World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
77
Citations
18482
World Ranking
18546
National Ranking
685

Michel Struys publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michel Struys sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 504 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Michel Struys D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michel Struys sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Dexmedetomidine

    Maud A S Weerink;Michel M R F Struys;Michel M R F Struys;Laura N Hannivoort;Clemens R M Barends

  • Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Propofol.

    Marko M. Sahinovic;Michel M. R. F. Struys;Anthony R. Absalom

  • Comparison of Closed-loop Controlled Administration of Propofol Using Bispectral Index as the Controlled Variable versus “Standard Practice” Controlled Administration

    Michel M. R. F. Struys;Tom De Smet;Linda F. M. Versichelen;Stijn Van de Velde

  • Depth of anaesthesia monitoring: what's available, what's validated and what's next?

    J Bruhn;Paul S Myles;R Sneyd;Michel M R F Struys

  • Comparison of plasma compartment versus two methods for effect compartment-controlled target-controlled infusion for propofol

    Michel Struys;T De Smet;B Depoorter;Linda Versichelen

  • Pharmacokinetic models for propofol—defining and illuminating the devil in the detail

    Anthony Absalom;V. Mani;T. de Smet;Michel Struys

  • Intravenous drug delivery systems

    Michel Struys;Anthony R Absalom;Steven L. Shafer

  • Performance of the ARX-derived auditory evoked potential index as an indicator of anesthetic depth: a comparison with bispectral index and hemodynamic measures during propofol administration.

    Michel M. R. F. Struys;Erik Weber Jensen;Warren Smith;N. Ty Smith

  • Ability of the bispectral index, autoregressive modelling with exogenous input-derived auditory evoked potentials, and predicted propofol concentrations to measure patient responsiveness during anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil.

    Michel M. R. F. Struys;Hugo Vereecke;Annelies Moerman;Erik Weber Jensen

  • Use of continuous bispectral EEG monitoring to assess depth of sedation in ICU patients

    C De Deyne;Michel Struys;Johan Decruyenaere;J Creupelandt

  • Influence of steep Trendelenburg position and CO(2) pneumoperitoneum on cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and respiratory homeostasis during robotic prostatectomy.

    Alain Frédéric Kalmar;L. Foubert;J. F. A. Hendrickx;A. Mottrie

  • European Society of Anaesthesiology and European Board of Anaesthesiology guidelines for procedural sedation and analgesia in adults

    Jochen Hinkelbein;Massimo Lamperti;Jonas Akeson;Joao Santos

  • Robust Predictive Control Strategy Applied for Propofol Dosing Using BIS as a Controlled Variable During Anesthesia

    C.M. Ionescu;R. De Keyser;B.C. Torrico;T. De Smet

  • Clinical usefulness of the bispectral index for titrating propofol target effect-site concentration

    Michel Struys;Linda Versichelen;G Byttebier;Eric Mortier

  • Spectral Entropy as an Electroencephalographic Measure of Anesthetic Drug Effect: A Comparison with Bispectral Index and Processed Midlatency Auditory Evoked Response

    Ann L.G. Vanluchene;Hugo Vereecke;Olivier Thas;Eric P. Mortier

  • Pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic model for propofol for broad application in anaesthesia and sedation

    DJ Eleveld;Pieter Colin;Pieter Colin;AR Absalom;Michel Struys;Michel Struys

  • Ischemia and Reperfusion Injury in Kidney Transplantation: Relevant Mechanisms in Injury and Repair.

    Gertrude J Nieuwenhuijs-Moeke;Søren E Pischke;Stefan P Berger;Jan Stephan F Sanders

  • Influence of obesity on propofol pharmacokinetics: derivation of a pharmacokinetic model

    L.I. Cortínez;B.J. Anderson;A Penna;L Olivares

  • Closed‐loop controlled administration of propofol using bispectral analysis

    Eric Mortier;Michel Struys;T De Smet;Linda Versichelen

  • Changes in a surgical stress index in response to standardized pain stimuli during propofol–remifentanil infusion

    Michel Struys;Caroline Vanpeteghem;M Huiku;K Uutela

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven L. Shafer
Steven L. Shafer Stanford University
Grietje Molema
Grietje Molema University Medical Center Groningen
David T. J. Liley
David T. J. Liley University of Melbourne
Peter Heeringa
Peter Heeringa University Medical Center Groningen
Rutger J. Ploeg
Rutger J. Ploeg University of Oxford
Albert Dahan
Albert Dahan Leiden University Medical Center
Ben Willem J. Mol
Ben Willem J. Mol Monash University
Clara-Mihaela Ionescu
Clara-Mihaela Ionescu Ghent University
Robbert Sanderman
Robbert Sanderman University of Groningen
Pascal Verdonck
Pascal Verdonck Ghent University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their career opportunities in healthcare beyond traditional medical school, there are several online degree pathways to consider. If you are a registered nurse seeking advanced practice roles, adn to fnp bridge programs offer a flexible way to pursue a Family Nurse Practitioner degree. These programs streamline the path from an associate’s degree in nursing to a master’s without duplicating previous coursework.

For individuals focused on public health and nutrition, an online bs in nutrition provides a solid foundation for roles in community wellness, dietetics, and health education. If management is your goal, you might explore top cahme-accredited mha programs that can prepare you for leadership in healthcare administration with the advantage of accreditation recognition.

Finally, registered nurses aiming to broaden job options can consider online rn to bsn no clinicals programs. These degrees allow career advancement without additional clinical requirements, ideal for busy professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Michel Struys

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles