World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
34
Citations
5600
World Ranking
12088
National Ranking
90

Walid Taha publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Walid Taha sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 149 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Walid Taha D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Walid Taha sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Walid Taha is affiliated with Halmstad University in Sweden and has contributed to research primarily in the field of Computer Science. Their work encompasses various subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Software, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, and Management Science and Operations Research.

The scientist's research covers topics related to Formal Methods in Verification, Software Testing and Debugging Techniques, Radiation Effects in Electronics, Modeling and Simulation Systems, Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques, Simulation Techniques and Applications, and Logic, Programming, and Type Systems.

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Walid Taha include:

  • Conformance Testing of Cyber-Physical Systems: A Comparative Study (2024, Technische Universität Berlin - Universitätsbibliothek)
  • Open Source Languages and Methods for Cyber-Physical System Development: Overview and Case Studies (2021, Electronics)
  • Pre-deployment Analysis of Smart Contracts -- A Survey (2023, arXiv (Cornell University))
  • Sound Over-Approximation of Probabilities (2020, Acta Cybernetica)

Frequent collaborators in their work include Morteza Mohaqeqi, Mohammad Reza Mousavi, Lena Buffoni, Lennart Ochel, and Adrian Pop. These coauthors have contributed to the research output together on various papers across different topics.

Walid Taha's publications appear in a range of venues, including Technische Universität Berlin - Universitätsbibliothek, Electronics, Acta Cybernetica, and arXiv (Cornell University).

Best Publications

  • Gradual typing for objects

    Jeremy Siek;Walid Taha

  • Gradual Typing for Functional Languages

    Jeremy G. Siek;Walid Taha

  • Multi-stage programming with explicit annotations

    Walid Taha;Tim Sheard

  • MetaML and Multi-Stage Programming with Explicit Annotations

    Walid Taha;Tim Sheard

  • Multi-Stage Programming: Its Theory and Applications

    Walid Mohamed Taha;Tim Sheard

  • A Gentle Introduction to Multi-stage Programming

    Walid Taha

  • Implementing multi-stage languages using ASTs, Gensym, and reflection

    Cristiano Calcagno;Walid Taha;Liwen Huang;Xavier Leroy

  • Real-time FRP

    Zhanyong Wan;Walid Taha;Paul Hudak

  • Environment classifiers

    Walid Taha;Michael Florentin Nielsen

  • DSL Implementation in MetaOCaml, Template Haskell, and C++

    Krzysztof Czarnecki;John T. O’Donnell;Jörg Striegnitz;Walid Taha

  • Event-Driven FRP

    Zhanyong Wan;Walid Taha;Paul Hudak

  • Macros as multi-stage computations: type-safe, generative, binding macros in MacroML

    Steven E. Ganz;Amr Sabry;Walid Taha

  • An Idealized MetaML: Simpler, and More Expressive

    Eugenio Moggi;Walid Taha;Zine-El-Abidine Benaissa;Tim Sheard

  • Tagless staged interpreters for typed languages

    Emir PašaliΕ;Walid Taha;Tim Sheard

  • A sound reduction semantics for untyped CBN multi-stage computation. Or, the theory of MetaML is non-trival

    Walid Taha

  • Multi-Stage Programming: Axiomatization and Type Safety

    Walid Taha;Zine-El-Abidine Benaissa;Tim Sheard

  • Exploring the Design Space of Higher-Order Casts

    Jeremy Siek;Ronald Garcia;Walid Taha

  • ‘Semantics, Applications, and Implementation of Program Generation’

    Walid Taha

  • A sound reduction semantics for untyped CBN mutli-stage computation. Or, the theory of MetaML is non-trival (extended abstract)

    Walid Taha

  • E-FRP with priorities

    Roumen Kaiabachev;Walid Taha;Angela Zhu

  • Domain-Specific Languages

    Walid Mohamed Taha

Frequent Co-Authors

Tim Sheard
Tim Sheard Portland State University
Jeremy G. Siek
Jeremy G. Siek Indiana University
Marcia K. O'Malley
Marcia K. O'Malley Rice University
Charles Consel
Charles Consel Institut Polytechnique de Bordeaux
Aaron D. Ames
Aaron D. Ames California Institute of Technology
Paul Hudak
Paul Hudak Yale University
Cristiano Calcagno
Cristiano Calcagno Imperial College London
Don Batory
Don Batory The University of Texas at Austin
Krzysztof Czarnecki
Krzysztof Czarnecki University of Waterloo
Karl-Erik Årzén
Karl-Erik Årzén Lund University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science opens doors to a wide variety of online degrees and career pathways in the USA. Today’s students can design their education to suit their time constraints, budget, and career goals, thanks to flexible, accredited online programs.

For those looking to enter the workforce quickly or upskill fast, short certificate programs that pay well offer a strong stepping stone. Similarly, 1 year associate degree programs online allow learners to earn a recognized credential in less time, enabling a swift transition to entry-level technology positions.

Career advancement can also be accelerated through quickest masters degree online programs, which let professionals earn advanced qualifications at an expedited pace. For those prioritizing return on investment and long-term growth, it is essential to consider the most useful graduate degrees to ensure their studies lead to in-demand roles in the tech industry.

Overall, the growth of online education empowers students to tailor their computer science learning journey to fit diverse needs and career aspirations.

Best Scientists Citing Walid Taha

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles