World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
46
Citations
17689
World Ranking
6659
National Ranking
2942

Johan Bollen publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Johan Bollen sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 129 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Johan Bollen D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Johan Bollen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Johan Bollen is affiliated with Indiana University in the United States. Their research spans several fields primarily focused on psychology and social sciences, with specific subfields including sociology and political science, social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, artificial intelligence, and statistical and nonlinear physics.

The scientist's main topics of work cover a range that intersects mental health and information dynamics. These topics include:

  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Mental Health via Writing
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence

Bollen has contributed notably in various publication venues, frequently publishing in:

  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • PLoS ONE
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Scientific Reports

Collaborations are a significant part of Bollen's research activity. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Marijn ten Thij
  • Lauren A. Rutter
  • Lorenzo Lorenzo-Luaces
  • Danny Valdez
  • Krishna C. Bathina

Among Bollen's recent papers are:

  • Modeling Public Mood and Emotion: Twitter Sentiment and Socio-Economic Phenomena, 2021, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • Historical language records reveal a surge of cognitive distortions in recent decades, 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

In addition, Bollen has contributed to research linked with:

  • Social Media Insights Into US Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Longitudinal Analysis of Twitter Data, 2020, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Individuals with depression express more distorted thinking on social media, 2021, Nature Human Behaviour
  • Misinformation and Public Health Messaging in the Early Stages of the Mpox Outbreak: Mapping the Twitter Narrative With Deep Learning, 2023, Journal of Medical Internet Research

Best Publications

  • Twitter mood predicts the stock market.

    Johan Bollen;Huina Mao;Xiaojun Zeng

  • Modeling Public Mood and Emotion: Twitter Sentiment and Socio-Economic Phenomena

    Johan Bollen;Huina Mao;Alberto Pepe

  • Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community

    Xiaoming Liu;Johan Bollen;Michael L. Nelson;Herbert Van de Sompel

  • A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures.

    Johan Bollen;Herbert Van de Sompel;Aric A. Hagberg;Ryan Chute

  • Computational Fact Checking from Knowledge Networks

    Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia;Prashant Shiralkar;Luis Mateus Rocha;Luis Mateus Rocha;Johan Bollen

  • More Tweets, More Votes: Social Media as a Quantitative Indicator of Political Behavior

    Joseph DiGrazia;Karissa McKelvey;Johan Bollen;Fabio Rojas

  • How the scientific community reacts to newly submitted preprints: article downloads, Twitter mentions, and citations.

    Xin Shuai;Alberto Pepe;Johan Bollen

  • Happiness is assortative in online social networks

    Johan Bollen;Bruno Gonçalves;Guangchen Ruan;Huina Mao

  • Toward alternative metrics of journal impact: a comparison of download and citation data

    Johan Bollen;Herbert Van de Sompel;Joan A. Smith;Rick Luce

  • The evolution of complexity

    Francis Heylighen;Johan Bollen;Alexander Riegler

  • Twitter Mood as a Stock Market Predictor

    J. Bollen;Huina Mao

  • Clickstream Data Yields High-Resolution Maps of Science

    Johan Bollen;Herbert Van de Sompel;Aric Hagberg;Luís M. A. Bettencourt;Luís M. A. Bettencourt

  • Social Media Insights Into US Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Longitudinal Analysis of Twitter Data

    Danny Valdez;Marijn Ten Thij;Krishna Bathina;Lauren Alexandra Rutter

  • Usage bibliometrics

    Michael J. Kurtz;Johan Bollen

  • Usage impact factor: The effects of sample characteristics on usage-based impact metrics

    Johan Bollen;Herbert Van de Sompel

  • Modeling public mood and emotion: Twitter sentiment and socio-economic phenomena

    Johan Bollen;Alberto Pepe;Huina Mao

  • The World-Wide Web as a Super-Brain: from metaphor to model

    Francis Heylighen;Johan Bollen;Leo Apostel

  • Predicting Financial Markets: Comparing Survey, News, Twitter and Search Engine Data

    Huina Mao;Scott Counts;Johan Bollen

  • Evaluation of Digital Library Impact and User Communities by Analysis of Usage Patterns

    Johan Bollen;Richard Luce

  • An algorithm to determine peer-reviewers

    Marko A. Rodriguez;Johan Bollen

  • The evolution of complexity : the violet book of“Einstein meets Magritte"/ edited by Francis Heylighen, Johan Bollen and Alexander Riegler

    Francis Heylighen;Johan Bollen;Alex Riegler

Frequent Co-Authors

Herbert Van de Sompel
Herbert Van de Sompel Ghent University
Carlos Gershenson
Carlos Gershenson Binghamton University
Marten Scheffer
Marten Scheffer Wageningen University & Research
Ying Ding
Ying Ding The University of Texas at Austin
Scott Counts
Scott Counts Microsoft (United States)
Katy Börner
Katy Börner Indiana University
David J. Crandall
David J. Crandall Indiana University
Filippo Radicchi
Filippo Radicchi Indiana University
Luís M. A. Bettencourt
Luís M. A. Bettencourt University of Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education offers flexibility and a wide range of opportunities for those pursuing Computer Science or related fields. Affordable programs are increasingly accessible, making it easier to enter or advance in tech-driven careers. For those looking to start their journey, consider reviewing the cheapest online bachelor degree options available. These programs are designed to provide a strong foundation without burdensome tuition costs.

If you are interested in more specialized technical fields, there are numerous engineering online programs to choose from. These degrees can open doors to roles in software, electronics, and systems engineering.

For experienced professionals aiming to move into management, an advanced credential like an MBA can be crucial. Explore your options with executive mba programs that are both credible and cost-effective.

Tech careers also intersect with fields like information management. If you're fascinated by digital archives, data organization, or user information systems, learning about mlis degree online cost can help you find the right path at the right price.

Best Scientists Citing Johan Bollen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles