis
  • Valérie Faivre
  • Marie-Reine Losser
  • Martin Sebastian Winkler

The research undertaken by Didier Payen touches on both the clinical and biological aspects of critical illness, integrating studies on immune responses with patient-centered approaches to critical care conditions such as sepsis and severe COVID-19. Their work spans observational studies as well as interventional research focused on improving understanding and treatment protocols.

Best Publications

  • Sepsis in European intensive care units: results of the SOAP study.

    Jean-Louis Vincent;Yasser Sakr;Charles L. Sprung;V Marco Ranieri

  • Sepsis-induced immunosuppression: from cellular dysfunctions to immunotherapy

    Richard S. Hotchkiss;Guillaume Monneret;Didier Payen

  • Hydrocortisone Therapy for Patients with Septic Shock

    Charles L. Sprung;Djillali Annane;Didier Keh;Rui Moreno

  • Immunosuppression in sepsis: a novel understanding of the disorder and a new therapeutic approach

    Richard S Hotchkiss;Guillaume Monneret;Didier Payen

  • Drotrecogin alfa (activated) in adults with septic shock

    V. Marco Ranieri;B. Taylor Thompson;Philip S. Barie;Jean-François Dhainaut

  • A positive fluid balance is associated with a worse outcome in patients with acute renal failure

    Didier Payen;Anne-Cornélie Jm de Pont;Yasser Sakr;Claudia D. Spies

  • Sequential-Design, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Early Decompressive Craniectomy in Malignant Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction (DECIMAL Trial)

    Katayoun Vahedi;Eric Vicaut;Joaquim Mateo;Annie Kurtz

  • A Unified Theory of Sepsis-Induced Acute Kidney Injury: Inflammation, microcirculatory dysfunction, bioenergetics and the tubular cell adaptation to injury

    Hernando Gomez;Can Ince;Daniel De Backer;Peter Pickkers

  • Cytokine Cascade in Sepsis

    Jean-Marc Cavaillon;Minou Adib-Conquy;Catherine Fitting;Christophe Adrie

  • Functional hemodynamic monitoring

    Michael R Pinsky;Didier Payen

  • Does dopamine administration in shock influence outcome? Results of the Sepsis Occurrence in Acutely Ill Patients (SOAP) Study

    Yasser Sakr;Konrad Reinhart;Jean-Louis Vincent;Charles L. Sprung

  • Second consensus on the assessment of sublingual microcirculation in critically ill patients: results from a task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine

    Can Ince;E Christiaan Boerma;Maurizio Cecconi;Daniel De Backer

  • Life-threatening primary postpartum hemorrhage : Treatment with emergency selective arterial embolization

    J P Pelage;O Le Dref;J Mateo;P Soyer

  • Association between systemic hemodynamics and septic acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: a retrospective observational study.

    Matthieu Legrand;Claire Dupuis;Christelle Simon;Etienne Gayat;Etienne Gayat

  • Impact of continuous venovenous hemofiltration on organ failure during the early phase of severe sepsis: a randomized controlled trial.

    Didier Payen;Joaquim Mateo;Jean Marc Cavaillon;François Fraisse

  • Early use of polymyxin B hemoperfusion in patients with septic shock due to peritonitis: a multicenter randomized control trial

    Didier M. Payen;Joelle Guilhot;Yoann Launey;Anne Claire Lukaszewicz

  • Renal Hypoxia and Dysoxia After Reperfusion of the Ischemic Kidney

    Matthieu Legrand;Matthieu Legrand;Egbert G Mik;Tanja Johannes;Didier Payen

  • Noninvasive monitoring of cardiac output in critically ill patients using transesophageal Doppler.

    Bruno Valtier;Bernard P. Cholley;Jean-Pierre Belot;Jean-Emmanuel de la Coussaye

  • Functional hemodynamic monitoring.

    Mehrnaz Hadian;Michael R Pinsky

  • Functional Hemodynamic Monitoring: Foundations and Future

    Michael R Pinsky;Didier Payen

Frequent Co-Authors

Jean Louis Vincent
Jean Louis Vincent Université Libre de Bruxelles
Eric Vicaut
Eric Vicaut Université Paris Cité
Charles L. Sprung
Charles L. Sprung Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Konrad Reinhart
Konrad Reinhart Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Can Ince
Can Ince Erasmus University Rotterdam
Jan Bakker
Jan Bakker New York University
Michael R. Pinsky
Michael R. Pinsky University of Pittsburgh
Mervyn Singer
Mervyn Singer University College London
Catherine Fitting
Catherine Fitting Institut Pasteur

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Medicine doesn’t always mean attending traditional in-person programs. Today, a range of online degrees and flexible pathways make it easier to start or advance in healthcare. Nursing remains a popular route, especially for those seeking alternative entry requirements. Many programs answer the question: do i need to take the teas test for lpn by offering options with no TEAS or HESI exam needed.

If you’re interested in healthcare leadership, healthcare administration degrees are available online and serve as a strong foundation for roles in hospital and clinic management. Registered Nurses (RNs) can also progress their careers via bridge programs, like asn to np programs, which help nurses move into advanced practice roles such as Nurse Practitioner in less time.

For those passionate about preventative health, earning a nutrition degree online can lead to opportunities in clinical nutrition, research, and public health. With these flexible educational options, you can customize your path to a rewarding healthcare career from anywhere.

Best Scientists Citing Didier Payen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles