World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
102
Citations
42036
World Ranking
7609
National Ranking
225

Paul S. Myles publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul S. Myles sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 509 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Paul S. Myles D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul S. Myles sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 102 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)

Overview

Paul S. Myles is affiliated with Monash University in Australia and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a focus on several subfields including surgery, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, critical care and intensive care medicine, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, and anesthesiology and pain medicine.

Their research topics encompass:

  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
  • Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Nausea and vomiting management
  • Hip and Femur Fractures
  • Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders

Key recent publications include:

  • "Anaesthetic depth and delirium after major surgery: a randomised clinical trial," 2021, British Journal of Anaesthesia
  • "Risks to healthcare workers following tracheal intubation of patients with COVID-19: a prospective international multicentre cohort study," 2020, Anaesthesia
  • "Measurement of quality of recovery after surgery using the 15-item quality of recovery scale: a systematic review and meta-analysis," 2022, British Journal of Anaesthesia
  • "Dexamethasone and Surgical-Site Infection," 2021, New England Journal of Medicine
  • "An Updated Minimal Clinically Important Difference for the QoR-15 Scale," 2021, Anesthesiology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Paul S. Myles include:

  • Kate Leslie
  • Sophie Wallace
  • Mark Shulman
  • Matthew T.V. Chan
  • Tomás Corcoran

Common publication venues for their work are:

  • British Journal of Anaesthesia
  • Anesthesiology
  • Anaesthesia
  • ANZ Journal of Surgery
  • Anaesthesia and Intensive Care

In recognition of their professional contributions, Paul S. Myles was elected Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) in 2019.

Best Publications

  • Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting

    Tong J Gan;Pierre Diemunsch;Ashraf S Habib;Anthony L Kovac

  • Bispectral index monitoring to prevent awareness during anaesthesia: the B-Aware randomised controlled trial

    Paul S Myles;Kate Leslie;Kate Leslie;John James McNeil;John James McNeil;Andrew Benjamin Forbes;Andrew Benjamin Forbes

  • Epidural anaesthesia and analgesia and outcome of major surgery: a randomised trial

    John R. A. Rigg;Konrad Jamrozik;Konrad Jamrozik;Paul S. Myles;Brendan S. Silbert

  • Patient satisfaction after anaesthesia and surgery: results of a prospective survey of 10,811 patients.

    P S Myles;D L Williams;M Hendrata;H Anderson

  • A comparison of the analgesic efficacy and side-effects of paravertebral vs epidural blockade for thoracotomy—a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

    Richard G Davies;Paul S Myles;Paul S Myles;J M Graham

  • Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia guidelines for the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

    Tong J. Gan;Tricia A. Meyer;Christian C. Apfel;Frances Chung

  • Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40.

    P S Myles;B Weitkamp;K Jones;J Melick

  • Development and psychometric evaluation of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-15.

    Peter A. Stark;Paul S. Myles;Justin A. Burke

  • Restrictive versus Liberal Fluid Therapy for Major Abdominal Surgery

    Paul S Myles;Rinaldo Bellomo;Tomas Corcoran;Tomas Corcoran;Andrew Forbes

  • I. Using the Bland–Altman method to measure agreement with repeated measures

    Paul S Myles;James JiSheng Cui

  • Global patient outcomes after elective surgery: Prospective cohort study in 27 low-, middle- and high-income countries

    T Ahmad;RA Bouwman;I Grigoras;C Aldecoa

  • Transition from acute to chronic pain after surgery.

    Paul Glare;Karin R Aubrey;Paul S Myles

  • Measuring acute postoperative pain using the visual analog scale: the minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptom state.

    P.S. Myles;D.B. Myles;W Galagher;D Boyd

  • Prehospital hypertonic saline resuscitation of Patients with hypotension and severe traumatic brain injury a randomized controlled trial

    Jamie Cooper;Paul S Myles;Francis T McDermott;Lynette J Murray

  • Tranexamic Acid in Patients Undergoing Coronary-Artery Surgery

    Paul S Myles;Julian A Smith;Thomas Painter

  • Development and psychometric testing of a quality of recovery score after general anesthesia and surgery in adults.

    Paul S. Myles;Jennifer O. Hunt;Claire E. Nightingale;Helen Fletcher

  • Perioperative fluid management strategies in major surgery: a stratified meta-analysis.

    Tomas Corcoran;Julia Emma Joy Rhodes;Sarah Clarke;Paul S Myles

  • Epidural analgesia compared with peripheral nerve blockade after major knee surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

    S.J. Fowler;J. Symons;S. Sabato;P.S. Myles;P.S. Myles

  • The pain visual analog scale: is it linear or nonlinear?

    Paul S. Myles;Sally Troedel;Michael Boquest;Mark Reeves

  • Avoidance of nitrous oxide for patients undergoing major surgery - A randomized controlled trial

    Paul S Myles;Kate Leslie;Matthew T V Chan;Andrew Benjamin Forbes

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthew T. V. Chan
Matthew T. V. Chan Chinese University of Hong Kong
Andrew Forbes
Andrew Forbes Monash University
Duminda N. Wijeysundera
Duminda N. Wijeysundera University of Toronto
Rinaldo Bellomo
Rinaldo Bellomo Monash University
Michael P. W. Grocott
Michael P. W. Grocott University of Southampton
John J McNeil
John J McNeil Monash University
Rupert M. Pearse
Rupert M. Pearse Queen Mary University of London
Daniel I. Sessler
Daniel I. Sessler The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Jennie Ponsford
Jennie Ponsford Monash University
David Scott
David Scott Ascension Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative pathways to a medical career can open doors to a variety of rewarding roles in healthcare. Many students are taking advantage of flexible and affordable education options, with cheap online fnp programs offering a cost-effective route for those aiming to become family nurse practitioners.

If you are just beginning your nursing journey, a range of accredited online nursing courses provide foundational knowledge and clinical skills to help you qualify for entry-level positions. For registered nurses ready to advance, cheap rn to bsn programs are designed to build on existing credentials and help students move into higher-paying roles.

For those interested in academic or leadership positions in nursing, phd nursing programs online make it possible to pursue advanced research or teaching opportunities from anywhere in the world.

These online options allow for greater flexibility, making it easier to balance studies with work or family commitments while still pursuing meaningful advancement in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Paul S. Myles

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles