World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
36
Citations
6573
World Ranking
9446
National Ranking
205

Marcello Gallucci publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcello Gallucci sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 105 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Marcello Gallucci D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcello Gallucci sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marcello Gallucci is affiliated with the University of Milano-Bicocca in Italy. Their research spans multiple disciplines with a prominent focus on psychology and medicine.

The primary fields of study for Gallucci include:

  • Psychology
  • Medicine

The researcher's work further breaks down into several subfields such as:

  • Social Psychology
  • Neurology
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Gallucci's research covers a range of topics, with notable emphasis on:

  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

Key recent publications authored or co-authored by Gallucci include:

  • Preliminary predictive criteria for COVID-19 cytokine storm, 2020, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
  • Together Apart: The Mitigating Role of Digital Communication Technologies on Negative Affect During the COVID-19 Outbreak in Italy, 2020, Frontiers in Psychology
  • Social mindfulness and prosociality vary across the globe, 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • How Executive Functioning and Financial Self-efficacy Predict Subjective Financial Well-Being via Positive Financial Behaviors, 2022, Journal of Family and Economic Issues
  • The effect of financial education on pupils' financial knowledge and skills: Evidence from a Solomon four-group design, 2020, The Journal of Educational Research

Frequent collaborators in Gallucci's work include:

  • Edoardo Nicolò Aiello
  • Niels J. Van Doesum
  • Ryan O. Murphy
  • Efrat Aharonov-Majar
  • Ursula Athenstaedt

Gallucci has published multiple articles in several academic venues. The most frequent publication outlets are:

  • Neurological Sciences
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
  • Frontiers in Immunology

Best Publications

  • The personal norm of reciprocity

    Marco Perugini;Marcello Gallucci;Fabio Presaghi;Anna Paola Ercolani

  • A Conceptual and Empirical Examination of Justifications for Dichotomization

    Jamie DeCoster;Anne-Marie R. Iselin;Marcello Gallucci

  • A practical primer to power analysis for simple experimental designs

    Marco Perugini;Marcello Gallucci;Giulio Costantini

  • Intraoperative subcortical language tract mapping guides surgical removal of gliomas involving speech areas.

    Lorenzo Bello;Marcello Gallucci;Marica Fava;Giorgio Carrabba

  • Best Practices for Using Median Splits, Artificial Categorization, and their Continuous Alternatives

    Jamie DeCoster;Marcello Gallucci;Anne-Marie R. Iselin

  • When people fall from grace: Reconsidering the role of envy in Schadenfreude

    Wilco W. van Dijk;Jaap W. Ouwerkerk;Sjoerd Goslinga;Myrke Nieweg

  • Cold-blooded loneliness: Social exclusion leads to lower skin temperatures

    Hans IJzerman;Hans IJzerman;Marcello Gallucci;Wim T.J.L. Pouw;Sophia C. Weiβgerber

  • Safeguard Power as a Protection Against Imprecise Power Estimates.

    Marco Perugini;Marcello Gallucci;Giulio Costantini

  • Avoiding the Social Death Penalty: Ostracism and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas.

    J.W. Ouwerkerk;N.L. Kerr;M. Gallucci;P.A.M. van Lange

  • Racism and the empathy for pain on our skin.

    Matteo Forgiarini;Marcello Gallucci;Angelo Maravita

  • Reading the reading brain: A new meta-analysis of functional imaging data on reading

    Isabella Cattinelli;N. Alberto Borghese;Marcello Gallucci;Eraldo Paulesu

  • Adolescent nonsuicidal self-injury: the effects of personality traits, family relationships and maltreatment on the presence and severity of behaviours.

    Rossella Di Pierro;Irene Sarno;Sara Perego;Marcello Gallucci

  • Together Apart: The Mitigating Role of Digital Communication Technologies on Negative Affect During the COVID-19 Outbreak in Italy

    Alessandro Gabbiadini;Cristina Baldissarri;Federica Durante;Roberta Rosa Valtorta

  • A bumpy train ride: a field experiment on insult, honor, and emotional reactions.

    Hans IJzerman;Wilco W. van Dijk;Marcello Gallucci

  • “How many bad apples does it take to spoil the whole barrel?”: Social exclusion and toleration for bad apples

    Norbert L. Kerr;Norbert L. Kerr;Ann C. Rumble;Ernest S. Park;Jaap W. Ouwerkerk

  • Rehabilitating patients with left spatial neglect by prism exposure during a visuomotor activity.

    Paola Fortis;Angelo Maravita;Marcello Gallucci;Roberta Ronchi

  • Measuring clinical outcomes in neuro-oncology. A battery to evaluate low-grade gliomas (LGG).

    Costanza Papagno;Alessandra Casarotti;Alessandro Comi;Marcello Gallucci

  • Individual differences and social norms: the distinction between reciprocators and prosocials

    Marco Perugini;Marcello Gallucci

  • Pulling yourself together: Meditation promotes congruence between implicit and explicit self-esteem

    Sander L. Koole;Olesya Govorun;Clara Michelle Cheng;Marcello Gallucci

  • An experimental test of a game-theoretical model of reciprocity.

    Marcello Gallucci;Marco Perugini

Frequent Co-Authors

Marco Perugini
Marco Perugini University of Milano-Bicocca
Giuseppe Vallar
Giuseppe Vallar University of Milano-Bicocca
Eraldo Paulesu
Eraldo Paulesu University of Milano-Bicocca
Costanza Papagno
Costanza Papagno University of Trento
Paul A. M. Van Lange
Paul A. M. Van Lange Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Claudio Luzzatti
Claudio Luzzatti University of Milano-Bicocca
Angelo Maravita
Angelo Maravita University of Milano-Bicocca
Zaira Cattaneo
Zaira Cattaneo University of Milano-Bicocca
Siegwart Lindenberg
Siegwart Lindenberg University of Groningen
Irene J Higginson
Irene J Higginson King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the field of psychology continues to evolve, a growing number of students are choosing online degrees for their flexibility and accessibility. These programs often allow learners to explore specialized areas like counseling, clinical psychology, or school psychology, all while balancing work and family commitments.

For those eager to enter the workforce quickly, Mississippi accelerated counseling programs and similar options can help students complete their education in less time. Many states offer distinct pathways; for example, individuals looking for the fastest way to become a counselor in Missouri can choose from state-approved online and hybrid programs.

In other regions, such as Montana and Nebraska, online students can benefit from Montana accelerated counseling programs and Nebraska accelerated counseling programs. These programs often feature streamlined curricula and practical experiences designed to prepare graduates for state licensure and a range of counseling careers.

Whether you’re interested in clinical practice, research, or education, exploring these online degrees can open doors to rewarding and impactful career pathways in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Marcello Gallucci

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles