World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
43
Citations
7319
World Ranking
4938
National Ranking
1863

Philip A. Candela publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip A. Candela sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 92 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Philip A. Candela D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip A. Candela sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Philip A. Candela is affiliated with the University of Maryland, College Park in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields with a focus on Earth and Planetary Sciences and Computer Science, integrating work across geophysics and artificial intelligence.

The primary areas of study in Candela's work include:

  • Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
  • High-pressure Geophysics and Materials
  • Earthquake and Tectonic Studies

Candela's research has been published in several notable venues, including:

  • Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology
  • Lithos
  • Goldschmidt2021 abstracts

Their recent papers cover experimental and analytical studies related to mineral compositions and melt formation processes. These include:

  • "Characterization of biotite and amphibole compositions in granites," 2022, Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology
  • "Experimental constraints on the formation of pegmatite-forming melts by anatexis of amphibolite: A case study from Evje-Iveland, Norway," 2021, Lithos
  • "Experimental Constraints on the Formation of Pegmatite-forming Melts by Anatexis of Amphibolite: A Case Study from Evje-Iveland, Norway," 2021, Goldschmidt2021 abstracts

Candela frequently collaborates with researchers such as Austin M. Gion, Philip M. Piccoli, Yingwei Fei, and R. D. Ash, reflecting interdisciplinary engagement within their fields of expertise.

Through their work, Candela contributes to the understanding of high-pressure mineral systems and the processes involved in melt formation and geochemical mapping, integrating computational approaches alongside geophysical techniques.

Best Publications

  • Apatite in Igneous Systems

    Philip M. Piccoli;Philip A. Candela

  • The partitioning of copper and molybdenum between silicate melts and aqueous fluids

    Philip A Candela;Heinrich D Holland

  • A Review of Shallow, Ore-related Granites: Textures, Volatiles, and Ore Metals

    Philip A. Candela

  • A mass transfer model for copper and molybdenum in magmatic hydrothermal systems; the origin of porphyry-type ore deposits

    Philip A. Candela;Heinrich D. Holland

  • Apatite in felsic rocks; a model for the estimation of initial halogen concentrations in the Bishop Tuff (Long Valley) and Tuolumne Intrusive Suite (Sierra Nevada Batholith) magmas

    Philip Piccoli;Philip Candela

  • Controls on ore metal ratios in granite-related ore systems: an experimental and computational approach

    Philip A. Candela

  • Magnetite solubility and iron transport in magmatic-hydrothermal environments

    Adam C. Simon;Thomas Pettke;Philip A. Candela;Philip M. Piccoli

  • Copper partitioning in a melt-vapor-brine-magnetite-pyrrhotite assemblage

    Adam C. Simon;Thomas Pettke;Philip A. Candela;Philip M. Piccoli

  • The influence of oxygen fugacity on tungsten and molybdenum partitioning between silicate melts and ilmenite

    Philip A. Candela;Stephen L. Bouton

  • The partitioning of sulfur and chlorine between andesite melts and magmatic volatiles and the exchange coefficients of major cations

    Zoltán Zajacz;Philip A. Candela;Philip M. Piccoli;Carmen Sanchez-Valle

  • Magmatic Processes in the Development of Porphyry-Type Ore Systems

    Philip A. Candela;Philip M. Piccoli

  • The solubility of copper in high-temperature magmatic vapors: A quest for the significance of various chloride and sulfide complexes

    Zoltán Zajacz;Zoltán Zajacz;Jung Hun Seo;Philip A. Candela;Philip M. Piccoli

  • Magmatic sulfides and Au:Cu ratios in porphyry deposits: an experimental study of copper and gold partitioning at 850°C, 100 MPa in a haplogranitic melt pyrrhotite intermediate solid solution gold metal assemblage, at gas saturation

    P.J. Jugo;P.A. Candela;P.M. Piccoli

  • Alkali metals control the release of gold from volatile-rich magmas

    Zoltán Zajacz;Jung Hun Seo;Philip A. Candela;Philip M. Piccoli

  • The partitioning of copper between silicate melts and two-phase aqueous fluids: An experimental investigation at 1 kbar, 800¡ C and 0.5 kbar, 850¡ C

    Thomas J. Williams;Philip A. Candela;Philip M. Piccoli

  • Toward a thermodynamic model for the halogens in magmatic systems: An application to melt-vapor-apatite equilibria

    Philip A. Candela

  • Solubility and partitioning behavior of Au, Cu, Ag and reduced S in magmas

    Zoltán Zajacz;Philip A. Candela;Philip M. Piccoli;Carmen Sanchez-Valle

  • Physics of aqueous phase evolution in plutonic environments

    Philip A. Candela

  • Gold partitioning in melt-vapor-brine systems

    Adam C. Simon;Mark R. Frank;Thomas Pettke;Philip A. Candela

  • Gold and copper in volatile saturated mafic to intermediate magmas: Solubilities, partitioning, and implications for ore deposit formation

    Zoltán Zajacz;Philip A. Candela;Philip M. Piccoli;Markus Wälle

  • The evolution of aqueous vapor from silicate melts: Effect on oxygen fugacity

    Philip A Candela

Frequent Co-Authors

Philip M. Piccoli
Philip M. Piccoli University of Maryland, College Park
Adam C. Simon
Adam C. Simon University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Thomas Pettke
Thomas Pettke University of Bern
Zoltán Zajacz
Zoltán Zajacz University of Geneva
Robert J. Bodnar
Robert J. Bodnar Virginia Tech
Roberta L. Rudnick
Roberta L. Rudnick University of California, Santa Barbara
Richard J. Walker
Richard J. Walker University of Maryland, College Park
Heinrich D. Holland
Heinrich D. Holland University of Pennsylvania
Markus Wälle
Markus Wälle ETH Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA opens doors to diverse career opportunities, but exploring related fields can enhance your skill set and career prospects. For those interested in broadening their expertise, pursuing an mfa online can develop creative and analytical thinking, valuable in environmental communication and policy roles.

Additionally, leadership and management skills are crucial in many Earth Science careers. Consider a masters degree in human resource management online to gain knowledge in team management and organizational behavior, which are essential for managing scientific projects or teams.

For mature learners or those changing careers, options highlighted under best degrees for older adults offer accessible pathways to re-skill or advance in areas related to Earth Science, like geospatial technology or environmental health.

Finally, if your interest lies in data management or research libraries, exploring ala mlis programs online can prepare you for careers in information science, helping manage scientific data critical to Earth Science research.

Best Scientists Citing Philip A. Candela

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles