World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
58
Citations
9436
World Ranking
3923
National Ranking
2195

Neuroscience

D-Index
58
Citations
9565
World Ranking
4238
National Ranking
1911

John E. Richards publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John E. Richards sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 124 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

John E. Richards D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John E. Richards sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

John E. Richards is affiliated with the University of South Carolina in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine, with a particular focus on subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Biomedical Engineering, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, and Developmental and Educational Psychology.

The scientist's work addresses a range of topics including Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques, Face Recognition and Perception, Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications, Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications, and Neural Dynamics and Brain Function.

John E. Richards has published extensively, contributing to noteworthy venues. Frequent publication outlets include Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental Science, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), NeuroImage, and PLoS ONE.

Recent papers illustrate the scope and focus of their research:

  • Face-sensitive brain responses in the first year of life (2020, NeuroImage)
  • The developmental trajectory of fronto-temporoparietal connectivity as a proxy of the default mode network: a longitudinal fNIRS investigation (2020, Human Brain Mapping)
  • Structural templates for imaging EEG cortical sources in infants (2020, NeuroImage)
  • The influence of maternal anxiety and depression symptoms on fNIRS brain responses to emotional faces in 5- and 7-month-old infants (2020, Infant Behavior and Development)
  • Association of psychosocial adversity and social information processing in children raised in a low-resource setting: an fNIRS study (2022, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience)

Collaboration is a significant aspect of their work, with frequent co-authors including Stefania Conte, Charles A. Nelson, Maggie W. Guy, Xiaoxue Fu, and Jane E. Roberts.

In addition to journal publications, John E. Richards has contributed to book literature, such as the volume published by Cambridge University Press titled The Cambridge Handbook of Infant Development (2020).

Best Publications

  • The emergence of the social brain network: Evidence from typical and atypical development

    Mark H Johnson;Richard Griffin;Gergely Csibra;Hanife Halit

  • Familiarization, attention, and recognition memory in infancy: an event-related potential and cortical source localization study.

    Greg D. Reynolds;John E. Richards

  • Heart rate variability during attention phases in young infants.

    John E. Richards;Betty Jo Casey

  • Attention affects the recognition of briefly presented visual stimuli in infants: an ERP study.

    John E. Richards

  • Infants' Attention to Patterned Stimuli: Developmental Change from 3 to 12 Months of Age

    Mary L. Courage;Greg D. Reynolds;John E. Richards

  • Infant visual sustained attention and respiratory sinus arrhythmia.

    John E. Richards

  • A database of age-appropriate average MRI templates.

    John E. Richards;Carmen Sanchez;Michelle Phillips-Meek;Wanze Xie

  • Top-down modulation in the infant brain: Learning-induced expectations rapidly affect the sensory cortex at 6 months.

    Lauren L. Emberson;Lauren L. Emberson;John E. Richards;Richard N. Aslin;Richard N. Aslin

  • Cognitive neuroscience of attention : a developmental perspective

    John Edward Richards

  • Effects of attention on infants' preference for briefly exposed visual stimuli in the paired-comparison recognition-memory paradigm.

    John E. Richards

  • Age-specific MRI templates for pediatric neuroimaging

    Carmen E. Sanchez;John E. Richards;C. Robert Almli

  • Strategic Management: Issues and Cases

    Paul Dobson;Ken Starkey;John Richards

  • The Neural and Cognitive Time Course of Theory of Mind

    Joseph P. McCleery;Andrew D. R. Surtees;Katharine A. Graham;John E. Richards

  • The development of attention to simple and complex visual stimuli in infants: Behavioral and psychophysiological measures.

    John E. Richards

  • Neurodevelopmental MRI brain templates for children from 2 weeks to 4 years of age

    Carmen E. Sanchez;John E. Richards;C. Robert Almli

  • Localizing the development of covert attention in infants with scalp event-related potentials.

    John E. Richards

  • Heart Rate and Behavioral measures of Attention in Six‐, Nine‐, and Twelve‐Month‐Old Infants during Object Exploration

    Jeffrey M. Lansink;John E. Richards

  • Extended Visual Fixation in the Early Preschool Years: Look Duration, Heart Rate Changes, and Attentional Inertia

    John E. Richards;Kim Cronise

  • Attention in young infants: A developmental psychophysiological perspective.

    John E. Richards

  • The neural sources of N170: Understanding timing of activation in face-selective areas.

    Chuanji Gao;Stefania Conte;John E. Richards;Wanze Xie

  • Infant heart-rate variability and behavioral developmental status☆

    John E. Richards;Dana Cameron

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles A. Nelson
Charles A. Nelson Boston Children's Hospital
B. J. Casey
B. J. Casey Barnard College
Mary L. Courage
Mary L. Courage St. John's University
Richard N. Aslin
Richard N. Aslin Yale University
Jane E. Roberts
Jane E. Roberts University of South Carolina
Victoria Southgate
Victoria Southgate University of Copenhagen
Daniel R. Anderson
Daniel R. Anderson University of Massachusetts Amherst
John M. Henderson
John M. Henderson University of California, Davis
Antonia F. de C. Hamilton
Antonia F. de C. Hamilton University College London
Mayada Elsabbagh
Mayada Elsabbagh McGill University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens the door to a wide range of online degrees and rewarding career paths. Many students pursue a bachelor’s, master’s, or doctoral degree online, offering flexible schedules and access to top academic resources from anywhere. One key consideration is choosing a program that provides strong practical experience and support, as these factors can make a big difference in career outcomes.

When exploring options, it’s helpful to look at regional program rankings. For instance, the top psychology degrees in Georgia offer varied online and hybrid options designed for working adults. Similarly, students can review the best psychology degree rankings in Grand Forks to identify reputable schools in North Dakota. Michigan also boasts strong programs, highlighted in the best psychology program rankings in Grand Rapids.

Beyond academics, graduates can enter diverse fields such as counseling, human resources, social work, or clinical research. Aspiring students in South Carolina can discover flexible options and unique career-focused programs through the best psychology program rankings in Greenville. Careful research and regional comparison will help you choose the best pathway for your personal and professional growth.

Best Scientists Citing John E. Richards

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles