World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
33
Citations
3503
World Ranking
10669
National Ranking
5576

Kyle S. Minor publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kyle S. Minor sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 88 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Kyle S. Minor D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kyle S. Minor sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Emotional Experience in Patients With Schizophrenia Revisited: Meta-analysis of Laboratory Studies

    Alex S. Cohen;Kyle S. Minor

  • Metacognitive function and fragmentation in schizophrenia: Relationship to cognition, self-experience and developing treatments.

    Paul H. Lysaker;Kyle S. Minor;John T. Lysaker;Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon

  • The state-trait disjunction of anhedonia in schizophrenia: Potential affective, cognitive and social-based mechanisms

    Alex S. Cohen;Gina M. Najolia;Laura A. Brown;Kyle S. Minor

  • Empathy in schizophrenia: A meta-analysis of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index.

    Kelsey A. Bonfils;Paul H. Lysaker;Paul H. Lysaker;Kyle S. Minor;Michelle P. Salyers

  • Stigma resistance is positively associated with psychiatric and psychosocial outcomes: A meta-analysis

    Ruth L. Firmin;Lauren Luther;Paul H. Lysaker;Kyle S. Minor

  • Affective empathy in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis

    Kelsey A. Bonfils;Paul H. Lysaker;Paul H. Lysaker;Kyle S. Minor;Michelle P. Salyers

  • Metacognitive Deficits in Schizophrenia: Presence and Associations With Psychosocial Outcomes.

    Paul H. Lysaker;Jenifer Vohs;Kyle S. Minor;Leonor Irarrázaval

  • The neurocognitive underpinnings of diminished expressivity in schizotypy: what the voice reveals

    Alex S. Cohen;Bianca Iglesias;Kyle S. Minor

  • Deficits in metacognitive capacity distinguish patients with schizophrenia from those with prolonged medical adversity

    Paul H. Lysaker;Paul H. Lysaker;Jenifer Vohs;Jenifer Vohs;Jay A. Hamm;Marina Kukla

  • Necessary, but not sufficient: links between neurocognition, social cognition, and metacognition in schizophrenia are moderated by disorganized symptoms.

    Kyle S. Minor;Paul H. Lysaker;Paul H. Lysaker

  • Neurocognition in psychometrically defined college Schizotypy samples: we are not measuring the "right stuff".

    Charlotte A. Chun;Kyle S. Minor;Alex S. Cohen

  • Lexical analysis in schizophrenia: how emotion and social word use informs our understanding of clinical presentation.

    Kyle S. Minor;Kelsey A. Bonfils;Lauren Luther;Ruth L. Firmin

  • Towards a Cognitive Resource Limitations Model of Diminished Expression in Schizotypy

    Alex S. Cohen;Sean C. Morrison;Laura A. Brown;Kyle S. Minor

  • Genetics of smoking and depression

    Ming T. Tsuang;Ming T. Tsuang;Tracee Francis;Kyle Minor;Alison Thomas

  • The insight paradox in schizophrenia: A meta-analysis of the relationship between clinical insight and quality of life.

    Beshaun J. Davis;Paul H. Lysaker;Michelle P. Salyers;Kyle S. Minor

  • Stigma resistance at the personal, peer, and public levels: A new conceptual model.

    Ruth L. Firmin;Lauren Luther;Paul H. Lysaker;Kyle S. Minor

  • Measuring disorganized speech in schizophrenia: automated analysis explains variance in cognitive deficits beyond clinician-rated scales.

    K. S. Minor;J. A. Willits;M. P. Marggraf;M. N. Jones

  • Metacognitive capacity as a predictor of insight in first-episode psychosis

    Jenifer L. Vohs;Paul H. Lysaker;Emily Liffick;Michael M. Francis

  • Evidence of disturbances of deep levels of semantic cohesion within personal narratives in schizophrenia

    Jon Anthony Willits;Timothy Rubin;Michael N. Jones;Kyle S. Minor

  • Metacognitive deficits predict future levels of negative symptoms in schizophrenia controlling for neurocognition, affect recognition, and self-expectation of goal attainment

    Paul H. Lysaker;Paul H. Lysaker;Marina Kukla;Marina Kukla;Julien Dubreucq;Andrew Gumley

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul H. Lysaker
Paul H. Lysaker Indiana University
Michelle P. Salyers
Michelle P. Salyers Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis
Alex S. Cohen
Alex S. Cohen Louisiana State University
Kelly D. Buck
Kelly D. Buck Veterans Health Administration
Giancarlo Dimaggio
Giancarlo Dimaggio Centro di Terapia Metacognitiva Interpersonale - Rome
Larry J. Seidman
Larry J. Seidman Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Alan Breier
Alan Breier Indiana University
John H. McGrew
John H. McGrew Indiana University
Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon
Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon Bar-Ilan University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Kyle S. Minor

Recently Published Articles