World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
43
Citations
5604
World Ranking
7356
National Ranking
3967

Kelly D. Buck publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kelly D. Buck sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 94 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Kelly D. Buck D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kelly D. Buck sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kelly D. Buck is affiliated with the Veterans Health Administration in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Medicine, with a focus on Psychiatry and Mental Health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Applied Psychology.

The scientist's work centers on topics such as schizophrenia research and treatment, mental health research topics, and digital mental health interventions. These areas of focus are reflected in their recent research output and collaborative projects.

Kelly D. Buck has published in the Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, a frequent venue for their work. Their known recent paper is titled Personalizing interventions using real-world interactions: Improving symptoms and social functioning in schizophrenia with tailored metacognitive therapy. It was published in 2021 in the same journal and has received citations highlighting its engagement within the academic community.

The scientist has collaborated with several co-authors throughout their research projects. These include:

  • Kyle S. Minor
  • Matthew P. Marggraf
  • Beshaun J. Davis
  • Jessica L. Mickens
  • Danielle B. Abel

Kelly D. Buck's work contributes to advancing the understanding and treatment of mental health conditions, particularly schizophrenia, using personalized and digital intervention methods. Their interdisciplinary approach integrates psychological theory and clinical practice in efforts to improve patient outcomes within the Veterans Health Administration framework.

Best Publications

  • Metacognition and schizophrenia: the capacity for self-reflectivity as a predictor for prospective assessments of work performance over six months.

    Paul H. Lysaker;Giancarlo Dimaggio;Antonino Carcione;Michele Procacci

  • Addressing metacognitive capacity for self reflection in the psychotherapy for schizophrenia: a conceptual model of the key tasks and processes.

    Paul H. Lysaker;Kelly D. Buck;Kelly D. Buck;Antonino Carcione;Michelle Procacci

  • Metacognition within narratives of schizophrenia: associations with multiple domains of neurocognition.

    Paul H. Lysaker;Giancarlo Dimaggio;Kelly D. Buck;Antonino Carcione

  • Metacognition as a mediator of the effects of impairments in neurocognition on social function in schizophrenia spectrum disorders.

    Paul H Lysaker;A M Shea;K D Buck;G Dimaggio

  • Poor insight in schizophrenia: links between different forms of metacognition with awareness of symptoms, treatment need, and consequences of illness.

    Paul H. Lysaker;Paul H. Lysaker;Giancarlo Dimaggio;Kelly D. Buck;Kelly D. Buck;Stephanie S. Callaway;Stephanie S. Callaway

  • Metacognition, social cognition, and symptoms in patients with first episode and prolonged psychoses.

    J.L. Vohs;J.L. Vohs;P.H. Lysaker;M.M. Francis;M.M. Francis;J. Hamm

  • Social cognition and metacognition in schizophrenia: evidence of their independence and linkage with outcomes.

    P. H. Lysaker;P. H. Lysaker;A. Gumley;B. Luedtke;B. Luedtke;K. D. Buck

  • Metacognition and social cognition in schizophrenia: Stability and relationship to concurrent and prospective symptom assessments

    Jay A. Hamm;Selwyn B. Renard;Rebecca L. Fogley;Bethany L. Leonhardt

  • The recovery of metacognitive capacity in schizophrenia across 32 months of individual psychotherapy: A case study

    Paul H. Lysaker;Kelly D. Buck;Jamie Ringer

  • Metacognition in schizophrenia: The relationship of mastery to coping, insight, self-esteem, social anxiety, and various facets of neurocognition

    Paul H. Lysaker;Paul H. Lysaker;Molly Erickson;Jamie Ringer;Kelly D. Buck

  • Changes in narrative structure and content in schizophrenia in long term individual psychotherapy: a single case study

    Paul H. Lysaker;Paul H. Lysaker;Louanne W. Davis;George J. Eckert;Amy M. Strasburger

  • Assessing metacognition in schizophrenia with the Metacognition Assessment Scale: Associations with the Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale

    Paul H. Lysaker;Paul H. Lysaker;Giancarlo. Dimaggio;Phoebe. Daroyanni;Kelly D. Buck

  • Metacognition and social function in schizophrenia: associations of mastery with functional skills competence.

    Paul H. Lysaker;Paul H. Lysaker;Bryan P. McCormick;Gretchen Snethen;Kelly D. Buck

  • Associations of metacognition with symptoms, insight, and neurocognition in clinically stable outpatients with schizophrenia.

    Giuseppe Nicolò;Giancarlo Dimaggio;Raffaele Popolo;Antonino Carcione

  • Is Recovery from Schizophrenia Possible? An Overview of Concepts, Evidence, and Clinical Implications

    Paul H. Lysaker;Kelly D. Buck

  • Challenges to assisting with the recovery of personal identity and wellness for persons with serious mental illness: Considerations for mental health professionals

    Kelly D. Buck;David Roe;Philip Yanos;Benjamin Buck

  • Metacognitive Reflective and Insight Therapy for People in Early Phase of a Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder

    Jaclyn D. Hillis;Bethany L. Leonhardt;Jenifer L. Vohs;Kelly D. Buck

  • Stereotype endorsement, metacognitive capacity, and self-esteem as predictors of stigma resistance in persons with schizophrenia.

    Lori M. Nabors;Phillip T. Yanos;David Roe;Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon

  • Lack of awareness of illness in schizophrenia: conceptualizations, correlates and treatment approaches

    Paul H Lysaker;Kelly D Buck;Giampaolo Salvatore;Raffaele Popolo

  • Associations of symptoms, psychosocial function and hope with qualities of self-experience in schizophrenia: Comparisons of objective and subjective indicators of health

    Paul H. Lysaker;Paul H. Lysaker;Kelly D. Buck;Kristin Hammoud;Amanda C. Taylor

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul H. Lysaker
Paul H. Lysaker Indiana University
Giancarlo Dimaggio
Giancarlo Dimaggio Centro di Terapia Metacognitiva Interpersonale - Rome
Kyle S. Minor
Kyle S. Minor Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis
Giampaolo Salvatore
Giampaolo Salvatore University of Foggia
Antonino Carcione
Antonino Carcione Laboratori Guglielmo Marconi (Italy)
David Roe
David Roe University of Haifa
Andrew Gumley
Andrew Gumley University of Glasgow
Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon
Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon Bar-Ilan University
Martin Brüne
Martin Brüne Ruhr University Bochum

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens up many diverse online degree and career pathways. One common decision for students is choosing between practicing as a psychologist or a psychiatrist. If you’re curious about pay grades and day-to-day responsibilities, see psychologist salary vs psychiatrist for more insight.

Many students are also interested in organizational settings. The industrial organizational psychologist job outlook remains strong, with experts predicting ongoing demand in corporate consulting, HR, and leadership development. For a complete overview of opportunities in this field, visit io psychology careers to learn more about career options and growth.

For those wondering what academic path to take, earning an advanced degree is often key. Many wonder what can you do with a master’s in behavioral psychology; possibilities range from therapy roles to research, community outreach, and more. Online programs make upgrading your credentials more accessible than ever, helping you tailor your studies to your interests and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Kelly D. Buck

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles