World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 59 3676 3390 2064 1861 276 15005

Michelle P. Salyers publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michelle P. Salyers between 1994 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michelle P. Salyers published across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025, averaging 9 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2017. 16 of the 288 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2017. 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 8 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 8 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 18 publications 2015: 26 publications 2016: 25 publications 2017: 28 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 20 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 6 publications
1994 2025

288 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michelle P. Salyers: publications per year, 1994 to 2025
Year Publications
1994 1
1995 0
1996 0
1997 1
1998 2
1999 0
2000 2
2001 7
2002 0
2003 1
2004 8
2005 2
2006 1
2007 8
2008 4
2009 9
2010 8
2011 8
2012 8
2013 18
2014 18
2015 26
2016 25
2017 28
2018 8
2019 17
2020 20
2021 19
2022 12
2023 11
2024 10
2025 6
Total 288
Download as CSV

Michelle P. Salyers publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michelle P. Salyers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 271–280 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 276 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151 276
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Michelle P. Salyers D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michelle P. Salyers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325 59
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Michelle P. Salyers is affiliated with Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis in the United States. The research primarily addresses topics within psychology, health professions, and medicine, with a significant focus on mental health and related fields.

The main fields of study encompass:

  • Psychology
  • Health Professions
  • Medicine

In terms of subfields, research contributions span:

  • General Health Professions
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental Health
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

The central topics of work include:

  • Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Schizophrenia Research and Treatment
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Healthcare Professionals' Stress and Burnout
  • Mental Health Research Topics

Recent papers cover a range of issues related to mental health and social functioning, with notable publications:

  • "The insight paradox in schizophrenia: A meta-analysis of the relationship between clinical insight and quality of life" (2020, Schizophrenia Research)
  • "Organizational conditions that influence work engagement and burnout: A qualitative study of mental health workers" (2021, Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal)
  • "Peer recovery services for persons returning from prison: Pilot randomized clinical trial investigation of SUPPORT" (2021, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment)
  • "The link between formal thought disorder and social functioning in schizophrenia: A meta-analysis" (2020, European Psychiatry)
  • "Quality versus quantity: Determining real-world social functioning deficits in schizophrenia" (2021, Psychiatry Research)

Frequent coauthors collaborating on multiple papers include:

  • Angela L. Rollins
  • Jennifer M. Garabrant
  • Kyle S. Minor
  • Johanne Eliacin
  • Matthew C. Aalsma

The scientist's work appears regularly in specific publication venues, with multiple contributions in:

  • Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal
  • Schizophrenia Research
  • Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
  • Journal of Pain
  • Research Square

There are no records of book publications or awards listed for this researcher.

Best Publications

  • Burnout in Mental Health Services: A Review of the Problem and Its Remediation

    Gary Morse;Michelle P. Salyers;Michelle P. Salyers;Angela L. Rollins;Angela L. Rollins;Maria Monroe-DeVita

  • The Relationship Between Professional Burnout and Quality and Safety in Healthcare: A Meta-Analysis.

    Michelle P. Salyers;Kelsey A. Bonfils;Lauren Luther;Ruth L. Firmin

  • Prevalence of HIV, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C in people with severe mental illness.

    Stanley D. Rosenberg;Lisa A. Goodman;Fred C. Osher;Marvin S. Swartz

  • Measuring the fidelity of implementation of a mental health program model

    John H. McGrew;Gary R. Bond;Laura Dietzen;Michelle Salyers

  • Reliability and validity of the SF-12 health survey among people with severe mental illness.

    Michelle P. Salyers;Hayden B. Bosworth;Jeffrey W. Swanson;Jerilynn Lamb-Pagone

  • A Prospective Analysis of Work in Schizophrenia

    Kim T. Mueser;Michelle P. Salyers;Peter R. Mueser

  • Recent victimization in women and men with severe mental illness: prevalence and correlates.

    Lisa A. Goodman;Michelle P. Salyers;Kim T. Mueser;Stanley D. Rosenberg

  • Measurement of fidelity in psychiatric rehabilitation.

    Gary R. Bond;Lisa Evans;Michelle P. Salyers;Jane Williams

  • The Illness Management and Recovery Program: Rationale, Development, and Preliminary Findings

    Kim T. Mueser;Piper S. Meyer;David L. Penn;Richard Clancy;Richard Clancy

  • Psychometric evaluation of trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder assessments in persons with severe mental illness.

    Kim T. Mueser;Michelle P. Salyers;Stanley D. Rosenberg;Julian D. Ford

  • Job burnout in mental health providers: A meta-analysis of 35 years of intervention research.

    Kimberly C. Dreison;Lauren Luther;Kelsey A. Bonfils;Michael T. Sliter

  • Interpersonal Trauma and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Patients With Severe Mental Illness: Demographic, Clinical, and Health Correlates

    Kim T Mueser;Michelle P Salyers;Stanley D Rosenberg;Lisa A Goodman

  • ACT and recovery: integrating evidence-based practice and recovery orientation on assertive community treatment teams.

    Michelle P. Salyers;Michelle P. Salyers;Sam Tsemberis

  • Anxiety symptoms in schizophrenia spectrum disorders: associations with social function, positive and negative symptoms, hope and trauma history.

    P. H. Lysaker;M. P. Salyers

  • How evidence-based practices contribute to community integration.

    Gary R. Bond;Michelle P. Salyers;Angela L. Rollins;Charles A. Rapp

  • Social functioning, psychopathology, and medication side effects in relation to substance use and abuse in schizophrenia.

    Michelle P Salyers;Kim T Mueser

  • A ten-year follow-up of a supported employment program.

    Michelle P. Salyers;Deborah R. Becker;Robert E. Drake;William C. Torrey

  • Proceedings from the 9th annual conference on the science of dissemination and implementation

    David Chambers;Lisa Simpson;Felicia Hill-Briggs;Gila Neta

  • A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Two Vocational Models for Persons with Severe Mental Illness.

    Gary R. Bond;Michelle P. Salyers;Jerry Dincin;Robert E. Drake

  • Burnout and self-reported quality of care in community mental health.

    Michelle P. Salyers;Sadaaki Fukui;Angela L. Rollins;Ruth Firmin

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul H. Lysaker
Paul H. Lysaker Indiana University
Kyle S. Minor
Kyle S. Minor Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis
Kim T. Mueser
Kim T. Mueser Boston University
Gary R. Bond
Gary R. Bond Westat (United States)
Richard M. Frankel
Richard M. Frankel Washington University in St. Louis
Jack Tsai
Jack Tsai The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Elizabeth W. Twamley
Elizabeth W. Twamley University of California, San Diego
Matthew Chinman
Matthew Chinman RAND Corporation
David Roe
David Roe University of Haifa
Lisa A. Goodman
Lisa A. Goodman Boston College

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Psychology degree in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degree programs and career pathways. Many students choose to continue their education beyond a bachelor’s degree, often enrolling in master's or doctoral online programs. These advanced degrees are crucial for those aiming to become licensed therapists or counselors.

If you are considering a career in therapy, it’s important to understand the licensing requirements that vary by location. For instance, Fresno licensed therapist education requirements emphasize the completion of specific graduate coursework and supervised experience. Similarly, Garland licensed therapist education requirements focus on state-approved programs and exams.

Aspiring professionals in other regions should review the becoming a licensed therapist in Gilbert guidelines or the licensed therapist requirements in Glendale to ensure compliance with local standards. Deciding on the right online pathway can help you meet these requirements and advance your psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Michelle P. Salyers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles