What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
Miguel B. Gaspar mainly investigates Ecology, Fishery, Bivalvia, Benthic zone and Oceanography.
Miguel B. Gaspar has researched Ecology in several fields, including Proteome and Inlet.
His work on Spisula, Fishing and Fisheries management as part of general Fishery study is frequently linked to Scombridae, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of science.
The Artisanal fishing research Miguel B. Gaspar does as part of his general Fishing study is frequently linked to other disciplines of science, such as Scale and On board, therefore creating a link between diverse domains of science.
Mollusca and Zoology are the main topics of his Bivalvia study.
His Benthic zone research incorporates themes from Biomass, Organic matter, Sediment and Ecosystem.
His most cited work include:
- Weight–length relationships for 50 selected fish species of the Algarve coast (southern Portugal) (114 citations)
- Small scale fisheries in Europe: A comparative analysis based on a selection of case studies (105 citations)
- Growth and extremely high production of the non-indigenous invasive species Corbicula fluminea (Muller, 1774): Possible implications for ecosystem functioning (91 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary areas of study are Fishery, Ecology, Fishing, Oceanography and Bivalvia.
His work in the fields of Fishery, such as Spisula, Fisheries management and Bycatch, intersects with other areas such as Portuguese.
His study looks at the relationship between Ecology and topics such as Zoology, which overlap with Mediterranean sea.
His Fishing research includes themes of Ecosystem and Hake.
The subject of his Bivalvia research is within the realm of Mollusca.
His research in Benthic zone intersects with topics in Sediment and Intertidal zone.
He most often published in these fields:
- Fishery (58.13%)
- Ecology (37.93%)
- Fishing (38.92%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2021)?
- Fishery (58.13%)
- Fishing (38.92%)
- Ecology (37.93%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His main research concerns Fishery, Fishing, Ecology, Abundance and Estuary.
His Spisula study in the realm of Fishery connects with subjects such as Portuguese.
Many of his research projects under Fishing are closely connected to Context and Semi automatic with Context and Semi automatic, tying the diverse disciplines of science together.
The Ecology study combines topics in areas such as Evolutionary biology and Genetic structure, Genetic diversity.
He combines subjects such as Continental shelf, Oceanography, Benthic zone, Alpha diversity and Spatial ecology with his study of Abundance.
His Estuary research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Von bertalanffy, Fecundity, Sediment, Ruditapes and Gill.
Between 2015 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Biallelic RIPK1 mutations in humans cause severe immunodeficiency, arthritis, and intestinal inflammation (82 citations)
- Biallelic JAK1 mutations in immunodeficient patient with mycobacterial infection. (44 citations)
- How functional traits of estuarine macrobenthic assemblages respond to metal contamination (29 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
His scientific interests lie mostly in Fishery, Ecology, Estuary, Ruditapes and Portuguese.
His Fishery study incorporates themes from Gastropoda, Hexaplex trunculus, Bolinus brandaris and Muricidae.
His study in Ecology is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Evolutionary biology and Genetic diversity.
Miguel B. Gaspar has included themes like Fishing, Sediment and Peninsula in his Estuary study.
His Sediment study combines topics in areas such as Dominance, Polychaete, Community structure and Predation.
His research investigates the connection with Ruditapes and areas like Invasive species which intersect with concerns in Interspecific competition, Ruditapes decussatus, Development of the gonads, Sexual maturity and Gonad.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
