World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
44
Citations
10540
World Ranking
7450
National Ranking
3245

Scott Counts publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott Counts sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 102 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Scott Counts D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott Counts sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Scott Counts is affiliated with Microsoft in the United States and has a research focus spanning medicine and neuroscience. Their scholarly contributions concentrate on diverse aspects of neurological and molecular biology research, with particular emphasis on Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and neurodegenerative mechanisms.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Medicine
  • Neuroscience

Within these areas, their subfields of study cover:

  • Neurology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Physiology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cancer Research

Key research topics addressed by Scott Counts comprise:

  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • MicroRNA in disease regulation
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining

Recent publications authored or coauthored include:

  • Predicting Depression via Social Media (2021), Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • Not All Moods Are Created Equal! Exploring Human Emotional States in Social Media (2021), Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • Understanding Anti-Vaccination Attitudes in Social Media (2021), Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • MicroRNA-298 reduces levels of human amyloid-β precursor protein (APP), β-site APP-converting enzyme 1 (BACE1) and specific tau protein moieties (2020), Molecular Psychiatry
  • Clearance of interstitial fluid (ISF) and CSF (CLIC) group-part of Vascular Professional Interest Area (PIA) (2020), Alzheimer's & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Scott Counts include:

  • John S. Beck
  • Bryan Maloney
  • Debomoy K. Lahiri
  • Ruizhi Wang
  • Stephen D. Ginsberg

Their publications are often found in these venues:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • PLoS ONE

Best Publications

  • Predicting Depression via Social Media

    Munmun De Choudhury;Michael Gamon;Scott Counts;Eric Horvitz

  • Predicting the Speed, Scale, and Range of Information Diffusion in Twitter

    Jiang Yang;Scott Counts

  • Tweeting is believing?: understanding microblog credibility perceptions

    Meredith Ringel Morris;Scott Counts;Asta Roseway;Aaron Hoff

  • Social media as a measurement tool of depression in populations

    Munmun De Choudhury;Scott Counts;Eric Horvitz

  • Predicting postpartum changes in emotion and behavior via social media

    Munmun De Choudhury;Scott Counts;Eric Horvitz

  • Identifying topical authorities in microblogs

    Aditya Pal;Scott Counts

  • Characterizing and predicting postpartum depression from shared facebook data

    Munmun De Choudhury;Scott Counts;Eric J. Horvitz;Aaron Hoff

  • Group-centric location tagging for mobile devices

    Scott Counts;Jordan Schwartz;Shelly Farnham

  • Not All Moods Are Created Equal! Exploring Human Emotional States in Social Media

    Munmun De Choudhury;Scott Counts;Michael Gamon

  • Method for selecting opponent of online game using play style information

    Scott Counts;Shelly D Farnham;William B Fulton;Bruce Christopher Phillips

  • Understanding Anti-Vaccination Attitudes in Social Media

    Tanushree Mitra;Scott Counts;James W. Pennebaker

  • Supporting social presence through lightweight photo sharing on and off the desktop

    Scott Counts;Eric Fellheimer

  • Dynamic group formation for social interaction

    Scott Counts;Shelly Farnham;Jordan Schwartz

  • Implicit group formation around feed content for mobile devices

    Scott J. Counts;Shelly D. Farnham;Jordan L K Schwartz

  • Major life changes and behavioral markers in social media: case of childbirth

    Munmun De Choudhury;Scott Counts;Eric Horvitz

  • Understanding affect in the workplace via social media

    Munmun De Choudhury;Scott Counts

  • Morphing social networks based on user context

    Lili Cheng;Scott J. Counts;Danyel Aharon Fisher;Dragos A. Manolescu

  • Predicting Financial Markets: Comparing Survey, News, Twitter and Search Engine Data

    Huina Mao;Scott Counts;Johan Bollen

  • Mobile social networking as information ground: A case study

    Scott Counts;Karen E. Fisher

  • Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work

    Amy Bruckman;Scott Counts;Cliff Lampe;Loren Terveen

  • Determining physical location based upon received signals

    Scott J. Counts;John C. Krumm;Jordan L. K. Schwartz;Steve C. Glenner

Frequent Co-Authors

Munmun De Choudhury
Munmun De Choudhury Georgia Institute of Technology
Emre Kiciman
Emre Kiciman Microsoft (United States)
Michael Gamon
Michael Gamon Microsoft (United States)
Eric Horvitz
Eric Horvitz Microsoft (United States)
danah boyd
danah boyd Microsoft (United States)
Johan Bollen
Johan Bollen Indiana University
Marc A. Smith
Marc A. Smith Connected Action Consulting Group
Lili Cheng
Lili Cheng Microsoft (United States)
Cliff Lampe
Cliff Lampe University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Mary Czerwinski
Mary Czerwinski Microsoft (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens the door to various online degree options and diverse career pathways. For those just getting started or seeking a flexible entry point, pursuing an associate's degree online can be a cost-effective and practical way to lay a solid foundation.

Affordability is a major consideration for many students. Luckily, there are numerous options among the cheapest online colleges, allowing students to obtain quality education without incurring significant debt.

If academic history is a concern, there are online schools that accept low gpa, making higher education accessible for a wider range of learners.

A background in computer science can also open up interdisciplinary opportunities, such as tech-focused roles in other fields. For instance, you might consider tech-related jobs for environmental science majors like data analysis or software development for sustainability projects. The flexibility of these degree and career pathways ensures a pathway for every learner.

Best Scientists Citing Scott Counts

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles