World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
74
Citations
24462
World Ranking
19318
National Ranking
9624

Steven L. Shafer publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven L. Shafer sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 376 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Steven L. Shafer D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven L. Shafer sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Steven L. Shafer is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a particular focus on anesthesiology and pain medicine, as well as surgery, infectious diseases, public health, environmental and occupational health, and pediatrics, perinatology, and child health.

Their research encompasses multiple topics, including:

  • Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
  • Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Pain Management and Opioid Use

Among the recent papers authored or co-authored by Steven L. Shafer are:

  • "Further retractions of articles by Joachim Boldt" (2020), British Journal of Anaesthesia
  • "Rapidly scalable mechanical ventilator for the COVID-19 pandemic" (2020), Intensive Care Medicine
  • "Chronic disabling postpartum headache after unintentional dural puncture during epidural anaesthesia: a prospective cohort study" (2021), British Journal of Anaesthesia
  • "Design of Clinical Trials Evaluating Sedation in Critically Ill Adults Undergoing Mechanical Ventilation: Recommendations From Sedation Consortium on Endpoints and Procedures for Treatment, Education, and Research (SCEPTER) Recommendation III" (2021), Critical Care Medicine
  • "Ondansetron to reduce neonatal opioid withdrawal severity a randomized clinical trial" (2022), Journal of Perinatology

Frequent collaborators in Steven L. Shafer's work include:

  • Richard Simoneaux (31 publications together)
  • Dibash Kumar Das (12 publications together)
  • Pamela Flood (6 publications together)
  • Jessica Ansari (4 publications together)
  • Albert Kwon (2 publications together)

Their work has been published primarily in the following venues:

  • ASA Monitor (72 publications)
  • British Journal of Anaesthesia (5 publications)
  • Anesthesiology (4 publications)
  • Anesthesia & Analgesia (3 publications)
  • Intensive Care Medicine (1 publication)

Best Publications

  • Influence of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. I. Model development

    Charles F. Minto;Thomas W. Schnider;Talmage D. Egan;Elizabeth Youngs

  • The Influence of Method of Administration and Covariates on the Pharmacokinetics of Propofol in Adult Volunteers

    Thomas W. Schnider;Charles F. Minto;Pedro L. Gambus;Corina Andresen

  • The Influence of Age on Propofol Pharmacodynamics

    Thomas W. Schnider;Charles F. Minto;Steven L. Shafer;Pedro L. Gambus

  • Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Remifentanil: II. Model Application

    Charles F. Minto;Thomas W. Schnider;Steven L. Shafer

  • The pharmacokinetics of the new short-acting opioid remifentanil (GI87084B) in healthy adult male volunteers.

    Talmage D. Egan;Harry J. M. Lemmens;Pierre Fiset;David J. Hermann

  • Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Rational Opioid Selection

    Steven L. Shafer;John R. Varvel

  • Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol infusions during general anesthesia.

    Audrey Shafer;Van A. Doze;Steven L. Shafer;Paul F. White

  • Measuring the predictive performance of computer-controlled infusion pumps

    John R. Varvel;David L. Donoho;Steven L. Shafer

  • Remifentanil versus alfentanil: comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in healthy adult male volunteers.

    Talmage D. Egan;Charles F. Minto;David J. Hermann;Juliana Barr

  • Pharmacodynamic interaction between propofol and remifentanil regarding hypnosis, tolerance of laryngoscopy, bispectral index, and electroencephalographic approximate entropy.

    Thomas W. Bouillon;Jörgen Bruhn;Lucian Radulescu;Corina Andresen

  • Response surface model for anesthetic drug interactions.

    Charles F. Minto;Thomas W. Schnider;Timothy G. Short;Keith M. Gregg

  • Absorption characteristics of transdermally administered fentanyl.

    J. R. Varvel;S. L. Shafer;S. S. Hwang;P. A. Coen

  • The Pharmacokinetics of Propofol in Children Using Three Different Data Analysis Approaches

    Bideshwar K. Kataria;Sudha A. Ved;Honorato F. Nicodemus;Gregory R. Hoy

  • Comparison of plasma compartment versus two methods for effect compartment-controlled target-controlled infusion for propofol

    Michel Struys;T De Smet;B Depoorter;Linda Versichelen

  • The Pharmacokinetics and Hemodynamic Effects of Intravenous and Intramuscular Dexmedetomidine Hydrochloride in Adult Human Volunteers

    J B Dyck;M Maze;C Haack;L Vuorilehto

  • Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl administered by computer-controlled infusion pump.

    Steven L. Shafer;John R. Varvel;Natasha Aziz;James C. Scott

  • Intravenous drug delivery systems

    Michel Struys;Anthony R Absalom;Steven L. Shafer

  • Algorithms to rapidly achieve and maintain stable drug concentrations at the site of drug effect with a computer-controlled infusion pump.

    Steven L. Shafer;Keith M. Gregg

  • Influence of Age and Gender on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Remifentanil: I. Model Development

    Charles F. Minto;Thomas W. Schnider;Talmage D. Egan;Elizabeth Youngs

  • Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Remifentanil: II. Model Application

    Charles F. Minto;Thomas W. Schnider;Steven L. Shafer;George F. Rich

Frequent Co-Authors

Donald R. Stanski
Donald R. Stanski Stanford University School of Medicine
Michel Struys
Michel Struys University Medical Center Groningen
James C. Eisenach
James C. Eisenach Wake Forest University
Mervyn Maze
Mervyn Maze University of California, San Francisco
Daniel I. Sessler
Daniel I. Sessler The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Franklin Dexter
Franklin Dexter University of Iowa
Tony L. Yaksh
Tony L. Yaksh University of California, San Diego
Paul F. White
Paul F. White Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Jerrold H. Levy
Jerrold H. Levy Duke University
Evan D. Kharasch
Evan D. Kharasch Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in a flexible path into healthcare or medicine, a range of online degree options can help you prepare for diverse career opportunities. Those aiming for leadership or administrative roles may want to explore a health administration degree. This degree teaches critical management, policy, and organizational skills, ideal for running healthcare facilities.

For those seeking advanced qualifications, many institutions now offer affordable online mha programs (Master of Healthcare Administration). These programs prepare graduates to oversee complex healthcare systems, improve patient care quality, and implement policy changes.

Registered nurses looking to move into advanced clinical or leadership roles can consider the best online dnp programs (Doctor of Nursing Practice). These programs provide high-level expertise in evidence-based practice and healthcare innovation.

Aspiring pharmacists can now complete a 3 year online pharmd—a fast-track doctorate in pharmacy that combines flexibility with rigorous clinical training.

All these online pathways offer affordable, accredited options to launch or advance your healthcare career, providing convenience without compromising on quality.

Best Scientists Citing Steven L. Shafer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles