World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Clara-Mihaela Ionescu

Clara-Mihaela Ionescu

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
44
Citations
8035
World Ranking
5784
National Ranking
71

Clara-Mihaela Ionescu publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clara-Mihaela Ionescu sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 565 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Clara-Mihaela Ionescu D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clara-Mihaela Ionescu sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • The role of fractional calculus in modeling biological phenomena: A review

    Clara-Mihaela Ionescu;A. Lopes;Dana Copot;J. A. T. Machado

  • Robust Predictive Control Strategy Applied for Propofol Dosing Using BIS as a Controlled Variable During Anesthesia

    C.M. Ionescu;R. De Keyser;B.C. Torrico;T. De Smet

  • A novel auto-tuning method for fractional order PI/PD controllers.

    Robain De Keyser;Cristina I Muresan;Clara-Mihaela Ionescu

  • Modeling of the Lung Impedance Using a Fractional-Order Ladder Network With Constant Phase Elements

    C M Ionescu;J A T Machado;R De Keyser

  • Relations Between Fractional-Order Model Parameters and Lung Pathology in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

    C.M. Ionescu;R. De Keyser

  • Optimized PID control of depth of hypnosis in anesthesia

    Fabrizio Padula;Clara Ionescu;Nicola Latronico;Massimiliano Paltenghi

  • A Remote Laboratory as an Innovative Educational Tool for Practicing Control Engineering Concepts

    Clara M. Ionescu;Ernesto Fabregas;Stefana M. Cristescu;Sebastin Dormido

  • The Human Respiratory System: An Analysis of the Interplay between Anatomy, Structure, Breathing and Fractal Dynamics

    Clara Mihaela Ionescu

  • The Human Respiratory System

    Clara Mihaela Ionescu

  • Advanced Model-Based Control Studies for the Induction and Maintenance of Intravenous Anaesthesia

    Ioana Nascu;Alexandra Krieger;Clara Mihaela Ionescu;Efstratios N. Pistikopoulos

  • Nonlinear predictive control with dead-time compensator: Application to a solar power plant

    Manuel Gálvez-Carrillo;Robain De Keyser;Clara-Mihaela Ionescu

  • The development of an autonomous navigation system with optimal control of an UAV in partly unknown indoor environment

    Thi Thoa Mac;Thi Thoa Mac;Cosmin Copot;Robin De Keyser;Clara M. Ionescu

  • Theoretical Analysis and Experimental Validation of a Simplified Fractional Order Controller for a Magnetic Levitation System

    Silviu Folea;Cristina I. Muresan;Robin De Keyser;Clara M. Ionescu

  • Variable Time-Delay Estimation for Anesthesia Control During Intensive Care

    C M Ionescu;R Hodrea;R De Keyser

  • Nonlinear dynamics of the patient's response to drug effect during general anesthesia

    Clara M. Ionescu;José António Tenreiro Machado;Robin De Keyser;Johan Decruyenaere

  • Mechanical Properties of the Respiratory System Derived From Morphologic Insight

    C.M. Ionescu;P. Segers;R. De Keyser

  • Fractional order control of unstable processes: the magnetic levitation study case

    Cristina I. Muresan;Clara-Mihaela Ionescu;Silviu Folea;Robain De Keyser

  • Decentralized and centralized model predictive control to reduce the bullwhip effect in supply chain management

    Dongfei Fu;Clara-Mihaela Ionescu;El-Houssaine Aghezzaf;Robain De Keyser

  • A Theoretical Study on Modeling the Respiratory Tract With Ladder Networks by Means of Intrinsic Fractal Geometry

    C.M. Ionescu;I. Muntean;J.A. Tenreiro-Machado;R. De Keyser

  • An efficient algorithm for low-order direct discrete-time implementation of fractional order transfer functions.

    Robain De Keyser;Cristina I. Muresan;Clara-Mihaela Ionescu;Clara-Mihaela Ionescu

  • EPSAC-controlled anesthesia with online gain adaptation

    J. Nino;R. De Keyser;S. Syafiie;C. Ionescu

  • Fractional dynamics and its applications

    Yong Zhou;Clara-Mihaela Ionescu;JA Tenreiro Machado

  • The disturbance model in model based predictive control

    R. De Keyser;C.M. Ionescu

  • FRtool: a frequency response tool for CACSD in Matlab (R)

    Robain De Keyser;Clara-Mihaela Ionescu

Frequent Co-Authors

Michel Struys
Michel Struys University Medical Center Groningen
J. A. Tenreiro Machado
J. A. Tenreiro Machado Polytechnic Institute of Porto
El-Houssaine Aghezzaf
El-Houssaine Aghezzaf Ghent University
Jan Swevers
Jan Swevers KU Leuven
Julio E. Normey-Rico
Julio E. Normey-Rico Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
Sylvain Quoilin
Sylvain Quoilin University of Liège
Vincent Lemort
Vincent Lemort University of Liège
Wassim M. Haddad
Wassim M. Haddad Georgia Institute of Technology
Gerd Vandersteen
Gerd Vandersteen Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Nader Meskin
Nader Meskin Qatar University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The landscape of Engineering and Technology education in the USA is rapidly evolving, with more students exploring online learning and diverse career paths. Many top universities now offer specialized programs designed to prepare students for emerging fields. For instance, if you’re eager to work at the forefront of digital finance, a cryptocurrency degree can open doors to opportunities in blockchain, fintech, and related sectors.

Some students may be interested in adjacent fields where engineering and technology play key roles. Those passionate about sports and analytics can pursue one of the best online sports management degrees to blend technical knowledge with industry-specific skills. Similarly, individuals who care about urban environments and sustainable development can explore an online masters in urban planning to impact city planning and infrastructure.

If you’re looking to accelerate your career with advanced credentials, consider enrolling in a masters degree in 6 months. These fast-track programs are ideal for professionals ready to upskill or transition into leadership roles quickly. Each of these online degrees strengthens your career prospects and ensures you stay competitive in today’s global job market.

Best Scientists Citing Clara-Mihaela Ionescu

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles