World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 44 3976 3669 1888 1710 99 20319

Kate Crawford publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kate Crawford between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kate Crawford published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 5.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2016. 11 of the 126 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2016. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 4 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 6 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 5 publications
2002 2025

126 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kate Crawford: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 2
2004 1
2005 1
2006 4
2007 2
2008 1
2009 6
2010 7
2011 4
2012 11
2013 11
2014 10
2015 7
2016 16
2017 4
2018 2
2019 4
2020 5
2021 4
2022 5
2023 7
2024 6
2025 5
Total 126
Download as CSV

Kate Crawford publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kate Crawford sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 94–103 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 99 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390 99
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Kate Crawford D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kate Crawford sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269 44
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Kate Crawford is a researcher primarily affiliated with Microsoft in the United States. Their scholarly work is situated within the broad field of Computer Science, with a significant focus on subfields such as Artificial Intelligence, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism.

The main topics of their research encompass Ethics and Social Impacts of AI, Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), Machine Learning and Data Classification, Data Stream Mining Techniques, Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data, Law, AI, and Intellectual Property, as well as Data Quality and Management.

Kate Crawford has published extensively in various academic venues. Frequent places for their publications include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Communications of the ACM
  • AI & Society
  • Nature
  • Issues in Science and Technology

The researcher has contributed to several recent papers, including:

  • "Atlas of AI: Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence" (2022), published in Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith
  • "Datasheets for datasets" (2021), published in Communications of the ACM
  • "Enchanted Determinism: Power without Responsibility in Artificial Intelligence" (2020), published in Engaging Science Technology and Society
  • "Excavating AI: the politics of images in machine learning training sets" (2021), published in AI & Society
  • "Young people, social media, social network sites and sexual health communication in Australia: 'This is funny, you should watch it'" (2024), published in Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham)

Kate Crawford has published books through Yale University Press, including "Atlas of AI" (2021) and "The Atlas of AI" (2021).

Frequent collaborators in their research include Mike Ananny, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, Hanna Wallach, Hal Daumé, and Alexandra Sasha Luccioni.

Best Publications

  • CRITICAL QUESTIONS FOR BIG DATA

    danah boyd;Kate Crawford

  • Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability

    Mike Ananny;Kate Crawford

  • Datasheets for datasets

    Timnit Gebru;Jamie Morgenstern;Briana Vecchione;Jennifer Wortman Vaughan

  • Big Data and Due Process: Toward a Framework to Redress Predictive Privacy Harms

    Kate Crawford;Jason M. Schultz

  • Following you: Disciplines of listening in social media

    Kate Crawford

  • What is a flag for? Social media reporting tools and the vocabulary of complaint

    Kate Crawford;Tarleton Gillespie

  • There is a blind spot in AI research

    Kate Crawford;Ryan Calo

  • Our metrics, ourselves: A hundred years of self-tracking from the weight scale to the wrist wearable device:

    Kate Crawford;Jessa Lingel;Tero Karppi

  • Six Provocations for Big Data

    Danah Boyd;Kate Crawford

  • #qldfloods and @QPSMedia: Crisis communication on Twitter in the 2011 South East Queensland floods - Research Report

    Axel Bruns;Jean Burgess;Kate Crawford;Frances Shaw

  • The Conservatism of Emoji: Work, Affect, and Communication

    Luke Stark;Kate Crawford;Kate Crawford

  • Where are Human Subjects in Big Data Research? The Emerging Ethics Divide

    Jacob Metcalf;Kate Crawford

  • Dirty Data, Bad Predictions: How Civil Rights Violations Impact Police Data, Predictive Policing Systems, and Justice

    Rashida Richardson;Jason Schultz;Kate Crawford

  • Limitless Worker Surveillance

    Ifeoma Ajunwa;Kate Crawford;Jason Schultz

  • Sexting, consent and young people's ethics: Beyond Megan's Story

    Kath Albury;Kate Crawford

  • Ten simple rules for responsible big data research

    Matthew Zook;Solon Barocas;danah boyd;Kate Crawford;Kate Crawford

  • Big Data| Critiquing Big Data: Politics, Ethics, Epistemology | Special Section Introduction

    Kate Crawford;Mary L. Gray;Kate Miltner

  • Can an Algorithm be Agonistic? Ten Scenes from Life in Calculated Publics:

    Kate Crawford;Kate Crawford

  • Enchanted Determinism: Power without Responsibility in Artificial Intelligence

    Alexander Campolo;Kate Crawford

  • Departing glances: A sociotechnical account of ‘leaving’ Grindr

    Jed R Brubaker;Mike Ananny;Kate Crawford

  • The Hidden Biases in Big Data

    Kate Crawford

Frequent Co-Authors

Jean Burgess
Jean Burgess Queensland University of Technology
Axel Bruns
Axel Bruns Queensland University of Technology
danah boyd
danah boyd Microsoft (United States)
Hanna Wallach
Hanna Wallach Microsoft (United States)
Fernando Diaz
Fernando Diaz Microsoft (United States)
Arvind Narayanan
Arvind Narayanan Princeton University
Leysia Palen
Leysia Palen University of Colorado Boulder
Hal Daumé
Hal Daumé University of Maryland, College Park
Matthew Zook
Matthew Zook University of Kentucky
Alyssa A. Goodman
Alyssa A. Goodman Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their studies in Social Sciences and Humanities, online degree programs offer flexible and affordable options. Many universities now feature affordable msw programs online for students seeking careers in social work, community engagement, or counseling. These programs deliver comprehensive coursework with the convenience of remote study.

If your interest lies in behavioral analysis, consider exploring bcba accredited programs online—these are designed to meet certification requirements while reducing costs and commute times. Students can also benefit from one year msw programs, which fast-track the path to graduation without sacrificing academic quality.

For those focusing on psychology, there are accelerated psychology degree pathways available online, allowing students to complete their studies in less time and enter the job market faster. Choosing the right online program can greatly impact your professional development and help you achieve your career goals efficiently.

Best Scientists Citing Kate Crawford

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles