World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 38 8934 8345 4737 4311 125 5152

Jane E. Roberts publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jane E. Roberts between 1994 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jane E. Roberts published across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025, averaging 4.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2025. 19 of the 153 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2025. 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 6 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 13 publications
1994 2025

153 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jane E. Roberts: publications per year, 1994 to 2025
Year Publications
1994 1
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 2
1999 0
2000 3
2001 3
2002 0
2003 1
2004 1
2005 6
2006 2
2007 4
2008 4
2009 4
2010 2
2011 2
2012 7
2013 6
2014 2
2015 6
2016 9
2017 11
2018 11
2019 10
2020 10
2021 9
2022 9
2023 9
2024 6
2025 13
Total 153
Download as CSV

Jane E. Roberts publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane E. Roberts sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 125 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 125
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jane E. Roberts D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane E. Roberts sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 38
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jane E. Roberts is affiliated with the University of South Carolina in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas in neuroscience and genetics, with a strong focus on neurodevelopmental disorders, especially autism spectrum disorder and fragile X syndrome.

Their recent scholarly articles include:

  • Face-sensitive brain responses in the first year of life, 2020, published in NeuroImage
  • Emergence and rate of autism in fragile X syndrome across the first years of life, 2020, published in Development and Psychopathology
  • Fragile X syndrome: an overview of cause, characteristics, assessment and management, 2020, published in Paediatrics and Child Health
  • Emergence of Developmental Delay in Infants and Toddlers With an FMR1 Mutation, 2021, published in PEDIATRICS
  • A Need for Consistency in Behavioral Phenotyping for ASD: Analysis of the Valproic Acid Model, 2021, published in Autism Research and Treatment

The researcher has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including Abigail L. Hogan, Elizabeth Will, Jessica Klusek, Kimberly J. Hills, and Kayla Smith.

Publications by Jane E. Roberts often appear in key venues such as UNC Libraries, American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, Frontiers in Psychiatry, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, and PEDIATRICS.

The main fields of study for this scholar are Neuroscience and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. They focus on subfields like Cognitive Neuroscience, Genetics, Education, Clinical Psychology, and Psychiatry and Mental Health.

The research topics they cover prominently include:

  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Family and Disability Support Research
  • Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Language Development and Disorders
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Best Publications

  • Autistic behavior in children with fragile X syndrome: prevalence, stability, and the impact of FMRP.

    Deborah D. Hatton;John Sideris;Martie Skinner;Jean Mankowski

  • Autistic Behavior in Young Boys with Fragile X Syndrome.

    Donald B. Bailey;Gary B. Mesibov;Deborah D. Hatton;Renee D. Clark

  • Maternal depression and developmental disability: Research critique

    Donald B. Bailey;Robert N. Golden;Jane Roberts;Amy Ford

  • Mood and anxiety disorders in females with the FMR1 premutation

    Jane E. Roberts;Donald B. Bailey;Jean Mankowski;Amy Ford

  • Language comprehension in boys with fragile X syndrome and boys with Down syndrome

    J Price;J Roberts;N Vandergrift;G Martin

  • Developmental trajectories and correlates of sensory processing in young boys with fragile X syndrome.

    Grace T. Baranek;Jane E. Roberts;Fabian J. David;John Sideris

  • Social Approach and Autistic Behavior in Children with Fragile X Syndrome

    Jane E. Roberts;Leigh Anne H. Weisenfeld;Deborah D. Hatton;Morgan Heath

  • Cardiac autonomic regulation in autism and Fragile X syndrome: a review.

    Jessica Klusek;Jane E. Roberts;Molly Losh

  • Face-sensitive brain responses in the first year of life.

    Stefania Conte;John E. Richards;Maggie W. Guy;Wanze Xie

  • Family experiences and factors associated with the diagnosis of fragile X syndrome.

    Donald B. Bailey;Debra Skinner;Deborah Hatton;Jane Roberts

  • Behavioral Indexes of the Efficacy of Sensory Integration Therapy

    Jane E Roberts;Linda King-Thomas;Marcia L Boccia

  • Cardiovascular indices of physiological arousal in boys with fragile X syndrome.

    Jane E. Roberts;Maria L. Boccia;Donald B. Bailey;Deborah D. Hatton

  • Trajectories and Predictors of the Development of Very Young Boys with Fragile X Syndrome

    Jane E. Roberts;Jean Boswell Mankowski;John Sideris;Barbara Davis Goldman

  • Child and genetic variables associated with maternal adaptation to fragile X syndrome: a multidimensional analysis.

    Donald B. Bailey;John Sideris;Jane Roberts;Deborah Hatton

  • Adaptive behavior in children with fragile X syndrome.

    Deborah D. Hatton;Anne C. Wheeler;Martie L. Skinner;Donald B. Bailey

  • Mapping nonverbal IQ in young boys with fragile X syndrome.

    Martie Skinner;Stephen Hooper;Deborah D. Hatton;Jane Roberts

  • Video Analysis of Sensory-Motor Features in Infants with Fragile X Syndrome at 9–12 Months of Age

    Grace T. Baranek;Cassandra D. Danko;Martie L. Skinner;Donald B. Bailey

  • Behavioral and Physiological Responses to Child-Directed Speech of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders or Typical Development

    Linda R. Watson;Jane E. Roberts;Jane E. Roberts;Grace T. Baranek;Kerry C. Mandulak;Kerry C. Mandulak

  • Behavioral and Physiological Responses to Child-Directed Speech as Predictors of Communication Outcomes in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders

    Linda R. Watson;Grace T. Baranek;Jane E. Roberts;Fabian J. David

  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Symptoms in Infants with Fragile X Syndrome: A Prospective Case Series.

    Abigail L. Hogan;Kelly E. Caravella;Jordan Ezell;Lisa Rague

  • Neural correlates of face processing in etiologically-distinct 12-month-old infants at high-risk of autism spectrum disorder

    Margaret W Guy;John E. Richards;Bridgette L Tonnsen;Jane E Roberts

Frequent Co-Authors

Deborah D. Hatton
Deborah D. Hatton Vanderbilt University
Donald B. Bailey
Donald B. Bailey Research Triangle Park Foundation
Leonard J Abbeduto
Leonard J Abbeduto University of California, Davis
Grace T. Baranek
Grace T. Baranek University of Southern California
John Sideris
John Sideris University of Southern California
Martie Skinner
Martie Skinner University of Washington
Stephen R. Hooper
Stephen R. Hooper University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
John E. Richards
John E. Richards University of South Carolina
Linda R. Watson
Linda R. Watson University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Kim Cornish
Kim Cornish Monash University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are considering a psychology degree in the USA, a wide range of online programs can lead to exciting and diverse career paths. Many psychology specializations require advanced degrees and specialized training, so it's important to know what to expect and plan your educational journey strategically.

For instance, if you are interested in working with children and youth, you may want to learn how many years to become a child psychologist. Clinical roles are another popular choice, and it is essential to understand how long does it take to become a clinical psychologist before starting this path.

For those fascinated by the connection between psychology and the law, you must know what degree is needed to become a forensic psychologist. Additionally, if the relationship between brain function and behavior inspires you, explore the requirements to become a neuropsychologist.

By researching these different pathways, you can choose the online degree that aligns best with your professional and personal aspirations, paving the way for a rewarding career in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Jane E. Roberts

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles