World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 34 10227 9571 1005 959 111 4784

Joanna Moss publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Joanna Moss between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Joanna Moss published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 6.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2023. 10 of the 133 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2023. 2005: 3 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 5 publications
2005 2025

133 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Joanna Moss: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 3
2006 3
2007 2
2008 8
2009 7
2010 8
2011 11
2012 3
2013 4
2014 7
2015 9
2016 4
2017 11
2018 11
2019 7
2020 5
2021 5
2022 3
2023 12
2024 5
2025 5
Total 133
Download as CSV

Joanna Moss publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joanna Moss sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 111 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 111
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Joanna Moss D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joanna Moss sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 34
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Joanna Moss is affiliated with the University of Surrey in the United Kingdom. Their research has a strong focus on autism spectrum disorder and genetic influences on neurodevelopmental conditions, including intellectual disability and behavioral studies.

The primary fields of study include Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with 27 publications, and Neuroscience, with 19 publications. Within these, Joanna's work covers multiple subfields such as Genetics, Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, Molecular Biology, and Pathology and Forensic Medicine.

Main research topics addressed by Joanna Moss include:

  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Family and Disability Support Research
  • Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Tumors and Oncological Cases
  • Behavioral and Psychological Studies

Joanna Moss has published in several scientific journals, with frequent contributions to:

  • Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
  • Molecular Autism
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
  • Paediatrics and Child Health

Frequent co-authors include Chris Oliver, Caroline Richards, Hayley Crawford, Jane Waite, and Katherine Ellis.

Recent publications of note include:

  • Persistence and predictors of self-injurious behaviour in autism: a ten-year prospective cohort study, 2020, Molecular Autism
  • Profiles of autism characteristics in thirteen genetic syndromes: a machine learning approach, 2023, Molecular Autism
  • The behaviour and wellbeing of children and adults with severe intellectual disability and complex needs: the Be-Well checklist for carers and professionals, 2020, Paediatrics and Child Health
  • Autism spectrum disorder in females with fragile X syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence, 2021, Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • An Observational Study of Social Interaction Skills and Behaviors in Cornelia de Lange, Fragile X and Rubinstein-Taybi Syndromes, 2020, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Best Publications

  • Prevalence of autism spectrum disorder phenomenology in genetic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Caroline Richards;Christopher Jones;Laura Groves;Joanna Moss;Joanna Moss

  • Diagnosis and management of Cornelia de Lange syndrome: first international consensus statement

    Antonie D. Kline;Joanna F. Moss;Angelo Selicorni;Anne Marie Bisgaard

  • Autism spectrum disorders in genetic syndromes: implications for diagnosis, intervention and understanding the wider autism spectrum disorder population.

    J. Moss;Patricia Howlin

  • The prevalence and phenomenology of self‐injurious and aggressive behaviour in genetic syndromes

    K. Arron;C. Oliver;J. Moss;K. Berg

  • The prevalence and phenomenology of repetitive behavior in genetic syndromes.

    Joanna Moss;Chris Oliver;Kate Arron;Cheryl Burbidge

  • Self-injurious behaviour in individuals with autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disability

    Caroline Richards;Christopher Oliver;L Nelson;Joanna Moss

  • Patterns of change in children with Autism Spectrum Disorders who received community based comprehensive interventions in their pre-school years: A seven year follow-up study

    Iliana Magiati;Iliana Magiati;Joanna Moss;Tony Charman;Patricia Howlin

  • Prevalence of autism spectrum disorder symptomatology and related behavioural characteristics in individuals with Down syndrome

    Joanna Moss;Caroline Richards;Lisa Nelson;Christopher Oliver

  • Delineation of behavioral phenotypes in genetic syndromes: characteristics of autism spectrum disorder, affect and hyperactivity.

    Chris Oliver;Katy Berg;Joanna Moss;Joanna Moss;Kate Arron

  • Psychological Well-Being in Parents of Children with Angelman, Cornelia de Lange and Cri du Chat Syndromes.

    Gemma Griffith;RP Hastings;Christopher Oliver;P Howlin

  • Prevalence of autism spectrum phenomenology in Cornelia de Lange and Cri du Chat syndromes

    Joanna F. Moss;Chris Oliver;Katy Berg;Gurmeash Kaur

  • Phenotypes and genotypes in individuals with SMC1A variants

    Sylvia Huisman;Paul A. Mulder;Egbert Redeker;Ingrid Bader

  • Autism Characteristics and Behavioural Disturbances in ∼ 500 Children with Down's Syndrome in England and Wales

    Georgina Warner;Joanna Moss;Joanna Moss;Patrick Smith;Patricia Howlin;Patricia Howlin

  • The association between repetitive behaviours, impulsivity and hyperactivity in people with intellectual disability

    C. Burbidge;C. Oliver;J. Moss;K. Arron

  • Characteristics of Autism Spectrum Disorder in Cornelia de Lange Syndrome.

    Jo Moss;Patricia Howlin;Iliana Magiati;Chris Oliver

  • Stability of the Autism Diagnostic Interview—Revised from Pre-School to Elementary School Age in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders

    Jo Moss;Jo Moss;Iliana Magiati;Tony Charman;Patricia Howlin;Patricia Howlin

  • Persistence of self-injurious behaviour in autism spectrum disorder over 3 years: a prospective cohort study of risk markers.

    Caroline Richards;Joanna Moss;Joanna Moss;Lisa Nelson;Christopher Oliver

  • Visual preference for social stimuli in individuals with autism or neurodevelopmental disorders: an eye-tracking study.

    Hayley Crawford;Joanna Moss;Chris Oliver;Natasha Elliott

  • Repetitive Behavior in Rubinstein–Taybi Syndrome: Parallels with Autism Spectrum Phenomenology

    Jane Waite;Joanna Moss;Joanna Moss;Sarah R. Beck;Caroline Richards

  • Delineating the Profile of Autism Spectrum Disorder Characteristics in Cornelia de Lange and Fragile X Syndromes.

    Joanna Moss;Chris Oliver;Lisa Nelson;Caroline Richards

  • Self-injury and aggression in tuberous sclerosis complex: cross syndrome comparison and associated risk markers

    Kate E Eden;Petrus J de Vries;Jo Moss;Jo Moss;Caroline Richards

  • Self-injurious behaviour in individuals with autism spectrum disorder.

    C Richards;C Oliver;L Nelson;J Moss

Frequent Co-Authors

Chris Oliver
Chris Oliver University of Birmingham
Patricia Howlin
Patricia Howlin King's College London
Richard P. Hastings
Richard P. Hastings University of Birmingham
Kim Cornish
Kim Cornish Monash University
Sarah R. Beck
Sarah R. Beck University of Birmingham
David R. FitzPatrick
David R. FitzPatrick University of Edinburgh
Iliana Magiati
Iliana Magiati University of Western Australia
Dawn Adams
Dawn Adams Griffith University
Raoul C.M. Hennekam
Raoul C.M. Hennekam University of Amsterdam
Matthew A. Deardorff
Matthew A. Deardorff Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring an online degree in psychology opens doors to a wealth of career pathways, from counseling and clinical psychology to organizational and educational settings. Many online programs now mirror the quality and diversity of traditional on-campus options, allowing students to study flexibly while preparing for licensure or advanced graduate training.

When selecting the right online psychology degree, it’s important to consider factors such as program accreditation, faculty expertise, and specialized tracks. Researching the best psychology program rankings in Georgia can help you identify top-tier options in the Southeast, whether studying remotely or in blended formats. For students in the Midwest, the best psychology program rankings in Grand Rapids highlight high-quality choices in Michigan, while those interested in North Dakota can review the top psychology programs in Grand Forks.

Additionally, the best psychology program rankings in Greenville showcase strong Southern programs that may offer online or hybrid course options. With so many pathways and flexible learning formats, pursuing a psychology degree online can be an ideal starting point for a dynamic and impactful career.

Best Scientists Citing Joanna Moss

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles