World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
66
Citations
78906
World Ranking
926
National Ranking
436

danah boyd publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where danah boyd sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 176 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

danah boyd D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where danah boyd sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

danah boyd is affiliated with Microsoft in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of social sciences, particularly focusing on areas where technology intersects with society. Their research includes significant work on privacy, ethics, and the societal impacts of artificial intelligence.

The main fields of study where danah boyd has published include social sciences, with subfields such as artificial intelligence, sociology and political science, safety research, communication, and education.

Their research addresses various topics including:

  • Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Data Quality and Management
  • Social Media and Politics

danah boyd has published multiple papers encompassing these areas, including:

  • Differential Perspectives: Epistemic Disconnects Surrounding the U.S. Census Bureau's Use of Differential Privacy, 2022, Harvard Data Science Review
  • Questioning the legitimacy of data, 2020, Information Services & Use
  • Narcotweets: Social Media in Wartime, 2021, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • Machine Unlearning Doesn't Do What You Think: Lessons for Generative AI Policy, Research, and Practice, 2025, SSRN Electronic Journal
  • The Structuring Work of Algorithms, 2023, Daedalus

They have frequently collaborated with several coauthors, including Jayshree Sarathy, A. Feder Cooper, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Miranda Bogen, and Matthew Jagielski.

danah boyd's scholarly output is published in various venues, with multiple papers appearing in Harvard Data Science Review and SSRN Electronic Journal, along with contributions to Information Services & Use, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, and Daedalus.

In addition to journal articles, danah boyd has a book publication through Yale University Press titled It's Complicated, published in 2020.

Best Publications

  • Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship

    Danah M. Boyd;Nicole B. Ellison

  • CRITICAL QUESTIONS FOR BIG DATA

    danah boyd;Kate Crawford

  • I Tweet Honestly, I Tweet Passionately: Twitter Users, Context Collapse, and the Imagined Audience

    Alice E. Marwick;danah boyd

  • It's Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens

    Danah Boyd

  • Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter

    Danah Boyd;Scott Golder;Gilad Lotan

  • Public Displays of Connection

    J. Donath;D. Boyd

  • Why Youth Heart Social Network Sites: The Role of Networked Publics in Teenage Social Life

    Danah Boyd

  • Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications

    Danah Boyd

  • Sociality Through Social Network Sites

    Nicole B. Ellison;Danah M. Boyd

  • The Arab Spring| The Revolutions Were Tweeted: Information Flows during the 2011 Tunisian and Egyptian Revolutions

    Gilad Lotan;Erhardt Graeff;Mike Ananny;Devin Gaffney

  • HT06, tagging paper, taxonomy, Flickr, academic article, to read

    Cameron Marlow;Mor Naaman;Danah Boyd;Marc Davis

  • Living and Learning with New Media: Summary of Findings from the Digital Youth Project

    Mizuko Ito;Heather A. Horst;Matteo Bittanti;danah boyd

  • The Revolutions Were Tweeted: Information Flows During the 2011 Tunisian and Egyptian Revolutions

    Gilad Lotan;Erhardt Graeff;Mike Ananny;Devin Gaffney

  • To See and Be Seen: Celebrity Practice on Twitter

    Alice Marwick;danah boyd

  • Networked privacy: How teenagers negotiate context in social media

    Alice E Marwick;danah boyd

  • Fairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical Systems

    Andrew D. Selbst;Danah Boyd;Sorelle A. Friedler;Suresh Venkatasubramanian

  • Vizster: visualizing online social networks

    J. Heer;D. Boyd

  • Participatory Culture in a Networked Era: A Conversation on Youth, Learning, Commerce, and Politics

    Henry Jenkins;Mizuko Ito;Danah Boyd

  • Dynamic Debates: An Analysis of Group Polarization Over Time on Twitter

    Sarita Yardi;Danah Boyd

  • Taken Out of Context: American Teen Sociality in Networked Publics

    Danah Michele Boyd

Frequent Co-Authors

Alice E. Marwick
Alice E. Marwick University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Emre Kiciman
Emre Kiciman Microsoft (United States)
Kate Crawford
Kate Crawford Microsoft (United States)
Scott Counts
Scott Counts Microsoft (United States)
Nicole B. Ellison
Nicole B. Ellison University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Henry Jenkins
Henry Jenkins University of Southern California
Michele L. Ybarra
Michele L. Ybarra Johns Hopkins University
Eszter Hargittai
Eszter Hargittai University of Zurich
Jennifer Langhinrichsen-Rohling
Jennifer Langhinrichsen-Rohling University of North Carolina at Charlotte

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to rewarding online degree options and diverse career pathways. Students increasingly seek flexible programs to balance studies with personal and professional commitments.

For those interested in counseling, pursuing cacrep-accredited programs online ensures a quality education that meets industry standards. Aspiring therapists may opt for an online masters in marriage and family therapy, leading to impactful roles supporting families and couples.

Learners on a budget can consider some of the cheapest psychology degree online opportunities. This makes acquiring fundamental psychology knowledge more accessible and affordable.

Those drawn to social work can benefit from msw online programs, allowing graduates to quickly enter fields that make a difference in people’s lives.

No matter your interest, these online pathways offer flexibility, affordability, and accredited credentials, helping you form a solid foundation for a meaningful career in the Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing danah boyd

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles