World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Elisabetta Làdavas

Elisabetta Làdavas

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 73 1997 1809 22 21 187 15746
Neuroscience 73 2241 2048 84 80 190 15755

Elisabetta Làdavas publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Elisabetta Làdavas between 1979 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Elisabetta Làdavas published across 48 years, from 1979 to 2026, averaging 4 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2007. 1 of the 193 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1979 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2007. 1979: 1 publication 1980: 2 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 1 publication 1984: 2 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 3 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 3 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 17 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 5 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 0 publications 2026: 1 publication
1979 2026

193 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Elisabetta Làdavas: publications per year, 1979 to 2026
Year Publications
1979 1
1980 2
1981 0
1982 1
1983 1
1984 2
1985 1
1986 0
1987 3
1988 1
1989 1
1990 3
1991 0
1992 0
1993 3
1994 4
1995 1
1996 3
1997 5
1998 5
1999 0
2000 6
2001 3
2002 9
2003 3
2004 8
2005 13
2006 11
2007 17
2008 10
2009 7
2010 9
2011 6
2012 7
2013 7
2014 5
2015 9
2016 7
2017 5
2018 3
2019 1
2020 5
2021 4
2022 0
2023 0
2024 0
2025 0
2026 1
Total 193
Download as CSV

Elisabetta Làdavas publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elisabetta Làdavas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 187 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397 187
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Elisabetta Làdavas D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elisabetta Làdavas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 72–73 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183 73
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Elisabetta Làdavas is affiliated with the University of Bologna in Italy. Their research primarily focuses on the field of neuroscience, with significant contributions in cognitive neuroscience and experimental and cognitive psychology. The scientist's work explores a range of topics including spatial neglect and hemispheric dysfunction, multisensory perception and integration, and virtual reality applications and impacts.

The scientist's recent publications demonstrate a consistent engagement with key aspects of neuroscience and cognitive function. Notable papers include:

  • "Right Hemisphere Dominance for Unconscious Emotionally Salient Stimuli," 2021, Brain Sciences
  • "Behavioral and functional changes in neglect after multisensory stimulation," 2020, Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
  • "Fear-related signals are prioritised in visual, somatosensory and spatial systems," 2020, Neuropsychologia
  • "The spatial effect of fearful faces in the autonomic response," 2020, Experimental Brain Research
  • "The spatial logic of fear," 2020, Cognition

Frequent co-authors in their research include Giulia Ellena, Caterina Bertini, Francesca Starita, Patrick Haggard, and Simone Battaglia, reflecting collaborative work in overlapping areas of expertise.

Elisabetta Làdavas's publications are found predominantly in journals such as Neuropsychologia, Experimental Brain Research, Brain Sciences, Cognition, and Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. These venues highlight the scientist's focus on the neural and behavioral aspects of psychology as well as neurorehabilitation.

The research topics covered reveal an emphasis on spatial neglect and hemispheric dysfunction, which appear in eight publications. Additional areas of interest encompass multisensory perception and integration, virtual reality applications and impacts, neural and behavioral psychology studies, olfactory and sensory function studies, visual perception and processing mechanisms, and face recognition and perception.

This distribution of work illustrates an interdisciplinary approach, combining elements from cognitive neuroscience and sensory systems to investigate complex behavioral and neural phenomena. The presence of multisensory integration and virtual reality in the research topics suggests an interest in applied and experimental methods for understanding brain function.

Best Publications

  • Hemispatial neglect Subtypes, neuroanatomy, and disability

    Lj Buxbaum;Mk Ferraro;T Veramonti;A Farne

  • Selective deficit in personal moral judgment following damage to ventromedial prefrontal cortex

    Elisa Ciaramelli;Michela Muccioli;Elisabetta Làdavas;Giuseppe di Pellegrino

  • Enhancement of visual perception by crossmodal visuo-auditory interaction

    Francesca Frassinetti;Nadia Bolognini;Elisabetta Làdavas

  • Long‐lasting amelioration of visuospatial neglect by prism adaptation

    Francesca Frassinetti;Valentina Angeli;Francesca Meneghello;Stefano Avanzi

  • Dynamic size-change of hand peripersonal space following tool use.

    Alessandro Farnè;Elisabetta Làdavas

  • Seeing where your hands are

    Giuseppe di Pellegrino;Elisabetta Làdavas;Alessandro Farné

  • Neuropsychological Evidence of an Integrated Visuotactile Representation of Peripersonal Space in Humans

    Elisabetta Làdavas;Giuseppe Di Pellegrino;Alessandro Farnè;Gabriele Zeloni

  • Shaping multisensory action-space with tools: evidence from patients with cross-modal extinction.

    Alessandro Farnè;Atsushi Iriki;Elisabetta Làdavas

  • Extended Multisensory Space in Blind Cane Users

    Andrea Serino;Michela Bassolino;Alessandro Farnè;Elisabetta Làdavas

  • Peripersonal space in the brain.

    Giuseppe di Pellegrino;Elisabetta Làdavas

  • Functional and dynamic properties of visual peripersonal space.

    Elisabetta Làdavas

  • "Acoustical vision" of below threshold stimuli: interaction among spatially converging audiovisual inputs.

    Nadia Bolognini;Francesca Frassinetti;Andrea Serino;Elisabetta Làdavas

  • Low-frequency rTMS promotes use-dependent motor plasticity in chronic stroke: a randomized trial.

    A. Avenanti;M. Coccia;E. Ladavas;L. Provinciali

  • The deployment of visual attention in the intact field of hemineglect patients.

    Elisabetta Làdavas;Elisabetta Làdavas;Alessandro Petronio;Alessandro Petronio;Carlo Umiltà;Carlo Umiltà

  • A psychophysiological investigation of moral judgment after ventromedial prefrontal damage

    Giovanna Moretto;Elisabetta Làdavas;Flavia Mattioli;Giuseppe di Pellegrino

  • Is the hemispatial deficit produced by right parietal lobe damage associated with retinal or gravitational coordinates

    Elisabetta Ladavas

  • Patterns of spontaneous recovery of neglect and associated disorders in acute right brain-damaged patients.

    A Farnè;L J Buxbaum;M Ferraro;F Frassinetti

  • Ameliorating neglect with prism adaptation: visuo-manual and visuo-verbal measures.

    Alessandro Farnè;Yves Rossetti;Silvia Toniolo;Elisabetta Làdavas

  • Anosognosia for hemiplegia, neglect dyslexia, and drawing neglect: clinical findings and theoretical considerations.

    Anna Berti;Elisabetta Làdavas;Monica Della Corte

  • Left tactile extinction following visual stimulation of a rubber hand.

    Alessandro Farnè;Francesco Pavani;Francesca Meneghello;Elisabetta Làdavas

  • Mechanisms underlying neglect recovery after prism adaptation.

    Andrea Serino;Valentina Angeli;Francesca Frassinetti;Elisabetta Làdavas

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrea Serino
Andrea Serino University Hospital of Lausanne
Giuseppe di Pellegrino
Giuseppe di Pellegrino University of Bologna
Francesco Pavani
Francesco Pavani University of Trento
Francesca Frassinetti
Francesca Frassinetti University of Bologna
Patrick Haggard
Patrick Haggard University College London
Nadia Bolognini
Nadia Bolognini University of Milano-Bicocca
Elisa Ciaramelli
Elisa Ciaramelli University of Bologna
Carlo Umiltà
Carlo Umiltà University of Padua
Alessio Avenanti
Alessio Avenanti University of Bologna

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to many rewarding online degrees and career options. One popular pathway is pursuing a degree in social work. Several states offer high-quality, flexible programs designed to help students balance personal and professional commitments. For example, you can find some of the best value online social work programs in Tennessee and the most valuable online social work programs in Texas, both of which prepare graduates for diverse roles in counseling, advocacy, and community support.

Another in-demand career path is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), which requires specialized training. Those interested in this field will need to review specific state requirements. For instance, you can look up the Vermont bcba requirements or learn more about becoming a bcba in Virginia.

Whether you aim to work in social services, mental health, or specialized behavior analysis, accredited online programs offer flexible learning and a direct path to meaningful, impactful careers.

Best Scientists Citing Elisabetta Làdavas

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles