World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
48
Citations
14621
World Ranking
6043
National Ranking
2725

Marc A. Smith publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc A. Smith sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 132 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Marc A. Smith D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc A. Smith sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marc A. Smith is affiliated with Connected Action Consulting Group in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Social Sciences, with specific focus on subfields that include Communication, Health, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, and Social Psychology.

Their work addresses several main topics related to social media and health education, wikis in education and collaboration, knowledge management and sharing, focus groups and qualitative methods, health literacy and information accessibility, mental health via writing, and social media and politics.

Marc A. Smith has published research in multiple venues, most frequently contributing to the Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. Other publication venues include Exploration of Digital Health Technologies, JMIR Infodemiology, and Advances in Radiation Oncology.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Marc A. Smith include:

  • Characterizing Twitter Influencers in Radiation Oncology, 2022, Advances in Radiation Oncology
  • Characterizing the Discourse of Popular Diets to Describe Information Dispersal and Identify Leading Voices, Interaction, and Themes of Mental Health: Social Network Analysis, 2023, JMIR Infodemiology
  • The power of #physiotherapy: a social media hashtag investigation on X (formerly Twitter), 2024, Exploration of Digital Health Technologies
  • Space Planning for Online Community, 2021, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • Some Users Pack a Wallop: Measuring the Impact of Core Users on the Participation of Others in Online Social Systems, 2021, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media

Marc A. Smith collaborates frequently with various researchers such as Himel Mondal, Michel-Edwar Mickael, Maima Matin, Dalibor Hrg, and Farhan Bin Matin.

Best Publications

  • Analyzing Social Media Networks with NodeXL: Insights from a Connected World

    Derek Hansen;Ben Shneiderman;Marc A. Smith

  • Communities in Cyberspace

    Peter Kollock;Marc A. Smith

  • Birds of a Feather Tweet Together: Integrating Network and Content Analyses to Examine Cross-Ideology Exposure on Twitter

    Itai Himelboim;Stephen McCreery;Marc Smith

  • Managing the virtual commons : Cooperation and conflict in computer communities

    P. Kollock;M. Smith

  • Analyzing (social media) networks with NodeXL

    Marc A. Smith;Ben Shneiderman;Natasa Milic-Frayling;Eduarda Mendes Rodrigues

  • Visualizing the Signatures of Social Roles in Online Discussion Groups

    Howard T. Welser;Eric Gleave;Danyel Fisher;Marc A. Smith

  • Visualizations for collaborative information

    Marc A. Smith;Steven M. Drucker;Rebecca Xiong

  • Invisible Crowds in Cyberspace: Mapping the Social Structure of the Usenet

    Marc A. Smith

  • Invisible crowds in cyberspace

    Peter Kollock;Marc Smith

  • Conversation trees and threaded chats

    Marc Smith;J. J. Cadiz;Byron Burkhalter

  • Visualization components for persistent conversations

    Marc A. Smith;Andrew T. Fiore

  • Classifying Twitter Topic-Networks Using Social Network Analysis:

    Itai Himelboim;Marc A. Smith;Lee Rainie;Ben Shneiderman

  • Stitching: pen gestures that span multiple displays

    Ken Hinckley;Gonzalo Ramos;Francois Guimbretiere;Patrick Baudisch

  • You Are Who You Talk To: Detecting Roles in Usenet Newsgroups

    D. Fisher;M. Smith;H.T. Welser

  • Finding social roles in Wikipedia

    Howard T. Welser;Dan Cosley;Gueorgi Kossinets;Austin Lin

  • Picturing Usenet: Mapping Computer-Mediated Collective Action

    Tammara Combs Turner;Marc A. Smith;Danyel Fisher;Howard T. Welser

  • A Conceptual and Operational Definition of 'Social Role' in Online Community

    Eric Gleave;Howard T. Welser;Thomas M. Lento;Marc A. Smith

  • Discussion catalysts in online political discussions: Content importers and conversation starters

    Itai Himelboim;Eric Gleave;Marc A. Smith

  • Revisiting Whittaker & Sidner's "email overload" ten years later

    Danyel Fisher;A. J. Brush;Eric Gleave;Marc A. Smith

  • Newsgroup Crowds and AuthorLines: visualizing the activity of individuals in conversational cyberspaces

    F.B. Viegas;M. Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Ben Shneiderman
Ben Shneiderman University of Maryland, College Park
Derek L. Hansen
Derek L. Hansen Brigham Young University
Danyel Fisher
Danyel Fisher Microsoft (United States)
Itai Himelboim
Itai Himelboim University of Georgia
Steven M. Drucker
Steven M. Drucker Microsoft (United States)
A. J. Bernheim Brush
A. J. Bernheim Brush Microsoft (United States)
Carman Neustaedter
Carman Neustaedter Simon Fraser University
Scott Counts
Scott Counts Microsoft (United States)
John Yen
John Yen Pennsylvania State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA doesn’t mean limiting your choices. You’ll find a broad range of online electrical engineering degree ranking programs, offering technical skills that complement computer science foundations. Many students also take advantage of easy certifications to get online. These certifications can quickly enhance your resume and often bring substantial salary advantages across a variety of tech-related fields.

If time is a concern, you might consider programs from the shortest masters degree programs online. These efficient pathways let you earn a recognized credential without a long commitment, helping you enter or advance in your chosen career sooner. When deciding which direction to pursue, review the most useful graduate degrees in today’s job market. These in-demand programs are highly valued by employers and offer versatile career opportunities, ensuring your investment in education pays long-term dividends.

Best Scientists Citing Marc A. Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles