World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 43 4938 4556 1863 1657 92 7319

Philip A. Candela publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Philip A. Candela between 1975 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Philip A. Candela published across 48 years, from 1975 to 2022, averaging 2.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 2006. 3 of the 101 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1975 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 2006. 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 1 publication 2021: 2 publications 2022: 1 publication
1975 2022

101 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Philip A. Candela: publications per year, 1975 to 2022
Year Publications
1975 1
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 1
1985 0
1986 4
1987 3
1988 0
1989 5
1990 2
1991 1
1992 2
1993 1
1994 2
1995 2
1996 2
1997 3
1998 2
1999 2
2000 2
2001 5
2002 3
2003 3
2004 6
2005 4
2006 7
2007 4
2008 3
2009 2
2010 2
2011 3
2012 3
2013 2
2014 2
2015 4
2016 2
2017 3
2018 3
2019 1
2020 1
2021 2
2022 1
Total 101
Download as CSV

Philip A. Candela publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip A. Candela sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 88–97 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 92 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376 92
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Philip A. Candela D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip A. Candela sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279 43
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Philip A. Candela is affiliated with the University of Maryland, College Park in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields with a focus on Earth and Planetary Sciences and Computer Science, integrating work across geophysics and artificial intelligence.

The primary areas of study in Candela's work include:

  • Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
  • High-pressure Geophysics and Materials
  • Earthquake and Tectonic Studies

Candela's research has been published in several notable venues, including:

  • Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology
  • Lithos
  • Goldschmidt2021 abstracts

Their recent papers cover experimental and analytical studies related to mineral compositions and melt formation processes. These include:

  • "Characterization of biotite and amphibole compositions in granites," 2022, Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology
  • "Experimental constraints on the formation of pegmatite-forming melts by anatexis of amphibolite: A case study from Evje-Iveland, Norway," 2021, Lithos
  • "Experimental Constraints on the Formation of Pegmatite-forming Melts by Anatexis of Amphibolite: A Case Study from Evje-Iveland, Norway," 2021, Goldschmidt2021 abstracts

Candela frequently collaborates with researchers such as Austin M. Gion, Philip M. Piccoli, Yingwei Fei, and R. D. Ash, reflecting interdisciplinary engagement within their fields of expertise.

Through their work, Candela contributes to the understanding of high-pressure mineral systems and the processes involved in melt formation and geochemical mapping, integrating computational approaches alongside geophysical techniques.

Best Publications

  • Apatite in Igneous Systems

    Philip M. Piccoli;Philip A. Candela

  • The partitioning of copper and molybdenum between silicate melts and aqueous fluids

    Philip A Candela;Heinrich D Holland

  • A Review of Shallow, Ore-related Granites: Textures, Volatiles, and Ore Metals

    Philip A. Candela

  • A mass transfer model for copper and molybdenum in magmatic hydrothermal systems; the origin of porphyry-type ore deposits

    Philip A. Candela;Heinrich D. Holland

  • Apatite in felsic rocks; a model for the estimation of initial halogen concentrations in the Bishop Tuff (Long Valley) and Tuolumne Intrusive Suite (Sierra Nevada Batholith) magmas

    Philip Piccoli;Philip Candela

  • Controls on ore metal ratios in granite-related ore systems: an experimental and computational approach

    Philip A. Candela

  • Magnetite solubility and iron transport in magmatic-hydrothermal environments

    Adam C. Simon;Thomas Pettke;Philip A. Candela;Philip M. Piccoli

  • Copper partitioning in a melt-vapor-brine-magnetite-pyrrhotite assemblage

    Adam C. Simon;Thomas Pettke;Philip A. Candela;Philip M. Piccoli

  • The influence of oxygen fugacity on tungsten and molybdenum partitioning between silicate melts and ilmenite

    Philip A. Candela;Stephen L. Bouton

  • The partitioning of sulfur and chlorine between andesite melts and magmatic volatiles and the exchange coefficients of major cations

    Zoltán Zajacz;Philip A. Candela;Philip M. Piccoli;Carmen Sanchez-Valle

  • Magmatic Processes in the Development of Porphyry-Type Ore Systems

    Philip A. Candela;Philip M. Piccoli

  • The solubility of copper in high-temperature magmatic vapors: A quest for the significance of various chloride and sulfide complexes

    Zoltán Zajacz;Zoltán Zajacz;Jung Hun Seo;Philip A. Candela;Philip M. Piccoli

  • Magmatic sulfides and Au:Cu ratios in porphyry deposits: an experimental study of copper and gold partitioning at 850°C, 100 MPa in a haplogranitic melt pyrrhotite intermediate solid solution gold metal assemblage, at gas saturation

    P.J. Jugo;P.A. Candela;P.M. Piccoli

  • Alkali metals control the release of gold from volatile-rich magmas

    Zoltán Zajacz;Jung Hun Seo;Philip A. Candela;Philip M. Piccoli

  • The partitioning of copper between silicate melts and two-phase aqueous fluids: An experimental investigation at 1 kbar, 800¡ C and 0.5 kbar, 850¡ C

    Thomas J. Williams;Philip A. Candela;Philip M. Piccoli

  • Toward a thermodynamic model for the halogens in magmatic systems: An application to melt-vapor-apatite equilibria

    Philip A. Candela

  • Solubility and partitioning behavior of Au, Cu, Ag and reduced S in magmas

    Zoltán Zajacz;Philip A. Candela;Philip M. Piccoli;Carmen Sanchez-Valle

  • Physics of aqueous phase evolution in plutonic environments

    Philip A. Candela

  • Gold partitioning in melt-vapor-brine systems

    Adam C. Simon;Mark R. Frank;Thomas Pettke;Philip A. Candela

  • Gold and copper in volatile saturated mafic to intermediate magmas: Solubilities, partitioning, and implications for ore deposit formation

    Zoltán Zajacz;Philip A. Candela;Philip M. Piccoli;Markus Wälle

  • The evolution of aqueous vapor from silicate melts: Effect on oxygen fugacity

    Philip A Candela

Frequent Co-Authors

Philip M. Piccoli
Philip M. Piccoli University of Maryland, College Park
Adam C. Simon
Adam C. Simon University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Thomas Pettke
Thomas Pettke University of Bern
Zoltán Zajacz
Zoltán Zajacz University of Geneva
Robert J. Bodnar
Robert J. Bodnar Virginia Tech
Roberta L. Rudnick
Roberta L. Rudnick University of California, Santa Barbara
Richard J. Walker
Richard J. Walker University of Maryland, College Park
Heinrich D. Holland
Heinrich D. Holland University of Pennsylvania
Markus Wälle
Markus Wälle ETH Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA opens doors to diverse career opportunities, but exploring related fields can enhance your skill set and career prospects. For those interested in broadening their expertise, pursuing an mfa online can develop creative and analytical thinking, valuable in environmental communication and policy roles.

Additionally, leadership and management skills are crucial in many Earth Science careers. Consider a masters degree in human resource management online to gain knowledge in team management and organizational behavior, which are essential for managing scientific projects or teams.

For mature learners or those changing careers, options highlighted under best degrees for older adults offer accessible pathways to re-skill or advance in areas related to Earth Science, like geospatial technology or environmental health.

Finally, if your interest lies in data management or research libraries, exploring ala mlis programs online can prepare you for careers in information science, helping manage scientific data critical to Earth Science research.

Best Scientists Citing Philip A. Candela

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles