World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
91
Citations
30886
World Ranking
11737
National Ranking
6019

Gary R. Bond publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gary R. Bond sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 327 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Gary R. Bond D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gary R. Bond sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gary R. Bond is affiliated with Westat in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the health professions, with a specific emphasis on general health professions, psychiatry and mental health, clinical psychology, social psychology, and speech and hearing.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Schizophrenia Research and Treatment
  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
  • Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes

Gary R. Bond has contributed to several research papers, including:

  • An update on Individual Placement and Support, 2020, World Psychiatry
  • A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of IPS Supported Employment for Young Adults with Mental Health Conditions, 2022, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research

Frequent co-authors in their research include Robert E. Drake, Deborah R. Becker, Monirah Al-Abdulmunem, Torleif Ruud, and Kristin Sverdvik Heiervang.

The most frequent publication venues for Gary R. Bond's work are:

  • Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
  • Psychiatric Services
  • Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal
  • The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
  • Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences

Best Publications

  • Models of community care for severe mental illness : A review of research on case management

    Kim T. Mueser;Gary R. Bond;Robert E. Drake;Sandra G. Resnick

  • An update on randomized controlled trials of evidence-based supported employment.

    Gary R. Bond;Robert E. Drake;Deborah R. Becker

  • Supported employment: evidence for an evidence-based practice

    Gary R. Bond

  • Review of Integrated Mental Health and Substance Abuse Treatment for Patients With Dual Disorders

    Robert E. Drake;Carolyn Mercer-McFadden;Kim T. Mueser;Gregory J. McHugo

  • Implementing supported employment as an evidence-based practice.

    Gary R. Bond;Deborah R. Becker;Robert E. Drake;Charles A. Rapp

  • Helping people with severe mental illness to obtain work: systematic review

    Ruth E Crowther;Max Marshall;Gary R Bond;Peter Huxley

  • Assertive Community Treatment for People with Severe Mental Illness

    Gary R. Bond;Robert E. Drake;Kim T. Mueser;Eric Latimer

  • Program fidelity in assertive community treatment: development and use of a measure.

    Gregory B. Teague;Gary R. Bond;Robert E. Drake

  • An update on supported employment for people with severe mental illness.

    Gary R. Bond;Robert E. Drake;Kim T. Mueser;Deborah R. Becker

  • A randomized clinical trial of supported employment for inner-city patients with severe mental disorders.

    Robert E. Drake;Gregory J. McHugo;Richard R. Bebout;Deborah R. Becker

  • Measuring the fidelity of implementation of a mental health program model

    John H. McGrew;Gary R. Bond;Laura Dietzen;Michelle Salyers

  • Principles and Practice of Psychiatric Rehabilitation : An Empirical Approach

    Patrick W. Corrigan;Kim T. Mueser;Gary R. Bond;Robert E. Drake

  • Generalizability of the Individual Placement and Support (IPS) model of supported employment outside the US.

    Gary R. Bond;Robert E. Drake;Deborah R. Becker

  • Does competitive employment improve nonvocational outcomes for people with severe mental illness

    Gary R. Bond;Sandra G. Resnick;Robert E. Drake;Haiyi Xie

  • Measurement of fidelity in psychiatric rehabilitation.

    Gary R. Bond;Lisa Evans;Michelle P. Salyers;Jane Williams

  • Vocational rehabilitation for people with severe mental illness.

    Ruth Crowther;Max Marshall;Gary R Bond;Peter Huxley

  • Assertive case management in three CMHCs: a controlled study.

    Gary R. Bond;Larry D. Miller;Robert D. Krumwied;Rebecca S. Ward

  • Work and nonvocational domains of functioning in persons with severe mental illness: A longitudinal analysis.

    Kim T. Mueser;Deborah R. Becker;William C. Torrey;Haiyi Xie

  • A fidelity scale for the Individual Placement and Support model of supported employment.

    Gary R. Bond;Deborah R. Becker;Robert E. Drake;Kathleen M. Vogler

  • Principles of the Individual Placement and Support model: Empirical support.

    Gary R. Bond

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert E. Drake
Robert E. Drake Westat (United States)
Gregory J. McHugo
Gregory J. McHugo Dartmouth College
Michelle P. Salyers
Michelle P. Salyers Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis
Kim T. Mueser
Kim T. Mueser Boston University
Charles A. Rapp
Charles A. Rapp University of Kansas
Paul H. Lysaker
Paul H. Lysaker Indiana University
Rob Whitley
Rob Whitley McGill University
Peter Huxley
Peter Huxley Bangor University
Dawn I. Velligan
Dawn I. Velligan The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Jack Tsai
Jack Tsai The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The path to a medical career in the USA extends far beyond a traditional MD. Today, many students explore related degrees and flexible programs online. For those passionate about wellness, an online nutrition degree provides a foundation in health, diet, and disease prevention—skills increasingly sought after in modern healthcare.

Accreditation is a major concern for healthcare professionals. When considering advanced practice and administration, look for which online healthcare degree programs are recognized for their accreditation by cahme? to ensure your education meets industry standards and enhances your job prospects.

Nurses aiming to advance can benefit from flexible bridge programs. The best online rn to bsn programs without clinical requirements allow working RNs to earn a bachelor's degree efficiently, often without disrupting their current job.

For nurses seeking leadership roles, pursuing a doctorate is more accessible than ever. Choose from the shortest dnp programs online, helping you fast-track your qualifications and expand your career opportunities in advanced practice, policy, or education.

Best Scientists Citing Gary R. Bond

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles