World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
46
Citations
9913
World Ranking
6375
National Ranking
120

Neuroscience

D-Index
46
Citations
10281
World Ranking
6620
National Ranking
342

Nadia Bolognini publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nadia Bolognini sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 234 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Nadia Bolognini D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nadia Bolognini sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nadia Bolognini is affiliated with the University of Milano-Bicocca in Italy. Their research spans multiple areas within neuroscience and medicine, with a significant focus on topics related to cognitive functioning and neurological disorders.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Neuroscience
  • Medicine

Bolognini has contributed extensively to subfields such as:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neurology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Social Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

The primary topics covered in their work include:

  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Motor Control and Adaptation

Recent publications by Nadia Bolognini highlight a range of research interests and venues. Selected papers include:

  • "The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): updated norms and psychometric insights into adaptive testing from healthy individuals in Northern Italy," 2021, Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
  • "How the effects of actions become our own," 2020, Science Advances
  • "The Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) and its sub-scales: validation and updated normative data in an Italian population sample," 2021, Neurological Sciences
  • "No efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation on chronic migraine with medication overuse: A double blind, randomised clinical trial," 2020, Cephalalgia
  • "Monitoring cognitive and psychological alterations in COVID-19 patients: A longitudinal neuropsychological study," 2022, Journal of the Neurological Sciences

Throughout their career, Bolognini has frequently collaborated with several coauthors, including:

  • Edoardo Nicolò Aiello
  • Giacomo Guidali
  • Lorenzo Diana
  • Ildebrando Appollonio
  • Stefano Zago

Common publication venues for Bolognini's work include:

  • Neurological Sciences
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Scientific Reports

Best Publications

  • Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): Challenges and future directions

    Andre Russowsky Brunoni;Michael A. Nitsche;Nadia Bolognini;Marom Bikson

  • Enhancement of visual perception by crossmodal visuo-auditory interaction

    Francesca Frassinetti;Nadia Bolognini;Elisabetta Làdavas

  • Using Non-invasive Brain Stimulation to Augment Motor Training-induced Plasticity

    Nadia Bolognini;Alvaro Pascual-Leone;Alvaro Pascual-Leone;Felipe Fregni

  • Neurophysiological and Behavioral Effects of tDCS Combined With Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy in Poststroke Patients

    Nadia Bolognini;Nadia Bolognini;Giuseppe Vallar;Carlotta Casati;Lydia Abdul Latif;Lydia Abdul Latif

  • Regulatory considerations for the clinical and research use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): Review and recommendations from an expert panel

    F. Fregni;M. A. Nitsche;C. K. Loo;A. R. Brunoni

  • Somatic and Motor Components of Action Simulation

    Alessio Avenanti;Nadia Bolognini;Angelo Maravita;Salvatore Maria Aglioti

  • TDCS increases cortical excitability: direct evidence from TMS-EEG.

    Leonor J. Romero Lauro;Mario Rosanova;Giulia Mattavelli;Silvia Convento

  • "Acoustical vision" of below threshold stimuli: interaction among spatially converging audiovisual inputs.

    Nadia Bolognini;Francesca Frassinetti;Andrea Serino;Elisabetta Làdavas

  • The sensory side of post-stroke motor rehabilitation

    Nadia Bolognini;Cristina Russo;Dylan J. Edwards

  • Visual search improvement in hemianopic patients after audio-visual stimulation

    N. Bolognini;F. Rasi;M. Coccia;E. Ladavas

  • Proprioceptive alignment of visual and somatosensory maps in the posterior parietal cortex.

    Nadia Bolognini;Angelo Maravita

  • Audiovisual Integration in Patients with Visual Deficit

    Francesca Frassinetti;Nadia Bolognini;Davide Bottari;Annalisa Bonora

  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation: disrupting neural activity to alter and assess brain function.

    Nadia Bolognini;Tony Ro

  • Motor and parietal cortex stimulation for phantom limb pain and sensations

    Nadia Bolognini;Elena Olgiati;Angelo Maravita;Francesco Ferraro

  • Brain polarization of parietal cortex augments training-induced improvement of visual exploratory and attentional skills

    Nadia Bolognini;Felipe Fregni;Carlotta Casati;Elena Olgiati

  • Extension of perceived arm length following tool-use: Clues to plasticity of body metrics

    Ambra Sposito;Nadia Bolognini;Giuseppe Vallar;Angelo Maravita

  • Literal, fictive and metaphorical motion sentences preserve the motion component of the verb: a TMS study.

    C. Cacciari;N. Bolognini;Irene Senna;M.C. Pellicciari

  • Behavioural facilitation following brain stimulation: Implications for neurorehabilitation

    Giuseppe Vallar;Nadia Bolognini

  • Seeing touch in the somatosensory cortex: a TMS study of the visual perception of touch.

    Nadia Bolognini;Angela Rossetti;Angelo Maravita;Carlo Miniussi

  • Neuromodulation of Multisensory Perception: a tDCS study of the sound-induced flash illusion

    Nadia Bolognini;Angela Rossetti;Carlotta Casati;Flavia Mancini

Frequent Co-Authors

Giuseppe Vallar
Giuseppe Vallar University of Milano-Bicocca
Angelo Maravita
Angelo Maravita University of Milano-Bicocca
Chiara Turati
Chiara Turati University of Milano-Bicocca
Carlo Miniussi
Carlo Miniussi University of Trento
Felipe Fregni
Felipe Fregni Harvard University
Mario Rosanova
Mario Rosanova University of Milan
Filippo Brighina
Filippo Brighina University of Palermo
Elisabetta Làdavas
Elisabetta Làdavas University of Bologna
Viola Macchi Cassia
Viola Macchi Cassia University of Milano-Bicocca
Brigida Fierro
Brigida Fierro University of Palermo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience often leads students to consider related fields and flexible educational options. Many learners are interested in msw accelerated programs as a way to enter social work quickly and efficiently, blending neuroscience with practical human services.

For those focused on understanding human behavior, an accelerated bachelor's degree in psychology can provide foundational knowledge relevant to neuroscience careers, with the added benefit of completing your degree faster.

Counseling is another popular direction. Many prospective students look for the cheapest online counseling degree programs or search for affordable online masters counseling programs to minimize debt and maximize career flexibility in mental health services.

These online pathways offer flexibility, affordability, and a strong foundation for a wide range of neuroscience-adjacent careers, from clinical roles to research and public service.

Best Scientists Citing Nadia Bolognini

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles