World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
51
Citations
9975
World Ranking
5363
National Ranking
2456

Danyel Fisher publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Danyel Fisher sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 139 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Danyel Fisher D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Danyel Fisher sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2010 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Danyel Fisher is affiliated with Microsoft in the United States and has contributed to the field of computer science, with a focus on artificial intelligence and communication. Their research spans several subfields including computer science applications, computer vision and pattern recognition, and management information systems.

The scientist's work addresses topics such as advanced text analysis techniques, sentiment analysis and opinion mining, topic modeling, wikis in education and collaboration, open source software innovations, knowledge management and sharing, and data visualization and analytics.

Recent publications by Danyel Fisher include:

  • Space Planning for Online Community, 2021, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • BubbleUp: Supporting DevOps With Data Visualization, 2021, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications

They have contributed to venues including:

  • Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications
  • ANZ Journal of Surgery

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Danyel Fisher are Michael Sedlmair, Michael Gamon, Sumit Basu, Dmitriy Belenko, and Matthew Hurst.

In addition to journal and conference papers, Danyel Fisher has published a book titled Progressive Data Analysis in 2024 through the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.

Professional recognition includes the ACM Senior Member award received in 2010.

Best Publications

  • Visualizing the Signatures of Social Roles in Online Discussion Groups

    Howard T. Welser;Eric Gleave;Danyel Fisher;Marc A. Smith

  • Effectiveness of Animation in Trend Visualization

    G. Robertson;R. Fernandez;D. Fisher;B. Lee

  • Interactions with big data analytics

    Danyel Fisher;Rob DeLine;Mary Czerwinski;Steven Drucker

  • Analysis and Visualization of Network Data using JUNG

    Joshua O’Madadhain;Danyel Fisher;Padhraic Smyth;Yan-Biao Boey

  • Animated exploration of dynamic graphs with radial layout

    Ka-Ping Yee;D. Fisher;R. Dhamija;M. Hearst

  • You Are Who You Talk To: Detecting Roles in Usenet Newsgroups

    D. Fisher;M. Smith;H.T. Welser

  • What Do We Talk About When We Talk About Dashboards

    Alper Sarikaya;Michael Correll;Lyn Bartram;Melanie Tory

  • Incremental visualization for structured data in an enterprise-level data store

    Danyel A. Fisher;Arnd Christian König;Steven M. Drucker

  • Picturing Usenet: Mapping Computer-Mediated Collective Action

    Tammara Combs Turner;Marc A. Smith;Danyel Fisher;Howard T. Welser

  • A Deeper Understanding of Sequence in Narrative Visualization

    Jessica Hullman;Steven Drucker;Nathalie Henry Riche;Bongshin Lee

  • Trust me, i'm partially right: incremental visualization lets analysts explore large datasets faster

    Danyel Fisher;Igor Popov;Steven Drucker;m.c. schraefel

  • Visual snippets: summarizing web pages for search and revisitation

    Jaime Teevan;Edward Cutrell;Danyel Fisher;Steven M. Drucker

  • Trill: a high-performance incremental query processor for diverse analytics

    Badrish Chandramouli;Jonathan Goldstein;Mike Barnett;Robert DeLine

  • Revisiting Whittaker & Sidner's "email overload" ten years later

    Danyel Fisher;A. J. Brush;Eric Gleave;Marc A. Smith

  • Reducing legacy bias in gesture elicitation studies

    Meredith Ringel Morris;Andreea Danielescu;Steven Drucker;Danyel Fisher

  • Hotmap: Looking at Geographic Attention

    D. Fisher

  • Social and temporal structures in everyday collaboration

    Danyel Fisher;Paul Dourish

  • Co-Located Collaborative Visual Analytics around a Tabletop Display

    P. Isenberg;D. Fisher;S. A. Paul;M. R. Morris

  • Collaborative brushing and linking for co-located visual analytics of document collections

    Petra Isenberg;Danyel Fisher

  • Ordering personal information using social metadata

    Danyel A. Fisher;Alice Jane Bernheim Brush;Andrew W. Jacobs;Marc A. Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven M. Drucker
Steven M. Drucker Microsoft (United States)
George G. Robertson
George G. Robertson Microsoft (United States)
Marc A. Smith
Marc A. Smith Connected Action Consulting Group
Robert DeLine
Robert DeLine Microsoft (United States)
Bongshin Lee
Bongshin Lee Microsoft (United States)
Mary Czerwinski
Mary Czerwinski Microsoft (United States)
Jonathan Goldstein
Jonathan Goldstein Microsoft (United States)
Petra Isenberg
Petra Isenberg French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
John Platt
John Platt Google (United States)
Meredith Ringel Morris
Meredith Ringel Morris Google (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education opens a range of flexible options for those interested in Computer Science. For students looking to complete their studies quickly, the fastest masters degree online programs allow you to earn an advanced degree in a shortened timeframe, helping you advance your career sooner.

Choosing a program that aligns with current job market demands is also crucial. Consider enrolling in one of the most worthwhile masters degrees, which are recognized for their value and strong career prospects in technology fields.

Not ready to commit to a bachelor's or master's? Many reputable schools offer online associates degrees in Computer Science, providing foundational skills and a clear entry point for the tech industry or future academic pathways.

Affordability is a key consideration for many students. Fortunately, some of the cheapest online colleges offer accredited Computer Science programs, making it possible to pursue your education without overwhelming financial strain.

Best Scientists Citing Danyel Fisher

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles